Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Applying the Least-Squares Monte Carlo Method in Surfactant-Flooding Implementation

被引:8
|
作者
Alkhatib, A. [1 ]
Babaei, M. [2 ]
King, P. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll London, Dept Earth Sci & Engn, London, England
来源
SPE JOURNAL | 2013年 / 18卷 / 04期
关键词
AMERICAN OPTIONS; EOR; SIMULATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.2118/154467-PA
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业];
学科分类号
0820 ;
摘要
This study introduces a decision-making evaluation method for flexibility in surfactant flooding. The method aims to capture the effects of uncertainty in the time series for both technical and economic parameters and produce a near-optimal policy with respect to these uncertainties as they vary with time. The evaluation method used was the least-squares Monte Carlo (LSM) method, which is best-suited for evaluating flexibility in project implementation. The decision analyzed was that of finding the best time to start surfactant flooding during the lifetime of a field under uncertainty. The study was conducted on two reservoir models: a 3D homogeneous model and a 2D heterogeneous model. The technical uncertainties considered were the residual oil saturation (ROS) to the surfactant flood, surfactant adsorption, and reservoir heterogeneity, and the main economic uncertain parameters considered were oil price, surfactant cost, and water-injection and -production costs. The results show that the LSM method provides a decision-making tool that was able to capture the value of flexibility in surfactant-flooding implementation and provides some insight into the effect of uncertainty on decision making, which can help mitigate adverse circumstances should they arise or capture the upside potential if circumstances prove beneficial. The results found that the optimal policy obtained was reliable and that heterogeneity and different well-placement patterns affect the value of flexibility and optimal policy for different reservoir models. Furthermore, possible extensions to enhance the LSM method were discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 735
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Uncertainty Evaluation of Conducted Emission Measurement by the Monte Carlo Method and the Modified Least-squares Method
    Kovacevic, Aleksandar
    Kovacevic, Dragan
    Osmokrovic, Predrag
    PROCEEDINGS OF PROGRESS IN ELECTROMAGNETICS RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM (PIERS 2012), 2012, : 1173 - 1179
  • [2] Complex derivatives valuation: applying the Least-Squares Monte Carlo Simulation Method with several polynomial basis
    Monteiro de Lima, Ursula Silveira
    Samanez, Carlos Patricio
    FINANCIAL INNOVATION, 2016, 2 (01)
  • [3] Applying the Multilevel Monte Carlo Method for Heterogeneity-Induced Uncertainty Quantification of Surfactant/Polymer Flooding
    Alkhatib, A.
    Babaei, M.
    SPE JOURNAL, 2016, 21 (04): : 1192 - 1203
  • [5] Bootstrapping the Early Exercise Boundary in the Least-Squares Monte Carlo Method
    Letourneau, Pascal
    Stentoft, Lars
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 12 (04)
  • [6] Least-squares analysis of data with uncertainty in x and y: A Monte Carlo methods comparison
    Tellinghuisen, Joel
    CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2010, 103 (02) : 160 - 169
  • [7] Valuing real capital investments using the least-squares Monte Carlo method
    Abdel Sabour, Sabry A.
    Poulin, Richard
    Engineering Economist, 2006, 51 (02): : 141 - 160
  • [8] Optimizations in financial engineering: The Least-Squares Monte Carlo method of Longstaff and Schwartz
    Choudhury, Anamitra Roy
    King, Alan
    Kumar, Sunil
    Sabharwal, Yogish
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PARALLEL & DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING, VOLS 1-8, 2008, : 1612 - +
  • [9] Testing the Least-Squares Monte Carlo Method for the Evaluation of Capital Requirements in Life Insurance
    Costabile, Massimo
    Viviano, Fabio
    RISKS, 2020, 8 (02)
  • [10] Least Squares Monte Carlo Simulation-Based Decision-Making Method for Photovoltaic Investment in Korea
    An, Jungmin
    Kim, Dong-Kwan
    Lee, Jinyeong
    Joo, Sung-Kwan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (19)