Gene expression profile of the bone microenvironment in human fragility fracture bone

被引:93
|
作者
Hopwood, B. [1 ,5 ]
Tsykin, A. [2 ]
Findlay, D. M. [3 ,5 ]
Fazzalari, N. L. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Inst Med & Vet Sci, Div Tissue Pathol, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Math, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Discipline Orthopaed & Trauma, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Discipline Pathol, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[5] Hanson Inst, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Gene microarray; Gene expression profiling; Fragility fracture; Osteoporosis; Osteoblastic osteoclastic adipocytic genes; HUMAN TRABECULAR BONE; A SCAVENGER RECEPTOR; TISSUE GROWTH-FACTOR; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; INSULIN-RESISTANCE; MESSENGER-RNA; NEGATIVE REGULATOR; ANNEXIN-II; DIFFERENTIATION; PROTEIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.bone.2008.08.120
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Osteoporosis (OP) is a common age-related systemic skeletal disease, with a strong genetic component, characterised by loss of bone mass and strength, which leads to increased bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture. Although some progress has been made in identifying genes that may contribute to OP disease, much of the genetic component of OP has yet to be accounted for. Therefore, to investigate the molecular basis for the changes in bone Causally involved in OP and fragility fracture, we have used a microarray approach. We have analysed altered gene expression in human OP fracture bone by comparing mRNA in bone from individuals with fracture of the neck of the proximal femur (OP) with that from age-matched individuals with osteoarthritis (OA), and control (CTL) individuals with no known bone pathology. The OA sample set was included because all inverse association, with respect to bone density, has been reported between OA and the OP individuals. Compugen H19K oligo human microarray slides were used to compare the gene expression profiles of three sets of female samples comprising, 10 OP-CTL, 10 OP-OA, and 10 OA-CTL sample pairs. Using linear models for microarray analysis (Limma), 150 differentially expressed genes in OP bone with t scores >5 were identified. Differential expression of 32 genes in OP bone was confirmed by real time PCR analysis (p<0.01). Many of the genes identified have known or Suspected roles in bone metabolism and in some cases have been implicated previously in OP pathogenesis. Three major sets of differentially expressed genes in OP bone were identified with known or suspected roles in either osteoblast maturation (PRRX1, ANXA2, ST14, CTSB, SPARC, FST LGALS1, SPP1, ADM, and COL4A1), myelomonocytic differentiation and osteoclastogenesis (TREM2, ANXA2, IL10, CD14, CCR1, ADAM9, CCL2, CTGF, and KLF10), or adipogenesis, lipid and/or glucose metabolism (IL10, MARCO, CD14, AEBP1, FST, CCL2, CTGF, SLC14A1, ANGPTL4, ADM, TAZ, PEA15, and DOK4). Altered expression of these genes and others in these groups is consistent with previously Suggested underlying molecular mechanisms for OP that include altered osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation and function, and ail imbalance between osteoblastogenesis and adipogenesis. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 101
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bone remodeling: A review of the bone microenvironment perspective for fragility fracture (osteoporosis) of the hip
    Fazzalari, Nicola L.
    SEMINARS IN CELL & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2008, 19 (05) : 467 - 472
  • [2] Gene expression profile analysis of the bone microenvironment in patients with spinal metastases
    Liu, Wangmi
    Liang, Yun
    Bian, Chong
    Jiang, Libo
    Zheng, Guoli
    Dong, Jian
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 15 (01) : 61 - 68
  • [3] Diabetes, fracture, and bone fragility
    Schwartz A.V.
    Sellmeyer D.E.
    Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2007, 5 (3) : 105 - 111
  • [4] Susceptibility of aging human bone to mixed-mode fracture increases bone fragility
    George, WT
    Vashishth, D
    BONE, 2006, 38 (01) : 105 - 111
  • [5] BONE DENSITOMETRY AND FRAGILITY FRACTURE RISK
    Sacramento, J.
    Montesino, N.
    Padron, N.
    Montesa, M. J.
    Gonzalez, B.
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 36 : S336 - S336
  • [6] BONE CELL ACTIVITY INFLUENCES BONE FRAGILITY AND FRACTURE RISK
    Caetano-Lopes, J.
    Aleixo, I.
    Rodrigues, A.
    Perpetuo, I. P.
    Fernandes, D.
    Lopes, A.
    Pena, A.
    Faustino, A.
    Vale, M.
    Amaral, P. M.
    Monteiro, J.
    Vaz, M. F.
    Canhao, H.
    Fonseca, J. E.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2010, 69
  • [7] THE IMPORTANCE OF INVESTIGATIONS IN DIAGNOSIS OF FRACTURE SECONDARY OF BONE OSTEOPOROSIS OR BONE FRAGILITY
    Cirstoiu, C.
    Cirstoiu, M.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 23 : S810 - S810
  • [8] Advanced imaging of bone macrostructure and microstructure in bone fragility and fracture repair
    Kalpakcioglu, Bann B.
    Morshed, Saam.
    Engelke, Klaus
    Genant, Harry K.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A : 68 - 78
  • [9] In situ fatty acid profile of femoral cancellous subchondral bone in osteoarthritic and fragility fracture females: Implications for bone remodelling
    Humphries, J. M.
    Kuliwaba, J. S.
    Gibson, R. J.
    Fazzalari, N. L.
    BONE, 2012, 51 (02) : 218 - 223
  • [10] A study of gene expression of bone matrix proteins in human fracture callus during normal fracture healing
    Lawton, DM
    Hoyland, JA
    Marsh, DR
    Freemont, AJ
    Andrew, JG
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1996, 11 (10) : P10 - P10