Liberal or restrictive fluid management during elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:40
|
作者
Schol, Pim B. B. [1 ]
Terink, Ivon M. [2 ]
Lance, Marcus D. [3 ]
Scheepers, Hubertina C. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, PO 5800, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, PO 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anaesthesia & Pain Treatment, PO 5800, Maastricht 6202, AZ, Netherlands
关键词
Elective surgical procedures; Fluid therapy; Review; systematic; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; MAJOR ABDOMINAL-SURGERY; COAGULATION; RECOVERY; THERAPY; RISK; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; COMPLICATIONS; HEMODILUTION; HYPOTENSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.07.010
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
This article reviews if a restrictive fluid management policy reduces the complication rate if compared to liberal fluid management policy during elective surgery. The PubMed database was explored by 2 independent researchers. We used the following search terms: "Blood transfusion (MESH); transfusion need; fluid therapy (MESH); permissive hypotension; fluid management; resuscitation; restrictive fluid management; liberal fluid management; elective surgery; damage control resuscitation; surgical procedures, operative (MESH); wounds (MESH); injuries (MESH); surgery; trauma patients." A secondary search in the Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library revealed no additional results. We selected randomized controlled trials performed during elective surgeries. Patients were randomly assigned to a restrictive fluid management policy or to a liberal fluid management policy during elective surgery. The patient characteristics and the type of surgery varied. All but 3 studies reported American Society of Anaesthesiologists groups 1 to 3 as the inclusion criterion. The primary outcome of interest is total number of patients with a complication and the complication rate. Secondary outcome measures are infection rate, transfusion need, postoperative rebleeding, hospital stay, and renal function. In total, 1397 patients were analyzed (693 restrictive protocol, 704 liberal protocol). Meta-analysis showed that in the restrictive group as compared with the liberal group, fewer patients experienced a complication (relative risk [RR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.78). The total complication rate (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.52-0.64), risk of infection (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.79), and transfusion rate (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66-0.99) were also lower. The postoperative rebleeding did not differ in both groups: RR, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.28-2.06). We conclude that compared with a liberal fluid policy, a restrictive fluid policy in elective surgery results in a 35% reduction in patient with a complication and should be advised as the preferred fluid management policy. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 39
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Liberal versus restrictive fluid management in abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis
    Jia, Feng-Ju
    Yan, Qiao-Yuan
    Sun, Qi
    Tuxun, Tuerhongjiang
    Liu, Hui
    Shao, Li
    SURGERY TODAY, 2017, 47 (03) : 344 - 356
  • [2] Liberal versus restrictive fluid management in abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis
    Feng-Ju Jia
    Qiao-Yuan Yan
    Qi Sun
    Tuerhongjiang Tuxun
    Hui Liu
    Li Shao
    Surgery Today, 2017, 47 : 344 - 356
  • [3] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Restrictive Perioperative Fluid Management in Pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Chen, Brian P.
    Chen, Marian
    Bennett, Sean
    Lemon, Kristina
    Bertens, Kimberly A.
    Balaa, Fady K.
    Martel, Guillaume
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 42 (09) : 2938 - 2950
  • [4] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Restrictive Perioperative Fluid Management in Pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Chen, Brian P.
    Chen, Marian
    Lemon, Kristina
    Bennett, Sean
    Eltawil, Karim M.
    Mimeault, Richard
    Balaa, Fady K.
    Martel, Guillaume
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2016, 223 (04) : E146 - E146
  • [5] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Restrictive Perioperative Fluid Management in Pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Brian P. Chen
    Marian Chen
    Sean Bennett
    Kristina Lemon
    Kimberly A. Bertens
    Fady K. Balaa
    Guillaume Martel
    World Journal of Surgery, 2018, 42 : 2938 - 2950
  • [6] Restrictive Versus Liberal Fluid Regimens in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Mikaela L. Garland
    Hamish S. Mace
    Andrew D. MacCormick
    Stuart A. McCluskey
    Nicholas J. Lightfoot
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2019, 23 : 1250 - 1265
  • [7] Restrictive Versus Liberal Fluid Regimens in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Garland, Mikaela L.
    Mace, Hamish S.
    MacCormick, Andrew D.
    McCluskey, Stuart A.
    Lightfoot, Nicholas J.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2019, 23 (06) : 1250 - 1265
  • [8] Restrictive Versus Liberal Fluid Regimen in Refractory Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Abdelbaky, Ahmed M.
    Elmasry, Wael G.
    Awad, Ahmed H.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [9] RESTRICTIVE VERSUS LIBERAL TRANSFUSION STRATEGIES IN CARDIAC SURGERY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS WITH TRIAL SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS
    Kashani, Hessam
    Lodewyks, Carly
    Kavosh, Morvarid S.
    Neilson, Christine
    Rabbani, Rasheda
    Abou-Setta, Ahmed
    Grocott, Hilary P.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 128 : 104 - 107
  • [10] Effect of the Type of Intraoperative Restrictive Fluid Management on the Outcome of Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Jian
    Sun, Wenchong
    Fan, Zhongbao
    An, Xin
    Pei, Ling
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2020, 2020