Detection of portal perfusion abnormalities - Comparison of 3 ferucarbotran-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging sequences

被引:0
|
作者
Iwazawa, J [1 ]
Nishida, N [1 ]
Yamamoto, A [1 ]
Nango, M [1 ]
Ninoi, T [1 ]
Murakami, Y [1 ]
Nakamura, K [1 ]
Inoue, Y [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka City Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Abeno Ku, Osaka 5458585, Japan
关键词
liver; superparamagnetic iron oxides; magnetic resonance imaging; portal perfusion abnormalities;
D O I
10.1097/00004728-200603000-00001
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To estimate the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 3 ferucarbotran-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences prospectively for the detection of nontumoral portal perfusion abnormalities. Methods: Thirty-nine noncirrhotic patients with liver metastases underwent computed tomography during arterial portography (CTAP) and MR imaging comprising T1-weighted gradient recalled echo (GRE), T2-weighted fast spin echo (FSE), and T2*-weighted GRE sequences with and without ferucarbotran. Magnetic resonance images were reviewed by 4 blinded observers for rating based on the confidence scale. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for each sequence were measured by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and relative signal-to-noise ratio changes were statistically compared. Results: Thirty-nine nontumoral perfusion defects were observed in 22 patients by CTAP. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed the accuracy was higher for T2*-weighted GRE (0.884) than for T1-weighted GRE (0.572) and T2-weighted FSE (0.597). T2*-weighted imaging achieved the highest sensitivity (81.4%) and the lowest specificity (86.6%). Postenhanced T2*-weighted imaging achieved the highest CNR (19.3 +/- 9.2). Conclusions: T2*-weighted imaging was the most accurate and sensitive method for detecting portal perfusion abnormalities compared with T1- or T2-weighted imaging, whereas T1- or T2-weighted imaging is superior in specificity to T2*-weighted imaging during ferucarbotran-enhanced MR imaging.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 172
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Detection of hepatic VX2 carcinomas with ferucarbotran-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in rabbits: Comparison of nine pulse sequences
    Kim, Seong Hyun
    Choi, Dongil
    Lim, Hyo K.
    Kim, Min Ju
    Jang, Kyung Mi
    Kim, Seung Hoon
    Lee, Won Jae
    Lee, Jongmee
    Jeon, Yong Hwan
    Lim, Jae Hoon
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (03) : 413 - 423
  • [2] Ferucarbotran-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Initial Experiencele
    Lee, Ji Young
    Kim, Seong Hyun
    Jeon, Yong Hwan
    Lee, Jongmee
    Kim, Min Ju
    Choi, Dongil
    Lee, Won Jae
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2010, 34 (01) : 127 - 134
  • [3] Focal nodular hyperplasia: Intraindividual comparison of dynamic gadobenate dimeglumine- and ferucarbotran-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Marin, Daniele
    Iannaccone, Riccardo
    Laghi, Andrea
    Catalano, Carlo
    Murakami, Takamichi
    Hori, Masatoshi
    Kim, Tonsok
    Passariello, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2007, 25 (04) : 775 - 782
  • [4] Detection of focal fiver lesions in unenhanced and ferucarbotran-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison of T2-weighted breath-hold and respiratory-triggered sequences
    Rief, Matthias
    Wagner, Moritz
    Franiel, Tobias
    Bresan, Viola
    Taupitz, Matthias
    Klessen, Christian
    Hamm, Bernd
    Asbach, Patrick
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 27 (09) : 1223 - 1229
  • [5] Comparison of Enhancement Patterns of Histologically Confirmed Hepatocellular Carcinoma Between Gadoxetate- and Ferucarbotran-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Okada, Masahiro
    Imai, Yasuharu
    Kim, Tonsok
    Kogita, Sachiyo
    Takamura, Manabu
    Kumano, Seishi
    Onishi, Hiromitsu
    Hori, Masatoshi
    Fukuda, Kazuto
    Hayashi, Norio
    Wakasa, Kenichi
    Sakamoto, Michiie
    Murakami, Takamichi
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 32 (04) : 903 - 913
  • [6] Detection of hepatic metastasis: Manganese- and ferucarbotran-enhanced MR imaging
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    Kim, Joo Hee
    Kim, Seung Hyoung
    Ko, Heung-Kyu
    Lim, Joon Seok
    Oh, Young Taik
    Chung, Jae-Joon
    Yoo, Hyung Sik
    Lee, Jong Tae
    Kim, Ki Whang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 60 (01) : 84 - 90
  • [7] Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma by ferucarbotran-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: the efficacy of accumulation phase fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging
    Chou, C. -T.
    Chen, R. -C.
    Chen, W. -T.
    Lii, J. -M.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2009, 64 (01) : 22 - 29
  • [8] Clinical Management of Hepatic Malignancies: Ferucarbotran-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Contrast-Enhanced Spiral Computed Tomography
    Riccardo Lencioni
    Clotilde Della Pina
    Jordi Bruix
    Pietro Majno
    Luigi Grazioli
    Giovanni Morana
    Antonella Filippone
    Andrea Laghi
    Carlo Bartolozzi
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2005, 50 : 533 - 537
  • [9] Clinical management of hepatic malignancies: Ferucarbotran-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging versus contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography
    Lencioni, R
    Della Pina, C
    Bruix, J
    Majno, P
    Grazioli, L
    Morana, G
    Filippone, A
    Laghi, A
    Bartolozzi, C
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2005, 50 (03) : 533 - 537
  • [10] Comparison of gadolinium-BOPTA and ferucarbotran-enhanced three-dimensional T1-weighted dynamic liver magnetic resonance imaging in the same patient
    Wersebe, A
    Wiskirchen, J
    Decker, U
    Schick, F
    Dietz, K
    Müller-Schimpfle, M
    Claussen, CD
    Pereira, PL
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (03) : 264 - 271