EVALUATING THE SOIL MOISTURE CONTENT THROUGH DIFFERENT INTERPOLATION METHODS

被引:0
|
作者
Yildirim, D. [1 ]
Cemek, B. [2 ]
Unlukara, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Black Sea Agr Res Inst, Irrigat & Land Reclamat Unit, Samsun, Turkey
[2] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Agr Struct & Irrigat, Samsun, Turkey
[3] Erciyes Univ, Seyrani Fac Agr, Dept Biosyst Engn, Kayseri, Turkey
关键词
interpolation methods; Ordinary Kriging; radial basis function; inverse distance weight; soil moisture;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Water is vital for the plant growth. An adequate amount of soil moisture content is required in order to increase plant growth and yield. The spatial distribution can be determined using different methods for different depths of soil moisture content. In this study the spatial distribution is created at four different soil depths (30, 60, 90 and 120 cm) using deterministic and stochastic methods. In order to determine the most appropriate methods, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) values were compared between the methods. The lowest RMSE (11.296) and MAE (7.821) values were obtained for 0-30 cm depth of soil moisture content by Ordinary Kriging method. As for the depth of 30-60 cm, the lowest RMSE (13.682) and MAE (8.444) values were obtained through Inverse Distance Weight (IDW). As for the depth of 60-90 cm, the lowest RMSE (17.767) and MAE (11.473) values were obtained through the Radial Basis Function (RBF). As for the depth of 90-120 cm, the lowest RMSE (20.24) and MAE (14.18) values were obtained through the IDW method. The soil moisture content maps have been prepared for 0-30 cm, 30-60 cm, 60-90 cm and 90-120 cm soil depths based on these methods.
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 725
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison Quality of Interpolation Methods to Estimate Spatial Distribution of Soil Moisture Content
    Tuncay, Tulay
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2021, 52 (04) : 353 - 374
  • [2] Reliability of different methods for rapid measurement of soil moisture content
    Chen W.
    Chen H.
    Bi J.
    Li X.
    Zhongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2020, 51 (08): : 2152 - 2161
  • [3] Interpolation of soil moisture content aided by FDR sensor observations
    Vanderlinden, K.
    Jimenez, J. A.
    Muriel, J. L.
    Perea, F.
    Garcia, I.
    Martinez, G.
    GEOENV VI - GEOSTATISTICS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 15 : 397 - +
  • [4] Interpolation of Irregular Soil Moisture Measurements with Machine Learning Methods
    Cisty, Milan
    Cyprich, Frantisek
    Dezericky, David
    5TH WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING-ARCHITECTURE-URBAN PLANNING SYMPOSIUM (WMCAUS), 2020, 960
  • [5] Geostatistic interpolation of soil moisture
    Kitterod, NO
    Langsholt, E
    Wong, WK
    Gottschalk, L
    NORDIC HYDROLOGY, 1997, 28 (4-5) : 307 - 328
  • [6] Comparison and application of multiple methods for temporal interpolation of daily soil moisture
    Ford, Trenton W.
    Quiring, Steven M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2014, 34 (08) : 2604 - 2621
  • [7] METHODS FOR EVALUATING THE MOISTURE CONTENT OF LARGE POWER TRANSFORMERS.
    Ierusalimov, M.E.
    Sokolov, V.V.
    Filippishin, V.Ya.
    Tutkevich, A.S.
    Beletskii, Z.M.
    1600, (49):
  • [8] Spatial variability of soil organic matter content in Eastern Croatia assessed using different interpolation methods
    Durdevic, Boris
    Jug, Irena
    Jug, Danijel
    Bogunovic, Igor
    Vukadinovic, Vesna
    Stipesevic, Bojan
    Brozovic, Bojana
    INTERNATIONAL AGROPHYSICS, 2019, 33 (01) : 31 - 39
  • [9] Comparison of different methods for the determination of moisture content in biomass
    Samuelsson, Robert
    Burvall, Jan
    Jirjis, Raida
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2006, 30 (11): : 929 - 934
  • [10] Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for soil moisture and its application for monitoring drought
    Hui Chen
    Li Fan
    Wei Wu
    Hong-Bin Liu
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2017, 189