From research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach

被引:20
|
作者
Poot, Charlotte C. [1 ]
van der Kleij, Rianne M. [1 ]
Brakema, Evelyn A. [1 ]
Vermond, Debbie [1 ]
Williams, Sian [2 ]
Cragg, Liza [2 ]
van den Broek, Jos M. [3 ]
Chavannes, Niels H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Albinusdreef 2,Postbus 9600 Zone V-0-P, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] IPCRG, POB 11961, Westhill, Scotland
[3] Leiden Univ, Dept Sci Commun & Soc, POB 9505, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
implementation science; knowledge translation; policy making; public health; science communication; PUBLIC-HEALTH; POLICY-MAKERS; KNOWLEDGE-TRANSLATION; IMPLEMENTATION; SCIENTISTS; MESSAGES; SCIENCE; BUILD;
D O I
10.1093/pubmed/fdx153
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Knowledge creation forms an integral part of the knowledge-to-action framework aimed at bridging the gap between research and evidence-informed decision making. Although principles of science communication, data visualisation and user-centred design largely impact the effectiveness of communication, their role in knowledge creation is still limited. Hence, this article aims to provide researchers a systematic approach on how knowledge creation can be put into practice. Methods A systematic two-phased approach towards knowledge creation was formulated and executed. First, during a preparation phase the purpose and audience of the knowledge were defined. Subsequently, a developmental phase facilitated how the content is 'said' (language) and communicated (channel). This developmental phase proceeded via two pathways: a translational cycle and design cycle, during which core translational and design components were incorporated. The entire approach was demonstrated by a case study. Results The case study demonstrated how the phases in this systematic approach can be operationalised. It furthermore illustrated how created knowledge can be delivered. Conclusion The proposed approach offers researchers a systematic, practical and easy-to-implement tool to facilitate effective knowledge creation towards decision-makers in healthcare. Through the integration of core components of knowledge creation evidence-informed decision making will ultimately be optimized.
引用
收藏
页码:I3 / I12
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evidence-informed decision-making in sustainable tourism: from research to action
    Volgger, Michael
    Cheer, Joseph
    Pforr, Christof
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TOURISM, 2025,
  • [2] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Considerations for Evidence-Informed Decision Making
    Palisano, Robert J.
    PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN PEDIATRICS, 2015, 35 (03) : 213 - 217
  • [3] Dialysis in Africa: the need for evidence-informed decision making
    Crosby, Liam
    Baker, Peter
    Hangoma, Peter
    Barasa, Edwine
    Hamidi, Vida
    Chalkidou, Kalipso
    LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 8 (04): : E476 - E477
  • [4] Measures of evidence-informed decision-making competence attributes: a psychometric systematic review
    Emily Belita
    Janet E. Squires
    Jennifer Yost
    Rebecca Ganann
    Trish Burnett
    Maureen Dobbins
    BMC Nursing, 19
  • [5] Strategies to implement evidence-informed decision making at the organizational level: a rapid systematic review
    Clark, Emily C.
    Burnett, Trish
    Blair, Rebecca
    Traynor, Robyn L.
    Hagerman, Leah
    Dobbins, Maureen
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [6] Measures of evidence-informed decision-making competence attributes: a psychometric systematic review
    Belita, Emily
    Squires, Janet E.
    Yost, Jennifer
    Ganann, Rebecca
    Burnett, Trish
    Dobbins, Maureen
    BMC NURSING, 2020, 19 (01)
  • [7] Strategies to implement evidence-informed decision making at the organizational level: a rapid systematic review
    Emily C. Clark
    Trish Burnett
    Rebecca Blair
    Robyn L. Traynor
    Leah Hagerman
    Maureen Dobbins
    BMC Health Services Research, 24
  • [8] Making a case for evidence-informed decision making for participatory urban design
    Nisha, Bobby
    Nelson, Margaret
    URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 17 (04) : 336 - 348
  • [9] Making a case for evidence-informed decision making for participatory urban design
    Bobby Nisha
    Margaret Nelson
    URBAN DESIGN International, 2012, 17 : 336 - 348
  • [10] Challenges of partnership research: insights from a collaborative partnership in evidence-informed public health decision making
    Traynor, Robyn
    Dobbins, Maureen
    DeCorby, Kara
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2015, 11 (01): : 99 - 109