Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer and the predictive role of endoluminal ultrasonography

被引:29
|
作者
Reid, T. D. [1 ]
Chan, D. S. Y. [1 ]
Roberts, S. A. [2 ]
Crosby, T. D. L. [3 ]
Williams, G. T. [4 ]
Lewis, W. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wales Hosp, Dept Surg, SE Wales Canc Network, Cardiff CF14 4XW, S Glam, Wales
[2] Univ Wales Hosp, Dept Radiol, SE Wales Canc Network, Cardiff CF14 4XW, S Glam, Wales
[3] Velindre Hosp, Dept Oncol, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[4] Univ Wales Hosp, Dept Pathol, SE Wales Canc Network, Cardiff CF14 4XW, S Glam, Wales
关键词
oesophageal cancer; oesophagectomy; circumferential resection margin; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; RESECTABLE ESOPHAGEAL; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CHEMOTHERAPY; SURGERY; ADENOCARCINOMA; SURVIVAL; CHEMORADIATION; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2012.511
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The optimum multimodal treatment for oesophageal cancer, and the prognostic significance of histopathological tumour involvement of the circumferential resection margin (CRM+) are uncertain. The aims of this study were to determine the prognostic significance of CRM+ after oesophagectomy and to identify endosonographic (endoluminal ultrasonography (EUS)) features that predict a threatened CRM+. METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-nine consecutive patients underwent potentially curative oesophagectomy (103 surgery alone, 124 neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CS) and 42 chemoradiotherapy (CRTS)). Primary outcome measures were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: CRM+ was reported in 98 (38.0%) of all, and in 90 (62.5%) of pT3 patients. Multivariate analysis of pathological factors revealed: lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.087, 95% CI 1.396-3.122, P<0.0001), CRM+ (HR 1.762, 95% CI 1.201-2.586, P=0.004) and lymph node metastasis count (HR 1.563, 95% CI 1.018-2.400, P=0.041) to be independently and significantly associated with DFS. Lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.160, 95% CI 1.432-3.259, P<0.001) and CRM+ (HR 1.514, 95% CI 1.000-2.292, P=0.050) were also independently and significantly associated with OS. Multivariate analysis revealed EUS T stage (T3 or T4, OR 24.313, 95% CI 7.438-79.476, P<0.0001) and use or not of CRTS (OR 0.116, 95% CI 0.035-0.382, P<0.0001) were independently and significantly associated with CRM+. CONCLUSION: A positive CRM was a better predictor of DFS and OS than standard pTNM stage. British Journal of Cancer (2012) 107, 1925-1931. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.511 www.bjcancer.com Published online 20 November 2012 (C) 2012 Cancer Research UK
引用
收藏
页码:1925 / 1931
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer and the predictive role of endoluminal ultrasonography
    T D Reid
    D S Y Chan
    S A Roberts
    T D L Crosby
    G T Williams
    W G Lewis
    British Journal of Cancer, 2012, 107 : 1925 - 1931
  • [2] Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer
    Khan, OA
    Fitzgerald, JJ
    Soomro, I
    Beggs, FD
    Morgan, WE
    Duffy, JP
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 88 (10) : 1549 - 1552
  • [3] Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer
    O A Khan
    J J Fitzgerald
    I Soomro
    F D Beggs
    W E Morgan
    J P Duffy
    British Journal of Cancer, 2003, 88 : 1549 - 1552
  • [4] The prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement in colon cancer
    Sokmen, Selman
    Ozbilgin, Mucahit
    Canda, Aras Emre
    Sarioglu, Sulen
    Sagol, Ozgul
    Fuzun, Mehmet
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 134 (04) : A863 - A864
  • [5] The prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer
    Wibe, A
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 120 (05) : A473 - A473
  • [6] The significance of circumferential margin involvement following resection of oesophageal carcinoma
    Mapstone, N
    Quirke, P
    Dexter, S
    Sue-Ling, H
    Martin, I
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1999, 187 : 3A - 3A
  • [7] Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer
    Baik, SH
    Kim, NK
    Lee, KY
    Sohn, SK
    Cho, CH
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (03) : 660 - 660
  • [8] Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
    Wibe, A
    Rendedal, PR
    Svensson, E
    Norstein, J
    Eide, TJ
    Myrvold, HE
    Soreide, O
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 (03) : 327 - 334
  • [9] SIGNIFICANCE OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION MARGIN INVOLVEMENT AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR CANCER
    SAGAR, PM
    JOHNSTON, D
    MCMAHON, MJ
    DIXON, MF
    QUIRKE, P
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 80 (11) : 1386 - 1388
  • [10] SIGNIFICANCE OF MICROSCOPICALLY INCOMPLETE RESECTION MARGIN FOLLOWING OESOPHAGECTOMY FOR OESOPHAGEAL CANCER
    Markar, S. R.
    Mariette, C.
    GUT, 2015, 64 : A476 - A477