The Macroeconomic Effects of Longevity Risk Under Private and Public Insurance and Asymmetric Information

被引:4
|
作者
Heijdra, Ben J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jiang, Yang [1 ]
Mierau, Jochen O. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Fac Econ & Business, POB 800, NL-9700 AV Groningen, Netherlands
[2] CESifo, Munich, Germany
[3] Netspar, Tilburg, Netherlands
来源
ECONOMIST-NETHERLANDS | 2019年 / 167卷 / 02期
关键词
Social security; Annuity market; Adverse selection; Inequality; Redistribution; Overlapping generations; ADVERSE SELECTION; LIFE-INSURANCE; ANNUITIES; MARKET;
D O I
10.1007/s10645-019-09336-y
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We study the impact of a fully-funded social security system in an economy with heterogeneous consumers. The unobservability of individual health conditions leads to adverse selection in the private annuity market. Introducing social securitywhich is immune to adverse selectionaffects capital accumulation and individual welfare depending on its size and on the pension benefit rule that is adopted. If this rule incorporates some implicit or explicit redistribution from healthy to unhealthy individuals then the latter types are better off as a result of the pension system. In the absence of redistribution the public pension system makes everybody worse off in the long run. Though attractive to distant generations, privatization of social security is not generally Pareto improving to all generations.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 213
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条