The impact on families of pediatric resident departure from a continuity clinic practice

被引:9
|
作者
Serwint, JR [1 ]
Wasserman, BJ [1 ]
Chernoff, RG [1 ]
机构
[1] JOHNS HOPKINS CHILDRENS CTR,DEPT PEDIAT,BALTIMORE,MD
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archpedi.1997.02170440041007
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine views of parents whose children were reassigned to new resident pediatricians at a continuity clinic because their previous pediatricians had completed residency. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Hospital-based resident continuity clinic. Participants: Ninety parents whose pediatricians were graduating were interviewed from June through August 1995. Results: Most parents felt they knew their resident pediatrician well and that the resident knew their child well. Sixty-eight parents (76%) were sad about the transition, 33 (37%) were angry, 30 (33%) felt abandoned, and 6 (7%) were relieved. Three fourths of the parents thought it was very important for the family to be involved in the reassignment process, yet less than one fifth had been asked their opinion. Half of the families were experiencing their second or greater transition: Families undergoing their first, vs second or greater transitions, were more likely to feel they knew the resident well (P=.01), and that the resident knew their child well (P=.04). Despite the transitions, 86 (96%) of families stated they would continue to have their child receive medical care at the current site because they knew their child would receive good care. Conclusions: Strong physician-patient-parent relationships develop when residents are the pediatric primary care providers. Parents want to be informed regarding transitions. Pediatricians need to be sensitive to the impact of transitions and to negotiate with families in choosing their future pediatrician. These results have implications for other practice sites where physician turnover occurs.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 683
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing continuity in a pediatric resident continuity clinic with a private pediatric practice.
    Ector, WL
    Fields, JB
    Quattlebaum, TG
    Davis, DS
    Darden, PM
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 1999, 47 (02) : 140A - 140A
  • [2] Resident and family continuity in pediatric continuity clinic: Nine years of observation
    Garfunkel, LC
    Byrd, RS
    McConnochie, KM
    Auinger, P
    PEDIATRICS, 1998, 101 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [3] Pediatric resident continuity experience transferred from a traditional hospital clinic to community practices: A resident evaluation
    Specht, EM
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2003, 53 (04) : 103A - 103A
  • [4] Factors Influencing Pediatric Resident Exposure to Adolescents in their Continuity Clinic
    Price, Laura S.
    Cao, Lisa A.
    Ott, Mary A.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2018, 197 : 297 - 299
  • [5] CYSTIC FIBROSIS CLINIC AS A FRAMEWORK FOR PEDIATRIC RESIDENT CONTINUITY OF CARE
    Staples, H.
    Brown, D.
    Brown, D.
    Dominick, S.
    St John, K.
    PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 484 - 484
  • [6] Screening for Social Determinants of Health in Pediatric Resident Continuity Clinic
    Morgenlander, Marcia A.
    Tyrrell, Hollyce
    Garfunkel, Lynn C.
    Serwint, Janet R.
    Steiner, Michael J.
    Schilling, Samantha
    ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2019, 19 (08) : 868 - 874
  • [7] The effect of patient reassignment on future continuity in a pediatric resident continuity practice
    Serwint, JR
    Kumar, G
    ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 1999, 153 (06): : 581 - 585
  • [8] Resident group practice (Continuity clinic): Quality performance and improvement
    Berger, DK
    Gelman, SM
    Moretta, AC
    Dygulska, B
    Schessel, MD
    Sutija, VG
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2000, 47 (04) : 85A - 85A
  • [9] Piloting Group Well Child Visits in Pediatric Resident Continuity Clinic
    Saysana, Michele
    Downs, Stephen M.
    CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 2012, 51 (02) : 134 - 139
  • [10] Introducing continuous quality improvement methodology to a pediatric resident continuity clinic
    Lewin, LO
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2002, 51 (04) : 72A - 72A