Reliability of pelvimetry is affected by observer experience but not by breed and sex: A cross-sectional study in beef cattle

被引:4
|
作者
Vernooij, Johannes [1 ]
de Munck, Florine [1 ]
van Nieuwenhuizen, Evelien [1 ]
Webb, Edward [2 ]
Jonker, Herman [1 ]
Vos, Peter [1 ]
Holm, Dietmar [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Fac Vet Med, Sect Farm Anim Hlth, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Yalelaan 7, NL-3584 CL Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Pretoria, Fac Nat & Agr Sci, Dept Anim & Wildlife Sci, Pretoria, South Africa
[3] Univ Pretoria, Fac Vet Sci, Dept Prod Anim Studies, Onderstepoort, South Africa
关键词
cattle; experience; observer variability; pelvimetry; probit model; RICE PELVIMETER; PELVIC AREA; DYSTOCIA;
D O I
10.1111/rda.13814
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Pelvis size plays an important role to prevent dystocia in cattle caused by the foeto-maternal disproportion in commonly primiparous females. The reproducibility and repeatability are two important aspects for the reliability of the measurements to use in the selection of cattle for culling. Pelvic measures were taken with a Rice pelvimeter from 224 young cattle (180 females and 44 males) of four beef breeds in South Africa. One experienced and two inexperienced observers each measured pelvic height and width twice. The proportion measurements with a maximum difference of 0.5 cm within animal compared with the first measurement by the experienced observer are around 80% and by the inexperienced observers around 50% for pelvic height and around 60% for pelvic width. Breed and sex do not affect the reliability of pelvimetry by an experienced observer. Under- and overestimation of pelvis size were observed in inexperienced observers, which seems to be unrelated to breed and sex.
引用
收藏
页码:1592 / 1598
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cross-sectional prevalence of Fasciola gigantica infections in beef cattle in Botswana
    Mochankana, M. Ernest
    Robertson, Ian D.
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2018, 50 (06) : 1355 - 1363
  • [2] Cross-sectional prevalence of Fasciola gigantica infections in beef cattle in Botswana
    M. Ernest Mochankana
    Ian D. Robertson
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2018, 50 : 1355 - 1363
  • [3] Intra- and inter-rater reliability in a comparative study of cross-sectional and spiral computed tomography pelvimetry methods
    Phexell, Erika
    Akesson, Anna
    Soderberg, Marcus
    Bolejko, Anetta
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA OPEN, 2019, 8 (06):
  • [4] Inter-observer reliability of preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise test interpretation: a cross-sectional study
    Abbott, T. E. F.
    Gooneratne, M.
    McNeill, J.
    Lee, A.
    Levett, D. Z. H.
    Grocott, M. P. W.
    Swart, M.
    MacDonald, N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 120 (03) : 475 - 483
  • [5] Serological cross-sectional study of paratuberculosis in cattle in Austria
    Gasteiner, J
    Wenzl, H
    Fuchs, K
    Jark, U
    Baumgartner, W
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE SERIES B-INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND VETERINARY PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 46 (07): : 457 - 466
  • [7] Lameness in Beef Cattle: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Survey of On-Farm Practices and Approaches
    Tunstall, Jay
    Mueller, Karin
    Grove-White, Dai
    Oultram, Joanne W. H.
    Higgins, Helen Mary
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2021, 8
  • [8] Sex inequalities in cardiovascular health: a cross-sectional study
    Jankovic, Janko
    Marinkovic, Jelena
    Stojisavljevic, Dragana
    Eric, Milos
    Vasiljevic, Nadja
    Jankovic, Slavenka
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 26 (01): : 152 - 158
  • [9] Casual Sex and Sexlessness in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Konishi, Shoko
    Moriki, Yoshie
    Kariya, Fumiko
    Akagawa, Manabu
    SEXES, 2022, 3 (02): : 254 - 266
  • [10] A Maltese Perspective of Sex: a Maltese cross-sectional study
    Bartolo, Matthew
    Marmara, Vincent
    Cassar, Danica
    Miclet, Arianna
    SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2025, 13 (01)