The effects of agroecological farming systems on smallholder livelihoods: a case study on push-pull system from Western Kenya

被引:30
|
作者
D'Annolfo, Raffaele [1 ]
Gemmill-Herren, Barbara [2 ]
Amudavi, David [3 ]
Shiraku, Hudson W. [3 ]
Piva, Mariacristina [4 ]
Garibaldi, Lucas A. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Doctoral Sch Agrofood Syst Agrisyst, Via Emilia Parmense 84, I-29122 Piacenza, Italy
[2] World Agroforestry Ctr, Nairobi, Kenya
[3] Biovis Africa Trust, Nairobi, Kenya
[4] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Econ Policy, Piacenza, Italy
[5] Univ Nacl Rio Negro UNRN, Inst Invest Recursos Nat Agroecol & Desarrollo Ru, Sede Andina, San Carlos De Bariloche, Rio Negro, Argentina
[6] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn CONICET, San Carlos De Bariloche, Rio Negro, Argentina
关键词
Agroecology; push-pull system; integrated pest management; participatory assessment; sustainable livelihood framework; Kenya; INTEGRATED PEST-MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION; ECONOMIC-PERFORMANCE; AGRICULTURE; TECHNOLOGY; FOOD; BIODIVERSITY; ECOLOGY; STRIGA;
D O I
10.1080/14735903.2020.1822639
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
There is a need for scaling-up agroecology to promote sustainable agriculture at global level. Although, recent studies show that agroecological approaches can achieve both high yields and profits compared with conventional systems, the performance of other socioeconomic indicators remains unknown. This study has two objectives (i) identify the main characteristics of small-scale producers who represent the target-groups of the SDG 2; (ii) provide a comparison between push-pull and conventional farming systems of maize production to explore and possibly implement sustainable systems. In collaboration with Biovision Africa Trust, a participatory assessment framework was implemented in Western Kenya. Twenty-three farmers were selected and data were analysed showing that the push-pull contributes to social/cultural and natural/ecological capitals. In particular, push-pull farmers are more focused on socially oriented groups (75%); moreover, they cultivate smaller plots (1.9 ha) compared to conventional farmers (3.1 ha) without showing a reduction in profitability. The benefits of adopting push-pull system indicated by farmers (e.g. diminishedStrigaweed) are consistent with the advantages reported in relevant scientific literature. Considering the explorative nature of this study, the article makes a key contribution by pointing towards important questions for future research on agroecology in Sub-Saharan African countries.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 70
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Economic performance of the 'push-pull' technology for stemborer and Striga control in smallholder farming systems in western Kenya
    Khan, Zeyaur R.
    Midega, Charles A. O.
    Njuguna, Esther M.
    Arnudavi, David M.
    Wanyama, Japhether M.
    Pickett, John A.
    CROP PROTECTION, 2008, 27 (07) : 1084 - 1097
  • [2] Push-pull farming system in Kenya: Implications for economic and social welfare
    Kassie, Menale
    Stage, Jesper
    Diiro, Gracious
    Muriithi, Beatrice
    Muricho, Geoffrey
    Ledermann, Samuel T.
    Pittchar, Jimmy
    Midega, Charles
    Khan, Zeyaur
    LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 77 : 186 - 198
  • [3] Push-pull technology improves carbon stocks in rainfed smallholder agriculture in Western Kenya
    Ndayisaba, Pierre Celestin
    Kuyah, Shem
    Midega, Charles Aura Odhiambo
    Mwangi, Peter Njoroge
    Khan, Zeyaur Rahman
    CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2022, 13 (01) : 127 - 141
  • [4] Farmers' perceived pathways for further intensification of push-pull systems in Western Kenya
    Buleti, Sylvia Imbuhila
    Kuyah, Shem
    Olagoke, Adewole
    Gichua, Moses
    Were, Samuel
    Chidawanyika, Frank
    Martin, Emily A.
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2023, 7
  • [5] Structure, tree diversity, and aboveground carbon stocks of smallholder farms with push-pull technology in western Kenya
    Imbaya, Elisheba Amolo
    Kuyah, Shem
    Gichua, Moses
    Were, Samuel
    TREES FORESTS AND PEOPLE, 2024, 17
  • [6] Improving rural livelihoods as a “moving target”: trajectories of change in smallholder farming systems of Western Kenya
    Diego Valbuena
    Jeroen C. J. Groot
    John Mukalama
    Bruno Gérard
    Pablo Tittonell
    Regional Environmental Change, 2015, 15 : 1395 - 1407
  • [7] Improving rural livelihoods as a "moving target": trajectories of change in smallholder farming systems of Western Kenya
    Valbuena, Diego
    Groot, Jeroen C. J.
    Mukalama, John
    Gerard, Bruno
    Tittonell, Pablo
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2015, 15 (07) : 1395 - 1407
  • [8] How to Effectively Enhance Sustainable Livelihoods in Smallholder Systems: A Comparative Study from Western Kenya
    Fuchs, Lisa Elena
    Orero, Levi
    Namoi, Nictor
    Neufeldt, Henry
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (06)
  • [9] Achieving a Climate-Change Resilient Farming System through Push-Pull Technology: Evidence from Maize Farming Systems in Ethiopia
    Gugissa, Desalegn A.
    Abro, Zewdu
    Tefera, Tadele
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (05)
  • [10] Determining smallholder farmers' preferences for technology dissemination pathways: the case of 'push-pull' technology in the control of stemborer and Striga weeds in Kenya
    Murage, A. W.
    Amudavi, D. M.
    Obare, G.
    Chianu, J.
    Midega, C. A. O.
    Pickett, J. A.
    Khan, Z. R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEST MANAGEMENT, 2011, 57 (02) : 133 - 145