共 50 条
Electronic Diabetes Management System Replaces Paper Insulin Chart: Improved Quality in Diabetes Inpatient Care Processes Due to Digitalization
被引:2
|作者:
Kopanz, Julia
[1
]
Lichtenegger, Katharina M.
[1
]
Koenig, Constanze
[2
]
Libiseller, Angela
[1
]
Mader, Julia K.
[1
]
Donsa, Klaus
[2
]
Truskaller, Thomas
[2
]
Bauer, Norbert
[3
]
Hahn, Brigitte
[4
]
Sendlhofer, Gerald
[5
]
Beck, Peter
[6
]
Holl, Bernhard
[6
]
Sinner, Frank
[1
,2
]
Feichtner, Franz
[2
]
Pieber, Thomas R.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Med Univ Graz, Dept Internal Med, Div Endocrinol & Diabetol, Graz, Austria
[2] JOANNEUM RES Forsch Gesell mbH, HLTH, Inst Biomed & Hlth Sci, Neue Stiftingtalstr 2, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[3] LKH Hartberg, Dept Internal Med, Hartberg, Austria
[4] LKH Hartberg, Hartberg, Austria
[5] Med Univ Graz, Dept Surg, Div Plast Aesthet & Reconstruct Surg, Res Unit Safety Hlth, Graz, Austria
[6] Decide Clin Software GmbH, Graz, Austria
来源:
关键词:
diabetes;
clinical decision support;
diabetes therapy;
digitalization;
hospital;
treatment quality;
D O I:
10.1177/1932296820957043
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Background: GlucoTab, an electronic diabetes management system (eDMS), supports healthcare professionals (HCPs) in inpatient blood glucose (BG) management at point-of-care and was implemented for the first time under routine conditions in a regional hospital to replace the paper insulin chart. Method: To investigate quality of the eDMS for inpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus a monocentric retrospective before-after evaluation was conducted. We compared documentation possibilities by assessing a blank paper chart vs the eDMS user interface. Further quality aspects were compared by assessing filled-in paper charts (n=106) vs filled-in eDMS documentation (n=241). HCPs (n=59) were interviewed regarding eDMS satisfaction. Results: The eDMS represented an improvement of documentation possibilities by offering a more structured and comprehensive user interface compared to the blank paper chart. The number of good diabetes days averaged to a median value of four days in both groups (paper chart: 4.38 [0-7] vs eDMS: 4.38 [0-7] days). Median daily BG was 170 (117-297) mg/dL vs 168 (86-286) mg/dL and median fasting BG was 152 (95-285) mg/dL vs 145 (69-333) mg/dL, and 0.1% vs 0.4% BG values <54mg/dL were documented. Diabetes documentation quality improved when using eDMS, for example, documentation of ordered BG measurement frequency (1% vs 100%) and ordered BG targets (0% vs 100%). HCPs stated that by using eDMS errors could be prevented (74%), and digital support of work processes was completed (77%). Time saving was noted by 8 out of 11 HCPs and estimated at 10-15minutes per patient day by two HCPs. Conclusions: The eDMS completely replaced the paper chart, showed comparable glycemic control, was positively accepted by HCPs, and is suitable for inpatient diabetes management.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 230
页数:9
相关论文