Diagnosis of EML4-ALK Translocation With FISH, Immunohistochemistry, and Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

被引:21
|
作者
Cruz-Rico, Graciela [1 ]
Aviles-Salas, Alejandro [3 ]
Segura-Gonzalez, Manuel [2 ]
Maria Espinosa-Garcia, Ana [4 ]
Alejandra Ramirez-Tirado, Laura [1 ]
Morales-Oyarvide, Vicente [2 ]
Rojas-Marin, Carlos [3 ]
Cardona, Andres-Felipe [5 ]
Arrieta, Oscar [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Mexico City, Expt Oncol Lab, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Hosp Gen Mexico City, Clin Thorac Oncol, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[3] Hosp Gen Mexico City, Inst Nacl Cancerol INCan, Dept Pathol, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[4] Hosp Gen Mexico City, Gen Med Lab, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[5] Clin Cty, Inst Oncol, Clin & Translat Oncol Grp, Bogota, Colombia
关键词
non-small cell lung carcinoma; anaplastic lymphoma kinase; routine diagnostic tests; immunohistochemistry; real-time polymerase chain reaction; ANAPLASTIC LYMPHOMA; FUSION GENE; ALK REARRANGEMENT; KINASE; ADENOCARCINOMA; CRIZOTINIB; INHIBITOR; FEATURES; IDENTIFICATION; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1097/COC.0000000000000213
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement detection with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in comparison with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Methods: Tumor tissue samples from 230 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were analyzed by FISH to detect ALK rearrangements. Additional IHC tests using 5A4 clone and RT-qPCR (variants 1 to 5) were performed in 63 and 48 patients, respectively. Results: Thirteen percent of FISH tests were not evaluable. From the remaining tests (n = 200), 18 (9.0%) were ALK positive (ALK(+)). ALK(+) patients were significantly younger at the time of diagnosis (below 55 y, 14.3% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.035), were light smokers (tobacco index < 10, 12.6% vs. 4.1%, P = 0.049), and presented adenocarcinoma with a mucinous component (30.8 vs. 8.0%, P = 0.007). When comparing FISH with IHC using a cutoff of 1 + or 2 +, and only 2 + staining intensity, the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were as follows: 83.3%, 100.0%, 93.75%, and 100.0%; and 55.6%, 100.0%, 84.9%, and 100.0%, respectively. For RT-qPCR, these results were 55.6, 100, 90.7, and 100.0%, respectively. Conclusions: Our results suggest that RT-qPCR is an inadequate initial test for detecting ALK-positive lung cancer. IHC is highly useful as an initial screening test for ALK rearrangement detection in NSCLC. These results contribute to the medical literature on the establishment of IHC as a standard diagnostic test for ALK rearrangements in NSCLC.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 638
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DIAGNOSIS OF THE ALK-EML4 TRANSLOCATION WITH FISH, IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY, AND REAL TIME-POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION IN PATIENTS WITH NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER.
    Arrieta, Oscar
    Cruz-Rico, Graciela
    Morales-Oyarvide, Vicente
    Aviles-Salas, Alejandro
    Maria Espinosa-Garcia, Ana
    Maldonado-Laguna, Vilma
    Rojas-Enriquez, Carlos
    Cardona Cardona, Andres Felipe
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9 (09) : S188 - S189
  • [2] The biology and treatment of EML4-ALK non-small cell lung cancer
    Sasaki, Takaaki
    Rodig, Scott J.
    Chirieac, Lucian R.
    Janne, Pasi A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (10) : 1773 - 1780
  • [3] EML4-ALK fusion gene in non-small cell lung cancer
    Lei, Yu
    Lei, Yan
    Shi, Xiang
    Wang, Jingjing
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2022, 24 (02)
  • [4] The Biology and Clinical Features of Non-small Cell Lung Cancers with EML4-ALK Translocation
    Pillai, Rathi N.
    Ramalingam, Suresh S.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2012, 14 (02) : 105 - 110
  • [5] Prognostic versus predictive value of EML4-ALK translocation in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
    Shaw, A. T.
    Yeap, B.
    Costa, D. B.
    Solomon, B. J.
    Kwak, E. L.
    Nguyen, A. T.
    Bergethon, K.
    Engelman, J. A.
    Iafrate, A. J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (15)
  • [6] Comparison of IHC, FISH and RT-PCR for the Detection of EML4-ALK Translocation Variants in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Wallander, M. L.
    Geiersbach, K. B.
    Tripp, S.
    Layfield, L. J.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2011, 91 : 427A - 427A
  • [7] EML4-ALK Fusion Gene in Korean Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Jin, Guang
    Jeon, Hyo-Sung
    Lee, Eung Bae
    Kang, Hyo-Gyoung
    Yoo, Seung Soo
    Lee, Shin Yup
    Lee, Jae Hee
    Cha, Sung Ick
    Park, Tae In
    Kim, Chang Ho
    Jheon, Sang Hoon
    Park, Jae Yong
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 27 (02) : 228 - 230
  • [8] Analysis of EML4-ALK rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer in Argentina
    Verzura, Maria
    Batagelj, Emilio
    Bagnes, Claudia
    Martin, Claudio
    Enrico, Diego
    Richardet, Eduardo
    De la Iglesia, Paola
    ANNALS OF DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2018, 34 : 77 - 81
  • [9] Targeting EML4-ALK driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
    Moran, Teresa
    Quiroga, Vanesa
    Llanos Gil, Maria de Los
    Vila, Laia
    Pardo, Nuria
    Carcereny, Enric
    Capdevila, Laia
    Munoz-Marmol, Ana M.
    Rosell, Rafael
    TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 2 (02) : 128 - 141
  • [10] EGFR and EML4-ALK Updated Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    de Mello, Ramon Andrade
    Liu, Davi J. J.
    Aguiar, Pedro N., Jr.
    Tadokoro, Hakaru
    RECENT PATENTS ON ANTI-CANCER DRUG DISCOVERY, 2016, 11 (04) : 393 - 400