Cerebral monitoring during carotid endarterectomy by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography

被引:16
|
作者
Yun, Woo-Sung [1 ]
机构
[1] Yeungnam Univ, Coll Med, Med Ctr, Div Transplantat & Vasc Surg,Dept Surg, 170 Hyeonchung Ro, Daegu 42415, South Korea
关键词
Carotid endarterectomy; Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA; ISCHEMIA;
D O I
10.4174/astr.2017.92.2.105
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cerebral monitoring by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) for the detection of cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Methods: From August 2004 to December 2013, 159 CEAs were performed in a tertiary hospital. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Intraoperative TCD was routinely used to detect cerebral ischemia. Of the 159 patients, 102 patients were included in this study, excluding 27 patients who had a poor transtemporal isonation window and 30 patients who used additional cerebral monitoring systems such as electroencephalography or somatosensory evoked potentials. When mean flow velocity in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery decreased by >50% versus baseline during carotid clamping carotid shunting was selectively performed. The carotid shunt rate and incidence of perioperative (<30 days) stroke or death were investigated by reviewing medical records. Results: Carotid shunting was performed in 31 of the 102 patients (30%). Perioperative stroke occurred in 2 patients (2%); a minor ischemic stroke caused by embolism in one and an intracerebral hemorrhage in the other. Perioperative death developed in the latter patient. Conclusion: TCD is a safe cerebral monitoring tool to detect cerebral ischemia during CEA. It can reduce use of carotid shunt.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 109
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cerebral injury predicted by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography but not electroencephalography during carotid endarterectomy
    Costin, M
    Rampersad, A
    Solomon, RA
    Connolly, ES
    Heyer, EJ
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 14 (04) : 287 - 292
  • [2] Transcranial Doppler monitoring during carotid endarterectomy
    Tamaschke, C
    Kehl, K
    Chaoui, Z
    Heyn, G
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 1996, 121 (12): : 1036 - 1040
  • [3] TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER MONITORING DURING CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY
    NAYLOR, AR
    WILDSMITH, JAW
    MCCLURE, J
    JENKINS, AM
    RUCKLEY, CV
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (10) : 1264 - 1268
  • [4] Transcranial Doppler monitoring during carotid endarterectomy
    MacLennan, N
    Lam, AM
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (3A) : A1185 - A1185
  • [5] TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER MONITORING OF CEREBRAL BLOOD-FLOW DURING CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY
    TETICKOVIC, E
    MIKSIC, K
    ZDRAVSTVENI VESTNIK, 1992, 61 (5-6): : 249 - 254
  • [6] Cerebral Microembolization During Carotid Endarterectomy versus Carotid Stenting Using Transcranial Doppler Monitoring
    Gupta, Naren
    Wang, Jeffrey Y.
    Robertson, Gregory C.
    Kasirajan, Karthikeshwar
    CIRCULATION, 2009, 120 (18) : S955 - S955
  • [7] Transcranial Doppler Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy
    Udesh, Reshmi
    Natarajan, Piruthiviraj
    Thiagarajan, Karthy
    Wechsler, Lawrence R.
    Crammond, Donald J.
    Balzer, Jeffrey R.
    Thirumala, Parthasarathy D.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2017, 36 (03) : 621 - 630
  • [8] TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER ASSESSMENT OF CEREBRAL COLLATERAL DURING CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY
    PADAYACHEE, TS
    GOSLING, RG
    LEWIS, RR
    BISHOP, CC
    BROWSE, NL
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 74 (04) : 260 - 262
  • [9] The significance of microemboli detection by means of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography monitoring in carotid endarterectomy
    Gregoretti, S
    Bradley, EL
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 23 (04) : 734 - 735
  • [10] THE SIGNIFICANCE OF MICROEMBOLI DETECTION BY MEANS OF TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER ULTRASONOGRAPHY MONITORING IN CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY
    ACKERSTAFF, RGA
    JANSEN, C
    MOLL, FL
    VERMEULEN, FEE
    HAMERLIJNCK, RPHM
    MAUSER, HW
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1995, 21 (06) : 963 - 969