Sample preparation methods for determination of Cd, Pb and Sn in meat samples by GFAAS: use of acid digestion associated with a cold finger apparatus versus solubilization methods

被引:20
|
作者
Oreste, Eliezer Quadro [1 ]
de Oliveira, Richard Macedo [1 ]
Nunes, Adriane Medeiros [1 ]
Vieira, Mariana Antunes [1 ]
Ribeiro, Anderson Schwingel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pelotas, Ctr Ciencias Quim Farmaceut & Alimentos, Programa Posgrad Quim, Lab Metrol Quim, BR-96160000 Capao Do Leao, RS, Brazil
关键词
ATOMIC-ABSORPTION-SPECTROMETRY; MICROWAVE-ASSISTED DIGESTION; BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES; TOTAL MERCURY; TETRAMETHYLAMMONIUM HYDROXIDE; FORMIC-ACID; LEAD; ALKALINE; CADMIUM; METALS;
D O I
10.1039/c3ay26454h
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to present three sample preparation methods for the determination of Cd, Pb and Sn in meat by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (GFAAS): acid digestion, solubilization with tetramethylammonium hydroxide and formic acid. For the digestion with HNO3, a conventional open system with a cold finger was used. This system helped to avoid losses of analytes and reagents by volatilization, permitting to operate at high temperatures applied at a digester block and reducing the digestion time (similar to 1 h). Solubilizations were performed at room temperature. The slurry was left standing overnight and remained closed until achieving complete solubilization. The temperature program of the graphite furnace was optimized for each element in the different means of preparation samples using a mixture of Pd-Mg. The figures of merit were similar for all sample preparation methods evaluated. The limits of detection obtained for the acid digestion procedure were 0.0006, 0.0164 and 0.0520 mu g g(-1) for Cd, Pb and Sn, respectively. In order to evaluate the accuracy of the results obtained by the three sample preparation methods, recovery tests for four real meat samples were performed and the recoveries ranged from 93.7 to 109%, supporting the accuracy of the method. Also, different certified reference materials of meat were analyzed and the results obtained were in agreement with the certified value at 95% of confidence (t-test). The best results were obtained by the acid digestion procedure with the cold finger system. This procedure is faster, the system is semi-closed with no significant contamination or loss of analytes by volatilization and it provides a better signal/noise ratio.
引用
收藏
页码:1590 / 1595
页数:6
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Simple and Robust GFAAS Methods for Determination of As, Cd, and Pb in Hemp Products Using Different Sample Preparation Strategies
    Ribeiro Menezes, Iohanna M. N.
    Nascimento, Patricia de A.
    Gonzalez, Mario H.
    Oliveira, Andrea
    FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS, 2021, 14 (05) : 1043 - 1053
  • [2] Simple and Robust GFAAS Methods for Determination of As, Cd, and Pb in Hemp Products Using Different Sample Preparation Strategies
    Iohanna M. N. Ribeiro Menezes
    Patricia de A. Nascimento
    Mario H. Gonzalez
    Andrea Oliveira
    Food Analytical Methods, 2021, 14 : 1043 - 1053
  • [3] Evaluation of Sample Preparation Methods Based on Alkaline and Acid Solubilization for the Determination of Na and K in Meat Samples by Atomic Spectrometric Techniques
    da Silva, Caroline S.
    Nunes, Adriane M.
    Oreste, Eliezer Q.
    Acunha, Tanize S.
    Vieira, Mariana A.
    Ribeiro, Anderson S.
    JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 23 (09) : 1623 - 1629
  • [4] Evaluation of sample preparation methods for the determination of As, Cd, Pb, and Se in rice samples by GF AAS
    de Oliveira, Richard Macedo
    Nascimento Antunes, Ana Clara
    Vieira, Mariana Antunes
    Medina, Aline Lisboa
    Ribeiro, Anderson Schwingel
    MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 124 : 402 - 409
  • [5] Evaluation of sample preparation methods for cereal digestion for subsequent As, Cd, Hg and Pb determination by AAS-based techniques
    Souza, Juliana P.
    Cerveira, Camila
    Miceli, Tatiane M.
    Moraes, Diogo P.
    Mesko, Marcia F.
    Pereira, Juliana S. F.
    FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2020, 321