Subversive Subjects: Rule-Breaking and Deception in Clinical Trials

被引:25
|
作者
Dresser, Rebecca [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS | 2013年 / 41卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS; HEALTHY-SUBJECTS; VOLUNTEERS; ETHICS; PREFERENCES; ADHERENCE; REMEDY;
D O I
10.1111/jlme.12093
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Research subjects do not always conform to research requirements. When their personal interests conflict with the demands of participation, some subjects surreptitiously break the rules. These subjects are subversive they undermine the research endeavor. In rejecting the restrictions research imposes, subversive subjects diminish the value of research results. From one vantage point, subversive subjects engage in unethical behavior. They create risks to themselves and others; they also disregard ethical responsibilities to adhere to research agreements and tell the truth. At the same time, subversive subjects expose ethical problems in the design and conduct of clinical trials. Features of the research environment create fertile ground for subject subversion. Intensified policing and guidance are two common strategies for reducing subject subversion, but collaborative reforms are more consistent with the partnership model of clinical research.
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 840
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Collective rule-breaking
    Krause, Jens
    Romanczuk, Pawel
    Cracco, Emiel
    Arlidge, William
    Nassauer, Anne
    Brass, Marcel
    TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (12) : 1082 - 1095
  • [2] Search for rule-breaking electrons
    Porcelli, Alessio
    NATURE PHYSICS, 2024, 20 (07) : 1043 - 1044
  • [3] The Effect of Relative Performance Information, Peers' Rule-breaking, and Controls on Employees' own Rule-breaking
    Ewelt-Knauer, Corinna
    Knauer, Thorsten
    Sharp, David
    EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2020, 29 (05) : 927 - 948
  • [4] The construct validity of rule-breaking and aggression in an adult clinical sample
    Hopwood, Christopher J.
    Burt, S. Alexandra
    Markowitz, John C.
    Yen, Shirley
    Shea, M. Tracie
    Sanislow, Charles A.
    Grilo, Carlos M.
    Ansell, Emily B.
    McGlashan, Thomas H.
    Gunderson, John G.
    Zanarini, Mary C.
    Skodol, Andrew E.
    Morey, Leslie C.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2009, 43 (08) : 803 - 808
  • [5] Excuse validation: a study in rule-breaking
    John Turri
    Peter Blouw
    Philosophical Studies, 2015, 172 : 615 - 634
  • [6] Women, Rule-Breaking, and The Triple Bind
    Carbone, June
    Cahn, Naomi
    Levit, Nancy
    GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW, 2019, 87 (05) : 1105 - 1162
  • [7] Excuse validation: a study in rule-breaking
    Turri, John
    Blouw, Peter
    PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2015, 172 (03) : 615 - 634
  • [8] Rule-Following and Rule-Breaking: Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein
    Watts, Daniel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2017, 25 (04) : 1159 - 1185
  • [9] MATERIALS SCIENCE Rule-breaking perovskites
    Saba, Michele
    NATURE, 2018, 553 (7687) : 163 - +
  • [10] Prosocial rule-breaking: a systematic literature review
    Malik, Lubna Rashid
    Mishra, Madhurima
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM INSIGHTS, 2024, 7 (02) : 763 - 782