共 50 条
Multimodality Salvage of Recurrent Disease After Local Excision for Rectal Cancer
被引:39
|作者:
You, Y. Nancy
[1
]
Roses, Robert E.
[1
]
Chang, George J.
[1
]
Rodriguez-Bigas, Miguel A.
[1
]
Feig, Barry W.
[1
]
Slack, Rebecca
[2
]
Sa Nguyen
[1
]
Skibber, John M.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77230 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77230 USA
关键词:
Local excision;
Rectal cancer;
Recurrence;
Salvage surgery;
Sphincter preservation;
Transanal excision;
TRANSANAL ENDOSCOPIC MICROSURGERY;
QUALITY-OF-LIFE;
UNITED-STATES;
RADICAL RESECTION;
SURGERY;
CHEMORADIATION;
THERAPY;
RADIOTHERAPY;
PROCTECTOMY;
IMMEDIATE;
D O I:
10.1097/DCR.0b013e318270837f
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
BACKGROUND: Local excision, alone or in combination with chemoradiation, is increasingly considered for rectal cancer. Higher risks of disease recurrence have been demonstrated after local excision. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the outcomes of current-era multimodality salvage for recurrent rectal cancer after local excision. DESIGN: This was a single-institutional retrospective study. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a tertiary-referral cancer center between 1993 and 2011. PATIENTS: Forty-six patients with recurrent rectal cancer after initial local excision were included. INTERVENTION: Multimodality salvage treatment was performed as appropriate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the pattern of disease recurrence, salvage treatments, and resultant overall and re-recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: After the initial local excision, recurrent disease was diagnosed after a median interval of 1.9 years: local/regionally in 67%, distantly in 18%, and both in 15%. Four patients (9%) had recurrence that was unsalvageable, 2 (4%) declined treatment, and 40 (87%) underwent surgical salvage. Preoperative chemoradiation was given in 30 (75%) patients. The R0 resection rate was 80%, requiring multivisceral resection (33%), total pelvic exenteration (5%), and metastasectomy (25%). The rate of sphincter preservation was 33%, and perioperative morbidity was 50%. The first site of failure after salvage was distant in 38% and was local only in 10%. The 5-year overall and 3-year re-recurrence-free survival were 63% and 43%. Pathologic stage at initial local excision, receipt of neoadjuvant chemoradiation before local excision, recurrence pattern after local excision, pathologic stage at salvage, and R0 resection at salvage influenced rerecurrence-free survival. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the referral and selection biases inherent in a small study cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Failure after local excision for rectal cancer may not be salvageable. When feasible, multimodality treatment, including multivisceral resection, pelvic irradiation, and chemotherapy, was associated with potentially lasting treatment-related morbidities and only modest success in long-term disease control. These findings should be compared with the expected stage-specific outcomes of standard proctectomy for early-stage rectal cancer, when local excision is being considered.
引用
收藏
页码:1213 / 1219
页数:7
相关论文