The PACT advance decision-making template: preparing for Mental Health Act reforms with co-production, focus groups and consultation

被引:19
|
作者
Stephenson, Lucy A. [1 ]
Gergel, Tania [1 ]
Keene, Alex Ruck [1 ]
Rifkin, Larry [2 ]
Owen, Gareth [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, 39 Essex Chambers, London, England
[2] South London & Maudsley NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Advance directive; Severe mental illness; Bipolar; Mental capacity; Mental health law; SELF-BINDING DIRECTIVES; JOINT CRISIS PLANS; COMPULSORY TREATMENT; PSYCHOSIS; CAPACITY; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101563
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Background: Advance decision making (ADM) in mental health is supported by stakeholders but faces significant barriers. These must be overcome, not least to support the UK governments commitment to introduce statutory mental health ADM in England and Wales. Aims: To build understanding and address the gap between aspirations for ADM and actuality, with feasible coproduced ADM resources. Methods: We used focus groups and consultation to explore experience and views of stakeholders on ADM processes and materials. Discussions included feedback on an ADM template which was adapted accordingly throughout the research process. Results: Between September 2017 and December 2019, 94 individuals, representing stakeholders advised on design and process of ADM, alongside wider discussion at stakeholder events. Collaborative ADM was universally supported. Valued outcomes were diverse and combining aspirations with practicality required resolving dilemmas. A prototype template and guidance, the PACT (Preferences and Advance decisions for Crisis and Treatment) was co-produced, designed to help manage fluctuating mental capacity through collaborative decision making. The PACT enables direct engagement with medico-legal frameworks, with provision to facilitate person-centred assessments, treatment refusals and requests. Resources including supported engagement and cross-agency awareness and accessibility were seen as essential. Conclusion: Our research confirms high stakeholder motivation to engage in ADM is hampered by multiple barriers. We identified enabling conditions for ADM and co-produced an ADM template and guidance which supports achievement of a range of valued outcomes. Further developments to support and evaluate the process of implementation are now needed to prepare for statutory change.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Stakeholder engagement in the co-production of knowledge for environmental decision-making
    Gerlak, Andrea K.
    Guido, Zack
    Owen, Gigi
    McGoffin, Mariana Sofia Rodriguez
    Louder, Elena
    Davies, Julia
    Smith, Kelly Jay
    Zimmer, Andy
    Murveit, Anna M.
    Meadow, Alison
    Shrestha, Padmendra
    Joshi, Nupur
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 170
  • [2] Co-created decision-making: From co-production to value co-creation in health care
    Amorim, Jason
    Ventura, Andrea Cardoso
    JOURNAL OF MEDICINE ACCESS, 2023, 7
  • [3] A balancing act: navigating the nuances of co-production in mental health research
    Sophie Soklaridis
    Holly Harris
    Rowen Shier
    Jordana Rovet
    Georgia Black
    Gail Bellissimo
    Sam Gruszecki
    Elizabeth Lin
    Anna Di Giandomenico
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 10 (1)
  • [4] Developing a model of co-production: The Supported Decision-Making Training Initiative
    Roper, Catherine
    Houghton, James
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2014, 23 : 35 - 35
  • [5] Overcoming barriers during the co-production of climate information for decision-making
    Briley, Laura
    Brown, Daniel
    Kalafatis, Scott E.
    CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT, 2015, 9 : 41 - 49
  • [6] Advance decision-making in mental health - Suggestions for legal reform in England and Wales
    Owen, G. S.
    Gergel, T.
    Stephenson, L. A.
    Hussain, O.
    Rifkin, L.
    Keene, A. Ruck
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 64 : 162 - 177
  • [7] Design-led Approach to Co-production of Values for Collective Decision-Making
    Raman, Sneha
    French, Tara
    Tulloch, Angela
    DESIGN JOURNAL, 2017, 20 : S4331 - S4342
  • [8] Lessons learned in knowledge co-production for climate-smart decision-making
    Rosemartin, Alyssa
    Crimmins, Theresa M.
    Gerst, Katharine L.
    Posthumus, Erin E.
    Ramirez, Aaron R.
    Wallace, Cynthia S. A.
    Morelli, Toni Lyn
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2023, 141 : 178 - 187
  • [9] Knowledge co-production for decision-making in human-natural systems under uncertainty
    Moallemi, Enayat A.
    Zare, Fateme
    Hebinck, Aniek
    Szetey, Katrina
    Molina-Perez, Edmundo
    Zyngier, Romy L.
    Hadjikakou, Michalis
    Kwakkel, Jan
    Haasnoot, Marjolijn
    Miller, Kelly K.
    Groves, David G.
    Leith, Peat
    Bryan, Brett A.
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2023, 82
  • [10] The opportunity and challenge of trust and decision-making uncertainty Managing co-production in value co-creation
    Wu, Li-Wei
    Wang, Chung-Yu
    Rouyer, Ellen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BANK MARKETING, 2020, 38 (01) : 199 - 218