Markets as monitors: A proposal to replace class actions with exchanges as securities fraud enforcers

被引：62

作者：

Pritchard, AC ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Law, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA

来源：

VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW | 1999年 / 85卷 / 06期

关键词：

D O I：

10.2307/1073966

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

页码：925 / 1020

页数：96

共 11 条

[1] THRESHOLD PREREQUISITES TO SECURITIES FRAUD CLASS ACTIONS
LEADER, JL
TEXAS LAW REVIEW, 1970, 48 (02) : 417 - 459
[2] JURY CERTIFICATION OF FEDERAL SECURITIES FRAUD CLASS ACTIONS
Kayes, Thomas
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2013, 107 (04) : 1851 - 1880
[3] SECONDARY TRADING CRYPTO FRAUD AND THE PROPRIETY OF SECURITIES CLASS ACTIONS
Patel, Menesh S.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 2023, 96 (06) : 1571 - 1628
[4] CONGRESS, THE SUPREME COURT, AND THE RISE OF SECURITIES-FRAUD CLASS ACTIONS
不详
HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 2019, 132 (03) : 1067 - 1088
[5] Fraud in the new-issues market: Empirical evidence on securities class actions
Bohn, J
Choi, S
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 1996, 144 (03) : 903 - 982
[6] Working Hard or Making Work? Plaintiffs' Attorney Fees in Securities Fraud Class Actions
Choi, Stephen J.
Erickson, Jessica
Pritchard, A. C.
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES, 2020, 17 (03) : 438 - 465
[7] Representative Litigation in Italian Capital Markets: Italian Derivative Suits and (if ever) Securities Class Actions
Giudici, Paolo
EUROPEAN COMPANY AND FINANCIAL LAW REVIEW, 2009, 6 (2-3): : 246 - 269
[8] ALLOCATION OF SETTLEMENT SUMS AND ATTORNEYS FEES BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND THE D-AND-O CARRIER IN SECURITIES FRAUD CLASS-ACTIONS
LALLI, ML
SECURITIES REGULATION LAW JOURNAL, 1995, 23 (02): : 163 - 183
[9] Highlights from the Dechert Survey of Securities Fraud Class Actions Brought Against U.S. Life Sciences Companies
Kotler, David A.
BIOTECHNOLOGY LAW REPORT, 2015, 34 (02) : 69 - 69
[10] FRAUD ON THE GLOBAL MARKET: US COURTS DON'T BUY IT; SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION IN F-CUBED SECURITIES CLASS ACTIONS
Rubenstein, Julie B.
CORNELL LAW REVIEW, 2010, 95 (03) : 627 - 655

← 1 2 →