Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones: Does the presence and degree of hydronephrosis affect success?

被引:36
|
作者
Seitz, C [1 ]
Fajkovic, H [1 ]
Waldert, M [1 ]
Tanovic, E [1 ]
Remzi, M [1 ]
Kramer, G [1 ]
Marberger, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Urol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
SWL; urolithiasis; proximal ureter; hydronephrosis; stone clearance;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2005.09.022
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: We investigated the relation between the presence and degree of stone induced hydronephrosis and the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in patients with solitary proximal ureteral stones. Methods: 130 patients with or without hydronephrosis were treated with SWL. The degree of hydronephrosis was defined by renal ultrasound. Patients were divided into four groups according to the degree of stone induced hydronephrosis. Group 0 (24%) had no urinary system dilatation, group 1 (31.2%) had a mild dilatation of the renal pelvis, group 2 (40%) had a moderate and group 3 (4.8%) a severe dilatation of the renal pelvis and calices. The stone size, number of shock waves applied and number of sessions required to achieve stone clearance were recorded. Results: Mean stone size was 8.2 mm +/- 2.5 mm. Mean time to stone clearance was 13.7 days +/- 16.3. In 74.4% of patients stone clearance was observed. Additional 4.8% harbored residual fragments <= 3 mm after 3 months. Differences among the four groups in terms of stone size, time to stone clearance and treatment failure were not significant. Conclusions: The presence or degree of hydronephrosis caused by a proximal ureteral stone does not affect the time to stone clearance or success rate after SWL. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 383
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Does degree of hydronephrosis affect success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral stones?
    El-Assmy, Ahmed
    El-Nahas, Ahmed R.
    Youssef, Ramy F.
    El-Hefnawy, Ahmed S.
    Sheir, Khaled Z.
    UROLOGY, 2007, 69 (03) : 431 - 435
  • [3] Does the degree of stone-induced hydronephrosis affect the outcome of shock-wave lithotripsy in patients with proximal ureteral stones?
    Abuelnaga, Mahmoud
    Alsadoun, Lara
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 39 (02): : 415 - 420
  • [4] Can intervals in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy sessions affect success in the treatment of upper ureteral stones?
    Turan, Turgay
    Efioglu, Ozgur
    Danacioglu, Yavuz Onur
    Sendogan, Furkan
    Culpan, Meftun
    Gunaydin, Bilal
    Atis, Ramazan Gokhan
    Caskurlu, Turhan
    Yildirim, Asif
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2018, 13 (04) : 507 - 511
  • [5] Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Ureteral Stones : a Critique on Success Rate
    Barzegarnezhad, Ayoub
    Kerigh, Behzad Feizzadeh
    Azizi, Fariborz
    AMBIENT SCIENCE, 2016, 3
  • [6] Complementary Ureterorenoscopy after extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in proximal ureteral stones: success and complications
    Demirelli, Erhan
    Ogreden, Ercan
    Tok, Dogan Sabri
    Demiray, Ozay
    Karadayi, Mehmet
    Oguz, Ural
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2022, 68 (08): : 1068 - 1072
  • [7] EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY OF PROXIMAL AND DISTAL URETERAL STONES
    PETTERSSON, B
    TISELIUS, HG
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1988, 14 (03) : 184 - 188
  • [8] Impact of the degree of hydronephrosis on the efficacy of in situ extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for proximal ureteral calculi
    El-Assmy, Ahmed
    El-Nahas, Ahmed R.
    Youssef, Ramy F.
    El-Hefnawy, Ahmed S.
    Sheir, Khaled Z.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2007, 41 (03): : 208 - 213
  • [10] Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of renal and ureteral stones
    Miranda Torricelli, Fabio Cesar
    Danilovic, Alexandre
    Vicentini, Fabio Carvalho
    Marchini, Giovanni Scala
    Srougi, Miguel
    Mazzucchi, Eduardo
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2015, 61 (01): : 65 - 71