The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience

被引:165
|
作者
Cleland, Kelly [1 ]
Zhu, Haoping [2 ]
Goldstuck, Norman [3 ]
Cheng, Linan [4 ]
Trussell, James [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Off Populat Res, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Minhang Cent Hosp, Shanghai 201100, Peoples R China
[3] Reprod Res S Africa, ZA-8005 Cape Town, South Africa
[4] Shanghai Inst Planned Parenthood Res, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Hull, Hull York Med Sch, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
关键词
emergency contraception; intrauterine device; unintended pregnancy; unprotected intercourse; contraception; POST-COITAL CONTRACEPTION; ULIPRISTAL ACETATE; POSTCOITAL IUD; PREGNANCY; WOMEN; LEVONORGESTREL; COMBINATION; MULTICENTER; INSERTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/des140
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Intrauterine devices (IUDs) have been studied for use for emergency contraception for at least 35 years. IUDs are safe and highly effective for emergency contraception and regular contraception, and are extremely cost-effective as an ongoing method. The objective of this study was to evaluate the existing data to estimate the efficacy of IUDs for emergency contraception. The reference list for this study was generated from hand searching the reference lists of relevant articles and our own article archives, and electronic searches of several databases: Medline, Global Health, Clinicaltrials.gov, Popline, Wanfang Data (Chinese) and Weipu Data (Chinese). We included studies published in English or Chinese, with a defined population of women who presented for emergency contraception and were provided with an IUD, and in which the number of pregnancies was ascertained and loss to follow-up was clearly defined. Data from each article were abstracted independently by two reviewers. The 42 studies (of 274 retrieved) that met our inclusion criteria were conducted in six countries between 1979 and 2011 and included eight different types of IUD and 7034 women. The maximum timeframe from intercourse to insertion of the IUD ranged from 2 days to 10 or more days; the majority of insertions (74 of studies) occurred within 5 days of intercourse. The pregnancy rate (excluding one outlier study) was 0.09. IUDs are a highly effective method of contraception after unprotected intercourse. Because they are safe for the majority of women, highly effective and cost-effective when left in place as ongoing contraception, whenever clinically feasible IUDs should be included in the range of emergency contraception options offered to patients presenting after unprotected intercourse. This review is limited by the fact that the original studies did not provide sufficient data on the delay between intercourse and insertion of the IUD, parity, cycle day of intercourse or IUD type to allow analysis by any of these variables.
引用
收藏
页码:1994 / 2000
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception and beyond: a systematic review update
    Goldstuck, Norman D.
    Cheung, Tik Shan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2019, 11 : 471 - 479
  • [2] ESTIMATING EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION EFFICACY WITH LEVONORGESTREL AND COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICES
    Nourse, S. E.
    Woodcock, A. L.
    Brown, K. S.
    Turok, D. K.
    Gero, A.
    Gawron, L. M.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2024, 139
  • [3] Progestin intrauterine devices versus copper intrauterine devices for emergency contraception
    Ramanadhan, Shaalini
    Goldstuck, Norman
    Henderson, Jillian T.
    Che, Yan
    Cleland, Kelly
    Dodge, Laura E.
    Edelman, Alison
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, (02):
  • [4] 6 YEARS OF CONTRACEPTION WITH INTRAUTERINE DEVICES
    OBOLENSK.W
    POLASEK, F
    BERNARD, RP
    ARCHIV FUR GYNAKOLOGIE, 1973, 214 (1-4): : 481 - 482
  • [5] Comparison of levonorgestrel in different forms and copper intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gaio, Giovana de Souza
    Kemczenski, Frederico
    Erzinger, Gabriel
    de Oliveira, Helen Michaela
    Farias, Caroline Freitas
    Chagas, Junea
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2025, 305 : 153 - 158
  • [6] Intrauterine devices should be offered to women wanting emergency contraception
    Mayor, Susan
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 344
  • [7] Levonorgestrel vs. Copper Intrauterine Devices for Emergency Contraception
    Turok, David K.
    Gero, Alexandra
    Simmons, Rebecca G.
    Kaiser, Jennifer E.
    Stoddard, Gregory J.
    Sexsmith, Corinne D.
    Gawron, Lori M.
    Sanders, Jessica N.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 384 (04): : 335 - 344
  • [8] RAPID REVIEW OF 4 YEARS OF INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTION
    CLERC, JP
    GYNAECOLOGIA, 1969, 168 (06): : 500 - &
  • [9] Emergency contraception Systematic review of the literature
    Lotti, Loczi
    Marton, Vezer
    Marianna, Torok
    Richard, Cseh
    Attila, Keszthelyi
    Nandor, Acs
    Szabolcs, Varbiro
    Marton, Keszthelyi
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2023, 164 (44) : 1736 - 1748
  • [10] Safety of hormonal contraception and intrauterine devices among women with depressive and bipolar disorders: a systematic review
    Pagano, H. Pamela
    Zapata, Lauren B.
    Berry-Bibee, Erin N.
    Nanda, Kavita
    Curtis, Kathryn M.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 94 (06) : 641 - 649