Gender Impact on Electrophysiological Activity of the Brain

被引:25
|
作者
Langrova, J. [1 ]
Kremlacek, J. [1 ]
Kuba, M. [1 ]
Kubova, Z. [1 ]
Szanyi, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med Hradec Kralove, Dept Pathophysiol, Simkova 870, Hradec Kralove 50038, Czech Republic
关键词
Gender; Pattern-reversal VEPs; Motion VEPs; Event related potentials; Visual mismatch negativity; MOTION-ONSET VEPS; REVERSAL EVOKED-POTENTIALS; PATTERN-REVERSAL; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; AGE; EEG; SEX; P300; MATURATION; LATENCY;
D O I
10.33549/physiolres.932421
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
Gender is presumed to be one of the factors causing interindividual variability in the brain's electrophysiological parameters. Our aim was to characterize the role of gender in visual evoked potentials (VEPs), event-related potentials (ERPs), visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) and the spectral characteristics of the EEG. We examined 42 healthy volunteers (21 women and 21 men, aged 20-29 years). We measured VEPs in response to pattern-reversal and motion-onset stimulation, ERPs in an oddball paradigm and vMMN in response to a combination of motion directions presented in the visual periphery. P100 peak latency for 40' reversal VEPs was significantly shorter in women than in men as determined using a non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test. In addition, women showed higher relative EEG spectral power in the alpha band (p=0.023) and lower power in the theta band (p=0.004). Our results in this small but homogeneous group of subjects confirm previously reported gender influences on pattern-reversal VEPs and the EEG frequency spectrum. Gender should be taken into consideration in establishing norms on these measures. We found no statistically significant differences between women and men for any of the other stimuli presented.
引用
收藏
页码:S119 / S127
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Electrophysiological neuroimaging of brain activity
    He, B
    Lian, J
    SECOND JOINT EMBS-BMES CONFERENCE 2002, VOLS 1-3, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS: BIOENGINEERING - INTEGRATIVE METHODOLOGIES, NEW TECHNOLOGIES, 2002, : 1970 - 1971
  • [2] Electrophysiological indices of brain activity to "the" in discourse
    Shafer, VL
    Kessler, KL
    Schwartz, RG
    Morr, ML
    Kurtzberg, D
    BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2005, 93 (03) : 277 - 297
  • [3] Electrophysiological brain activity and memory source monitoring
    Johnson, MK
    Kounios, J
    Nolde, SF
    NEUROREPORT, 1996, 7 (18) : 2929 - 2932
  • [4] Electrophysiological brain activity and memory source monitoring
    Johnson, MK
    Kounios, J
    Nolde, SF
    NEUROREPORT, 1997, 8 (05) : 1317 - 1320
  • [5] Electrophysiological impact of mental fatigue on brain activity during a bike task: A wavelet analysis approach
    Proost, Matthias
    De Bock, Sander
    Habay, Jelle
    Nagels, Guy
    De Pauw, Kevin
    Meeusen, Romain
    Roelands, Bart
    Van Cutsem, Jeroen
    PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2024, 282
  • [6] Brain electrophysiological activity correlates with temporal processing in rats
    Hattori, Minoru
    Sakata, Shogo
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2014, 101 : 97 - 102
  • [7] Electrophysiological correlates of the emotional response on brain activity in adolescents
    Mesa-Gresa, Patricia
    Gil-Gomez, Jose-Antonio
    Lozano-Quilis, Jose Antonio
    Schoeps, Konstanze
    Montoya-Castilla, Inmaculada
    BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2024, 89
  • [8] The impact of aging and gender on brain viscoelasticity
    Sack, Ingolf
    Beierbach, Bernd
    Wuerfel, Jens
    Klatt, Dieter
    Hamhaber, Uwe
    Papazoglou, Sebastian
    Martus, Peter
    Braun, Juergen
    NEUROIMAGE, 2009, 46 (03) : 652 - 657
  • [9] Electrophysiological impact of trazodone on the dopamine and norepinephrine systems in the rat brain
    Ghanbari, Ramez
    El Mansari, Mostafa
    Blier, Pierre
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 22 (07) : 518 - 526
  • [10] Electrophysiological indices of brain activity to content and function words in discourse
    Neumann, Yael
    Epstein, Baila
    Shafer, Valerie L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2016, 51 (05) : 546 - 555