All Things Great and Small: Organizational Size, Boundaries of the Firm, and a Changing Environment

被引:95
作者
Josefy, Matthew [1 ]
Kuban, Scott [1 ]
Ireland, R. Duane [1 ]
Hitt, Michael A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Mays Business Sch, Dept Management, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; BOARD COMPOSITION; INTERNATIONAL DIVERSIFICATION; EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE; LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE; SHARED LEADERSHIP; DYNAMIC THEORY; LIFE-CYCLE; PERFORMANCE; CORPORATE;
D O I
10.1080/19416520.2015.1027086
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research findings have established a relationship between organizational size and a substantial set of organizational outcomes, resulting in size's distinction as "perhaps the most powerful explanatory organizational covariate in strategic analysis". We draw on the theory of the firm to provide a theory-driven definition of firm size and as a framework to organize the diverse research on firm size. We examine studies over the last 20 plus years since the last review of research on organizational size that have expanded our understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of larger firms, the environmental factors that have changed the merits of firms relative to markets, the managerial bias to pursue growth, and the most recent findings on the performance implications of organizational size. In doing so, the review provides extensions to our understanding of the theory of the firm, by integrating contingency theory, the resource-based theory of the firm, leadership theories, and the knowledge-based view of the firm. In addition, based on an extensive review of the measurement methodologies for the most common control variable employed by strategy scholars, this review outlines a rich and robust set of opportunities for future research to explore the nature of organizational size and its effects.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 802
页数:88
相关论文
共 267 条
[1]   The Sociological Ambivalence of Bureaucracy: From Weber via Gouldner to Marx [J].
Adler, Paul S. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2012, 23 (01) :244-266
[2]  
Afuah A, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P34
[3]   Dynamic boundaries of the firm: Are firms better off being vertically integrated in the face of a technological change? [J].
Afuah, A .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 44 (06) :1211-1228
[4]  
AGARWAL NC, 1979, ACAD MANAGE J, V22, P404, DOI 10.5465/255598
[5]   The conditioning effect of time on firm survival: An industry life cycle approach [J].
Agarwal, R ;
Sarkar, M ;
Echamebadi, R .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 45 (05) :971-994
[6]   Does entry size matter? The impact of the life cycle and technology on firm survival [J].
Agarwal, R ;
Audretsch, DB .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 49 (01) :21-43
[7]  
Aldrich Howard., 1986, Research in Organizational Behavior, V8, P165, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.1497769
[8]   Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing [J].
Amabile, TM ;
Conti, R .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (06) :630-640
[9]   Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment [J].
Aragon-Correa, JA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1998, 41 (05) :556-567
[10]   Capabilities, Transaction Costs, and Firm Boundaries [J].
Argyres, Nicholas S. ;
Zenger, Todd R. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2012, 23 (06) :1643-1657