Rectal mucosal electrosensitivity - What is being tested?

被引:15
|
作者
Meagher, AP [1 ]
Kennedy, ML [1 ]
Lubowski, DZ [1 ]
机构
[1] ST GEORGE HOSP, COLORECTAL UNIT, KOGARAH, NSW 2217, AUSTRALIA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF00418852
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The results of rectal mucosal electrosensitivity (RME) testing have been used to support theories regarding the aetiology of both idiopathic constipation and bowel dysfunction following rectopexy. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of tests of RME. Sixty-eight patients, comprising three groups (group 1: 50 patients undergoing assessment in the Anorectal Physiology Unit, group 2: 10 patients with coloanal or ileoanal anastomosis, group 3: 8 patients with a stoma) underwent mucosal electrosensitivity testing, with the threshold stimulus required to elicit sensation being recorded. In addition the RME was measured in groups 1 and 2 when placing the electrode, mounted on a catheter with a central wire, against the anterior, posterior, right and left rectal or neorectal walls. To assess the influence on this test of loss of mucosal contact due to faeces, a further 8 cases with a normal rectum had RME performed with and without a layer of water soaked gauze around the electrode to stimulate faeces and prevent the electrode from making contact with the rectal mucosa. There was marked variance in the sensitivity of the different regions of rectal wall tested (P < 0.0001). In group I patients the mean sensitivities were: central 36.6 mA, anterior 27.4 mA, posterior 37.9 mA, right 22.3 mA and left 25.6 mA. This circumferential variation suggests that the pelvic floor rather than rectal mucosa was being stimulated. All patients in group 2 had recordable sensitivities, and the mean sensitivity threshold was significantly higher than group 1 patients in the central (P = 0.03), right (P = 0.03) and left (P = 0.007) positions. In group 3 the sensitivity was greater within the stoma at the level of the abdominal wall muscle than intraabdominally or subcutaneously, again suggesting an extra-colonic origin of the sensation. The sensitivity threshold was significantly greater with the electrode wrapped in gauze (P < 0.01), and loss of mucosal contact was not detected by the EMG machine. Therefore RME testing would seem not to measure mucosal sensitivity, and is probably influenced by the presence of faeces.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 33
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] WHAT IS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERINEAL DESCENT AND ANAL MUCOSAL ELECTROSENSITIVITY
    GEE, AS
    MILLS, A
    DURDEY, P
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1995, 38 (04) : 419 - 423
  • [2] Relation between anal electrosensitivity and rectal filling sensation and the influence of age
    Broens, PMA
    Penninckx, FM
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (01) : 127 - 133
  • [3] Are We Being "Tested" ?
    Benson, John
    DIALOG-A JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY, 2016, 55 (03): : 183 - 184
  • [4] Obesity Coverage on Medical Licensing Examinations in the United States. What Is Being Tested?
    Kushner, Robert F.
    Butsch, W. Scott
    Kahan, Scott
    Machineni, Sriram
    Cook, Stephen
    Aronne, Louis J.
    TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2017, 29 (02) : 123 - 128
  • [5] Do we know what skills our students think are being tested in exams?
    Lingard, Jennifer
    Minasian-Batmanian, Laura
    Cathers, Ian
    Mahony, Mary-Jane
    Vella, Gilbert
    WHO'S LEARNING? WHOSE TECHNOLOGY?, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 982 - +
  • [6] Partner swaps being tested
    Jacobs, O.
    Rüdiger, G.
    Schädel, B.
    Mou, H.
    Tribologie und Schmierungstechnik, 2010, 57 (01): : 17 - 22
  • [7] ALARM SYSTEM BEING TESTED
    BUCK, M
    STAUB REINHALTUNG DER LUFT, 1985, 45 (03): : R1 - R1
  • [8] PRACTICES ARE BEING CHANGED AND TESTED
    ELLIS, B
    HOSPITALS, 1980, 54 (07): : 65 - 68
  • [9] Forming Fabric being tested
    Infante, Gerardo
    Hahn, Jochen
    WOCHENBLATT FUR PAPIERFABRIKATION, 2013, 141 (05): : 302 - 303
  • [10] RECTAL MUCOSAL REPLACEMENT
    PECK, DA
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1980, 191 (03) : 294 - 303