Approaches to Improving Healthcare Delivery by Multi-Stakeholder Alliances

被引:0
|
作者
McHugh, Megan C. [5 ,6 ]
Harvey, Jillian B. [4 ]
Aseyev, Dasha [2 ]
Alexander, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
Beich, Jeff [3 ]
Scanlon, Dennis P. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Ctr Hlth Care & Policy Res, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Jeff Beich Consulting, Grand Isl, NY USA
[4] Penn State Univ, Dept Hlth Policy & Adm, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Inst Healthcare Studies, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[6] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE | 2012年 / 18卷 / 06期
关键词
ALIGNING FORCES; QUALITY; FRAMEWORK; SERVICES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Our purposes were: (1) to describe how 14 multi-stakeholder alliances participating in the Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) initiative approached the charge of improving healthcare delivery at the community level between 2006 and 2010; and (2) to offer insights to policy makers and program planners seeking to promote or establish communitywide quality improvement (QI). Study Design: This was a qualitative study. Methods: A total of 84 semi-structured interviews were conducted with AF4Q alliance leaders between 2006 and 2010, and an iterative coding process was used to identify salient themes. Program documents supplemented the interview data and were used to develop an inventory of the alliances' QI activities using the Leatherman and Sutherland taxonomy of quality-enhancing interventions. Results: Alliances spent years planning their QI approaches and activities. Initial selection of QI activities was driven by the availability of local expertise and resources, rather than alignment with a communitywide vision for quality. Alliances were just as likely to rely on local partners to lead QI activities as they were to establish their own activities. The most commonly adopted QI activities were collaboratives aimed at producing organizational-level changes. Conclusions: Policy makers and program planners seeking to promote communitywide QI should consider developing clear expectations, offering technical assistance at the start of the program, providing information on the evidence base for QI activities, and highlighting additional funding opportunities that could support QI activities. Alliances may need a stronger push to move beyond coordinated, organizational-level activities to more community-focused, cross-organizational QI activities. (Am J Manag Care. 2012;18:S156-S162)
引用
收藏
页码:S156 / S162
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aligning Forces for Quality Multi-Stakeholder Healthcare Alliances: Do They Have a Sustainable Future?
    Alexander, Jeffrey A.
    Hearld, Larry R.
    Wolf, Laura J.
    Vanderbrink, Jocelyn M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2016, 22 (12): : S423 - S433
  • [2] Improving Transparency in Service Delivery to Fight Corruption? Mapping Multi-Stakeholder Voices on Digitization in the Indian Public Healthcare Sector
    Chakraborty, Anwesha
    Kubbe, Ina
    AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2024,
  • [3] Decentralized Approaches Disrupt Multi-Stakeholder Activities
    Reed, Harvey
    Dailey, Nathaniel
    DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION SCIENCES VII, 2023, 12542
  • [4] Multi-stakeholder engagement for sustainable bridge delivery
    Zhang, Chao
    Canning, Lee
    Dubois, Leonie
    Vipham, Marc
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 164 (03) : 197 - 211
  • [5] Municipal service delivery: A multi-stakeholder framework
    Messinger, Paul R.
    HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN MANUFACTURING & SERVICE INDUSTRIES, 2013, 23 (01) : 37 - 46
  • [6] From Rhetoric to Reality: Consumer Engagement in 16 Multi-Stakeholder Alliances
    Berwick, Donald M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2016, 22 (12): : S330 - S332
  • [7] A multi-stakeholder perspective on sustainable healthcare: From 2030 onwards
    Pereno, Amina
    Eriksson, Daniel
    FUTURES, 2020, 122
  • [8] At the Crossroads: Multi-Stakeholder and Multi-Disciplinary Approaches in the Application of IHL
    Durham, Helen
    Quintin, Anne
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LEGAL STUDIES, 2023, 14 (01) : 31 - 47
  • [9] Multi-stakeholder engagement
    Blenkus, M. Gabrijelcic
    Kronegger, L.
    Pushkarev, N.
    Robnik, M.
    Sotlar, I.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30
  • [10] Multi-Owner Multi-Stakeholder Access Control Model for a Healthcare Environment
    Karimi, Leila
    Joshi, James
    2017 IEEE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COLLABORATION AND INTERNET COMPUTING (CIC), 2017, : 359 - 368