Haematologic Parameters in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Capecitabine Combination Therapy

被引:13
|
作者
Inanc, Mevlude [1 ]
Duran, Ayse Ocak [2 ]
Karaca, Halit [2 ]
Berk, Veli [2 ]
Bozkurt, Oktay [2 ]
Ozaslan, Ersin [2 ]
Ozkan, Metin [2 ]
机构
[1] Kayseri Training & Res Hosp, Kayseri, Turkey
[2] Erciyes Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Kayseri, Turkey
关键词
Colorectal cancer; chemotherapy response; MCV; PLT; NLR; MEAN CORPUSCULAR VOLUME; NEUTROPHIL-LYMPHOCYTE RATIO; PROGNOSTIC-FACTOR; PRETREATMENT NEUTROPHIL; PREOPERATIVE NEUTROPHIL; BEVACIZUMAB; PROTEINS; SURVIVAL; ANGIOGENESIS; INFLAMMATION;
D O I
10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.1.253
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The standard treatment in the metastatic colorectal cancer consists of 5-FU based infusional regimens. However, with oral fluoropyrimidines, equal tumor responses may be obtained. Capecitabine causes macrocytosis of the cells by inhibition of DNA synthesis. In this context, a relationship was found between mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and response to therapy in breast cancer patients treated with Capecitabine, but whether this relationship also pertains in colorectal cancer has not been established. Materials and Methods: A total of 102 metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with a oxaliplatin (XELOX)+/- Bevacizumab combination were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were randomized into three groups. Hematological parameters (MCV, MPV, PCT, PLT, NLR) were recorded retrospectively, before treatment and after 3 cycles of chemotherapy. Results: After three cycles of therapy, 20 (19.6%) patients had progressive disease (PD), 41 (40.1%) had stable disease (SD), and 41 (40.1%) demonstrated a partial response (PR). In 62 (60.7%) treatment was with capesitabin plus XELOX therapy, and in 40 (39.2%) it was XELOX-Bevacizumab combination therapy. There was no difference among three groups before the treatment in terms of MCV, MPV, PCT, PLT, and NLR. MCV showed significant increase in chemotherapy response groups (PR and SD). In addition, a significant decrease was observed for platelet count in chemotherapy response groups. While NLR decrease was seen in only a PR group, PCT decrease was observed in all three groups. PCT and PLT values were higher in patients receiving Bevacizumab. Conclusions: PLT, PCT, MPV, and NLR values were decreased due to Capecitabine-based chemotherapy, however MCV was increased. PCT and PLT values were higher in patients who received Bevacizumab than those who did not. MCV, PLT, and NLR can be considered as important factors in predicting response to colorectal carcinoma treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 256
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The combination of capecitabine and thalidomide in previously treated, refractory metastatic colorectal cancer
    McCollum, AD
    Wu, BY
    Clark, JW
    Kulke, MH
    Enzinger, PC
    Ryan, DP
    Earle, CC
    Michelini, A
    Fuchs, CS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2006, 29 (01): : 40 - 44
  • [2] Evaluation of quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with capecitabine
    Segalla, Jose G. M.
    Van Eyll, Brigitte
    Honda Federico, Mirian Hatsue
    Skare, Nills G.
    Franke, Fabio A.
    Perdicaris, Martha R.
    de Paula Filho, Urias
    Gampel, Otavio
    Cabral, Sebastiao
    Ribeiro, Ronaldo de Albuquerque
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2008, 7 (02) : 126 - 133
  • [3] The Role of Intestinal Microbiota in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Capecitabine
    Aarnoutse, Romy
    Ziemons, Janine
    de Vos-Geelen, Judith
    Valkenburg-van Iersel, Liselot
    Wildeboer, Aurelia C. L.
    Vievermans, Anne
    Creemers, Geert-Jan M.
    Baars, Arnold
    Vestjens, Hanneke J. H. M. J.
    Le, Giang N.
    Barnett, David J. M.
    Rensen, Sander S.
    Penders, John
    Smidt, Marjolein L.
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2022, 21 (02) : E87 - E97
  • [4] Capecitabine in combination with panitumumab is not the treatment of choice in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
    Liposits, Gabor
    Pfeiffer, Per
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 13 (01) : 114 - 115
  • [5] Dosage of capecitabine and cyclophosphamide combination therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer
    Ohno, Shinji
    Mitsuyama, Shoshu
    Tamura, Kazuo
    Nishimura, Reiki
    Tanaka, Maki
    Hamada, Yuzo
    Kuroki, Shoji
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 27 (02) : 1009 - 1013
  • [6] Patients With Locally Advanced and Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Capecitabine Versus 5-Fluorouracil as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy With Oxaliplatin: A Cost Comparison
    Chu, Edward
    Schulman, Kathy L.
    McKenna, Edward F., Jr.
    Cartwright, Thomas
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2010, 9 (04) : 229 - 237
  • [7] Capecitabine maintenance therapy after docetaxel/capecitabine combination chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer
    Gursoy, Pinar
    Surmeli, Zeki Gokhan
    Cakar, Burcu
    Arslan, Cagatay
    Zengel, Baha
    Karaca, Burcak
    Sezgin, Canfeza
    Karabulut, Bulent
    Sanli, Ulus Ali
    Uslu, Ruchan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [8] Efficacy of capecitabine-based combination therapy and singleagent capecitabine maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer
    Huimin Lv
    Min Yan
    Mengwei Zhang
    Limin Niu
    Huiai Zeng
    Shude Cui
    ChineseJournalofCancerResearch, 2014, 26 (06) : 692 - 697
  • [9] Safety of capecitabine plus bevacizumab in heavily treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC)
    Adamo, Vincenzo
    Festa, Vincenzo
    Restuccia, Eleonora
    Chiofalo, Giuseppe
    Maisano, Carmelo
    Picciotto, Maria
    Alafaci, Elisabetta
    Tortora, Giampaolo
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2007, 18 : 16 - 17
  • [10] Capecitabine maintenance therapy following docetaxel/capecitabine combination treatment. in patients with metastatic breast cancer
    Surmeli, Zeki Gokhan
    Varol, Umut
    Cakar, Burcu
    Degirmenci, Mustafa
    Arslan, Cagatay
    Piskin, Gonul Demir
    Zengel, Baha
    Karaca, Burcak
    Sanli, Ulus Ali
    Uslu, Ruchan
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2015, 10 (04) : 2598 - 2602