Diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2017 in predicting malignant liver lesions in pediatric patients: a preliminary study

被引:16
|
作者
Ludwig, Daniel R. [1 ]
Romberg, Erin K. [2 ]
Fraum, Tyler J. [1 ]
Rohe, Eric [3 ]
Fowler, Kathryn J. [4 ]
Khanna, Geetika [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, 510 S Kingshighway,Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
Children; Computed tomography; Diagnostic accuracy; Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); Inter-rater reliability; Liver; Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS); Magnetic resonance imaging; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; HEPATIC MALIGNANCIES; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1007/s00247-019-04358-9
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
BackgroundLiver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) has standardized the evaluation of hepatic lesions in adults at risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). There is no accepted imaging algorithm for diagnosing HCC in the pediatric population.ObjectiveThe aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater reliability of LI-RADS version 2017 (v2017) for diagnosing HCC in a pediatric cohort.Materials and methodsThis retrospective, Institutional Review Board-approved study involved review of all abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging at a tertiary children's hospital during a 10-year period, yielding 151 liver lesions in patients <18years. Cases with active extrahepatic malignancy or an inadequate reference standard were excluded. Two readers independently evaluated all included hepatic lesions using LI-RADS criteria. Pathology and imaging follow-up were used as reference standards.ResultsA total of 41 lesions in 41 patients met criteria for evaluation (3 HCCs, 8 non-HCC malignancies, 30 benign lesions). A LI-RADS designation of definite HCC had high sensitivity (Reader 1/Reader 2: 100%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 31-100%) and high specificity (Reader 1: 84%, 95% CI: 68-93%; Reader 2: 97%, 95% CI: 85-100%) for predicting HCC. However, positive predictive value was only 33% (95% CI: 9-69%) and 75% (95% CI: 22-99%) for Reader 1 and Reader 2, respectively. For predicting any type of hepatic malignancy, a LI-RADS designation of definitely or likely malignant (i.e. not necessarily HCC) had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 74-100%) and 90% (95% CI: 61-100%) for Reader 1 and Reader 2, respectively, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% (95% CI: 81-100%) and 96% (95% CI: 83-99%) for Reader 1 and Reader 2, respectively. Interobserver agreement was substantial for the overall LI-RADS category (weighted =0.62; 95% CI: 0.38-0.86).ConclusionThe positive predictive value of LI-RADS v2017 for diagnosing HCC was limited by the low frequency of HCC among pediatric patients. However, a LI-RADS designation of definitely or likely malignant had high sensitivity and NPV for any type of hepatic malignancy and may serve to direct clinical management by selecting patients for tissue sampling.
引用
收藏
页码:746 / 758
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2017 in predicting malignant liver lesions in pediatric patients: a preliminary study
    Daniel R. Ludwig
    Erin K. Romberg
    Tyler J. Fraum
    Eric Rohe
    Kathryn J. Fowler
    Geetika Khanna
    Pediatric Radiology, 2019, 49 : 746 - 758
  • [2] LI-RADS v2017 for liver nodules: how we read and report
    Wolfgang Schima
    Jay Heiken
    Cancer Imaging, 18
  • [3] LI-RADS v2017 for liver nodules: how we read and report
    Schima, Wolfgang
    Heiken, Jay
    CANCER IMAGING, 2018, 18
  • [4] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018: Review of the CT/MRI Diagnostic Categories
    Kanmaniraja, Devaraju
    Dellacerra, Gary
    Holder, Justin
    Erlichman, David
    Chernyak, Victoria
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2021, 72 (01): : 142 - 149
  • [5] Validation of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2014
    Pecorelli, A.
    Nani, R.
    Sala, F.
    Pinelli, D.
    De Giorgio, M.
    Magini, G.
    Colledan, M.
    Fagiuoli, S.
    Sironi, S.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2017, 49 (01) : E49 - E49
  • [6] Validation of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System 2017 (LI-RADS) Criteria for Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Kierans, Andrea S.
    Makkar, Jasnit
    Guniganti, Preethi
    Cornman-Homonoff, Joshua
    Lee, Michael J.
    Pittman, Meredith
    Askin, Gulce
    Hecht, Elizabeth M.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 49 (07) : E205 - E215
  • [7] Pitfalls and problems to be solved in the diagnostic CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS)
    Kim, Yeun-Yoon
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    An, Chansik
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (03) : 1124 - 1132
  • [8] Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2014: understanding and application of the diagnostic algorithm
    An, Chansik
    Rakhmonova, Gulbahor
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 22 (02) : 296 - 307
  • [9] Pitfalls and problems to be solved in the diagnostic CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS)
    Yeun-Yoon Kim
    Jin-Young Choi
    Claude B. Sirlin
    Chansik An
    Myeong-Jin Kim
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 1124 - 1132
  • [10] LIVER IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM (LI-RADS) IN PATIENTS AT HIGH RISK FOR HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA
    McCullar, B. P.
    Appelbaum, A.
    Phillips, J. K.
    Weir, A.
    Waters, B.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 66 (02) : 416 - 416