Electronic Diabetes Management System Replaces Paper Insulin Chart: Improved Quality in Diabetes Inpatient Care Processes Due to Digitalization

被引:2
|
作者
Kopanz, Julia [1 ]
Lichtenegger, Katharina M. [1 ]
Koenig, Constanze [2 ]
Libiseller, Angela [1 ]
Mader, Julia K. [1 ]
Donsa, Klaus [2 ]
Truskaller, Thomas [2 ]
Bauer, Norbert [3 ]
Hahn, Brigitte [4 ]
Sendlhofer, Gerald [5 ]
Beck, Peter [6 ]
Holl, Bernhard [6 ]
Sinner, Frank [1 ,2 ]
Feichtner, Franz [2 ]
Pieber, Thomas R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Graz, Dept Internal Med, Div Endocrinol & Diabetol, Graz, Austria
[2] JOANNEUM RES Forsch Gesell mbH, HLTH, Inst Biomed & Hlth Sci, Neue Stiftingtalstr 2, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[3] LKH Hartberg, Dept Internal Med, Hartberg, Austria
[4] LKH Hartberg, Hartberg, Austria
[5] Med Univ Graz, Dept Surg, Div Plast Aesthet & Reconstruct Surg, Res Unit Safety Hlth, Graz, Austria
[6] Decide Clin Software GmbH, Graz, Austria
来源
关键词
diabetes; clinical decision support; diabetes therapy; digitalization; hospital; treatment quality;
D O I
10.1177/1932296820957043
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: GlucoTab, an electronic diabetes management system (eDMS), supports healthcare professionals (HCPs) in inpatient blood glucose (BG) management at point-of-care and was implemented for the first time under routine conditions in a regional hospital to replace the paper insulin chart. Method: To investigate quality of the eDMS for inpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus a monocentric retrospective before-after evaluation was conducted. We compared documentation possibilities by assessing a blank paper chart vs the eDMS user interface. Further quality aspects were compared by assessing filled-in paper charts (n=106) vs filled-in eDMS documentation (n=241). HCPs (n=59) were interviewed regarding eDMS satisfaction. Results: The eDMS represented an improvement of documentation possibilities by offering a more structured and comprehensive user interface compared to the blank paper chart. The number of good diabetes days averaged to a median value of four days in both groups (paper chart: 4.38 [0-7] vs eDMS: 4.38 [0-7] days). Median daily BG was 170 (117-297) mg/dL vs 168 (86-286) mg/dL and median fasting BG was 152 (95-285) mg/dL vs 145 (69-333) mg/dL, and 0.1% vs 0.4% BG values <54mg/dL were documented. Diabetes documentation quality improved when using eDMS, for example, documentation of ordered BG measurement frequency (1% vs 100%) and ordered BG targets (0% vs 100%). HCPs stated that by using eDMS errors could be prevented (74%), and digital support of work processes was completed (77%). Time saving was noted by 8 out of 11 HCPs and estimated at 10-15minutes per patient day by two HCPs. Conclusions: The eDMS completely replaced the paper chart, showed comparable glycemic control, was positively accepted by HCPs, and is suitable for inpatient diabetes management.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 230
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benefits of a Diabetes-Management-System in inpatient Care
    Hochfellner, Daniel Alexander
    Ziko, Haris
    Beck, Peter
    Sendlhofer, Gerald
    Mader, Julia
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2019, 131 : S441 - S441
  • [2] Care Management Processes Important for High-Quality Diabetes Care
    Peterson, Kevin A.
    Carlin, Caroline S.
    Solberg, Leif I.
    Normington, James
    Lock, Eric F.
    DIABETES CARE, 2023, 46 (10) : 1762 - 1769
  • [3] The impact of a diabetes electronic management system (DEMS) on the process of diabetes care in general practice
    Smith, SA
    Dinneen, SF
    Gorman, CA
    Zimmermann, BR
    Bjornsen, SS
    Hanson, PL
    Jorgensen, BK
    Bauer, C
    Bills, A
    Drake, J
    Bryant, SC
    DIABETES, 2000, 49 : A224 - A224
  • [4] Impact of a diabetes electronic management system on the care of patients seen in a subspeciality diabetes clinic
    Smith, SA
    Gorman, CA
    Murphy, ME
    Zimmerman, BR
    Huschka, TR
    Rizza, RA
    Dinneen, SF
    Naessens, JM
    DIABETES CARE, 1998, 21 (06) : 972 - 976
  • [5] Clinician's opinions of a new inpatient care pathway, the Diabetes Inpatient Care and Education (DICE) chart, containing a unique referral system, the Diabetes Patient at Risk (DPAR) score
    Round, R. M.
    Kerry, C.
    Rajendran, R.
    Anscomb, N.
    Laflin, S.
    Rayman, G.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2014, 31 : 133 - 133
  • [6] The impact of planned care and a diabetes electronic management system on community-based diabetes care - The Mayo Health System Diabetes Translation Project
    Montori, VM
    Dinneen, SF
    Gorman, CA
    Zimmerman, BR
    Rizza, RA
    Bjornsen, SS
    Green, EM
    Bryant, SC
    Smith, SA
    DIABETES CARE, 2002, 25 (11) : 1952 - 1957
  • [7] Improving the quality of inpatient diabetes care: the importance of understanding the whole care system and its complexity
    Cox, A.
    Lim, R.
    Anderson, J.
    Malik, R.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2014, 31 : 130 - 130
  • [8] Staff knowledge on inpatient diabetes care following a newly established glucose monitoring chart with condensed management guide
    Avari, P.
    Reeder, C.
    Kerrigan, W.
    Siddiqui, M.
    Bertok, S.
    Duraisingham, S.
    Hui, E.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2018, 35 : 94 - 94
  • [9] Impact of a diabetes electronic management system on patient care in a community clinic
    East, J
    Krishnamurthy, P
    Freed, B
    Nosovitski, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2003, 18 (04) : 150 - 154
  • [10] Performance of an Electronic Diary System for Intensive Insulin Management in Global Diabetes Clinical Trials
    Bastyr, Edward J., III
    Zhang, Shuyu
    Mou, Jiani
    Hackett, Andy P.
    Raymond, Stephen A.
    Chang, Annette M.
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 17 (08) : 571 - 579