Job preferences of agricultural students in Germany - A choice-based conjoint analysis for both genders

被引:0
|
作者
Meyerding, Stephan G. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Agr Econ & Rural Dev, Mkt Food & Agr Prod, Pl Gottinger Sieben 5, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
war-for-talents; social desirability; work-home-conflict; gender; job choice; FACULTY; CAREER; MARKET;
D O I
10.22434/IFAMR2017.0060
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Knowledge of the job preferences of agricultural students is essential for the competitiveness of the industry. Yet no study is available in Germany. Other studies mostly used direct questions for the preference measurement, which raises possible concerns about a socially desirable response bias. For this reason, the present study combines a quasi-experiment (choice-based conjoint analysis) and direct questions (Likert scales) to measure the job preferences of 568 agricultural students in Germany and compares the results. In addition to finding gender differences, the study found that 'income' and 'future perspective' are the most important job characteristics for the job choice of agricultural students, and that they also prefer an increasing 'work-life-balance' as well as a 'rural location' for their future employer. Insights about job characteristics' attractiveness lead to a more transparent environment in which employers and (potential) employees make better-informed decisions, resulting in increased job satisfaction, performance and career sustainability.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 235
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis of Marketing Master Student's Job Preferences
    Kun, Zsuzsanna
    Simon, Judit
    Pusztai, Tamas
    11TH EMAC REGIONAL CONFERENCE - CHALLENGING THE STATUS QUO IN MARKETING RESEARCH, 2020, : 141 - 149
  • [2] Patient preferences for outcomes of depression treatment in Germany: A choice-based conjoint analysis study
    Zimmermann, Thomas M.
    Clouth, Johannes
    Elosge, Michael
    Heurich, Matthias
    Schneider, Edith
    Wilhelm, Stefan
    Wolfrath, Anette
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2013, 148 (2-3) : 210 - 219
  • [3] The effect of information on preferences stated in a choice-based conjoint analysis
    van Til, J. A.
    Stiggelbout, A. M.
    IJzerman, M. J.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2009, 74 (02) : 264 - 271
  • [4] Likelihood estimation of consumer preferences in choice-based conjoint analysis
    Halme, Merja
    Kallio, Markku
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 239 (02) : 556 - 564
  • [5] Estimation methods for choice-based conjoint analysis of consumer preferences
    Halme, Merja
    Kallio, Markku
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, 214 (01) : 160 - 167
  • [6] Modeling the anti-cyberbullying preferences of university students: Adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis
    Cunningham, Charles E.
    Chen, Yvonne
    Vaillancourt, Tracy
    Rimas, Heather
    Deal, Ken
    Cunningham, Lesley J.
    Ratcliffe, Jenna
    AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR, 2015, 41 (04) : 369 - 385
  • [7] Understanding preferences for EEE collection services: A choice-based conjoint analysis
    Mansuy, Jean
    Verlinde, Sara
    Macharis, Cathy
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2020, 161 (161)
  • [8] Evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis
    Li, Yi
    Spradling, Kyle
    Allen, Isabel Elaine
    Conti, Simon
    Hampson, Lindsay A.
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [9] Entrepreneurial branding: measuring consumer preferences through choice-based conjoint analysis
    Eggers, Fabian
    Eggers, Felix
    Kraus, Sascha
    INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 12 (02) : 427 - 444
  • [10] Eliciting Patient Preferences for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis
    Fazeli, Soudabeh
    Covarrubias, Yesenia
    Bassirian, Shirin
    Cuevas, Jordan
    Fowler, Kathryn
    Vodkin, Irine
    Kono, Yuko
    Marks, Robert
    Loomba, Rohit
    Taouli, Bachir
    Sirlin, Claude
    Carlos, Ruth
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 19 (04) : 502 - 512