Older Cancer Patients' User Experiences With Web-Based Health Information Tools: A Think-Aloud Study

被引:83
|
作者
Bolle, Sifra [1 ]
Romijn, Geke [1 ,2 ]
Smets, Ellen M. A. [3 ]
Loos, Eugene F. [1 ]
Kunneman, Marleen [3 ,4 ]
van Weert, Julia C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res ASCoR, Dept Commun Sci, POB 15791, NL-1001 NG Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Behav & Movement Sci, Dept Clin Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Med Psychol, AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Dept Med Decis Making, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
user experience; eHealth; usability; think aloud; aging; cancer; INTERNET USERS; DECISION AIDS; USABILITY; IMPROVE; COMMUNICATION; TECHNOLOGY; EDUCATION; CARE;
D O I
10.2196/jmir.5618
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Health information is increasingly presented on the Internet. Several Web design guidelines for older Web users have been proposed; however, these guidelines are often not applied in website development. Furthermore, although we know that older individuals use the Internet to search for health information, we lack knowledge on how they use and evaluate Web-based health information. Objective: This study evaluates user experiences with existing Web-based health information tools among older (>= 65 years) cancer patients and survivors and their partners. The aim was to gain insight into usability issues and the perceived usefulness of cancer-related Web-based health information tools. Methods: We conducted video-recorded think-aloud observations for 7 Web-based health information tools, specifically 3 websites providing cancer-related information, 3 Web-based question prompt lists (QPLs), and 1 values clarification tool, with colorectal cancer patients or survivors (n= 15) and their partners (n= 8) (median age: 73; interquartile range 70-79). Participants were asked to think aloud while performing search, evaluation, and application tasks using the Web-based health information tools. Results: Overall, participants perceived Web-based health information tools as highly useful and indicated a willingness to use such tools. However, they experienced problems in terms of usability and perceived usefulness due to difficulties in using navigational elements, shortcomings in the layout, a lack of instructions on how to use the tools, difficulties with comprehensibility, and a large amount of variety in terms of the preferred amount of information. Although participants frequently commented that it was easy for them to find requested information, we observed that the large majority of the participants were not able to find it. Conclusions: Overall, older cancer patients appreciate and are able to use cancer information websites. However, this study shows the importance of maintaining awareness of age-related problems such as cognitive and functional decline and navigation difficulties with this target group in mind. The results of this study can be used to design usable and useful Web-based health information tools for older (cancer) patients.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Response to "Older Cancer Patients' User Experiences With Web-Based Health Information Tools: A Think-Aloud Study"
    Gokani, Shyam Ajay
    Kerry, Georgina
    Sharma, Ekta
    Ash, Javier
    Zargaran, Alexander Kamiar
    Rasasingam, Dara Shalini
    Mittal, Aaina
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (11) : 216 - 217
  • [2] Authors' Reply: Response to "Older Cancer Patients' User Experiences With Web-Based Health Information Tools: A Think-Aloud Study"
    Bolle, Sifra
    Romijn, Geke
    Smets, Ellen M. A.
    Loos, Eugene F.
    Kunneman, Marleen
    van Weert, Julia C. M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (11) : 218 - 219
  • [3] Cancer Patients' Use of the Internet to Search for Health Information: A Think-Aloud Study
    Huijgens, Fiorella
    Kwakman, Pascale
    Smets, Ellen
    Linn, Annemiek
    van Weert, Julia
    Hillen, Marij
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2023, 109 : 128 - 128
  • [4] How Patients With Cancer Use the Internet to Search for Health Information: Scenario-Based Think-Aloud Study
    Huijgens, Fiorella
    Kwakman, Pascale
    Hillen, Marij
    van Weert, Julia
    Jaspers, Monique
    Smets, Ellen
    Linn, Annemiek
    JMIR INFODEMIOLOGY, 2025, 5
  • [5] User Interactions With Health Insurance Decision Aids: User Study With Retrospective Think-Aloud Interviews
    Giang, Wayne C. W.
    Bland, Emma
    Chen, Jeffrey
    Colon-Morales, Coralys M.
    Alvarado, Michelle M.
    JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2021, 8 (04):
  • [6] Think-aloud Protocols: Analyzing Three Different Think-aloud Protocols with Counts of Verbalized Frustrations in a Usability Study of an Information-rich Web Site
    Olmsted-Hawala, Erica L.
    Murphy, Elizabeth D.
    Hawala, Sam
    Ashenfelter, Kathleen T.
    2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE, 2010, : 60 - 66
  • [7] Influence of prevalence and severity on affective processing of health risk information: A think-aloud study
    Hevey, D.
    Egan, G.
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2009, 24 : 204 - 204
  • [8] Usability testing of an electronic pain monitoring system for palliative cancer patients: A think-aloud study
    Taylor, Sally
    Allsop, Matthew J.
    Bennett, Michael I.
    Bewick, Bridgette M.
    HEALTH INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (03) : 1133 - 1147
  • [9] New Ways for Patients to Make Sense of Their Electronic Health Record Data Using the Discovery Web Application: Think-Aloud Evaluation Study
    Nakikj, Drashko
    Kreda, David
    Gehlenborg, Nils
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2023, 7
  • [10] How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think-aloud study
    Smith, Samuel G.
    Vart, Gemma
    Wolf, Michael S.
    Obichere, Austin
    Baker, Helen J.
    Raine, Rosalind
    Wardle, Jane
    von Wagner, Christian
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (05) : 703 - 714