Pricing methods in outcome-based contracting: δ2: willingness-to-pay-based pricing

被引:2
|
作者
Alkhatib, Nimer S. [1 ,2 ]
Ramos, Kenneth [3 ]
Erstad, Brian [1 ,4 ]
Slack, Marion [1 ,4 ]
McBride, Ali [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Bhattacharjee, Sandipan [1 ,4 ]
Abraham, Ivo [1 ,4 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Pharm, Ctr Hlth Outcomes & PharmacoEcon Res, Drachman Hall B-306,1295 N Martin Ave, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Al Zaytoonah Univ Jordan, Coll Pharm, Amman, Jordan
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Inst BioSci & Technol, Houston, TX USA
[4] Univ Arizona, Dept Pharm Practice & Sci, Coll Pharm, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[5] Banner Univ Med Ctr, Tucson, AZ USA
[6] Univ Arizona, Canc Ctr, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[7] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Family & Community Med, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[8] Matrix45, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
Willingness-to-pay; outcome-based-contracting; pricing methods; osimertinib; lung cancer; D40; C00; COST-EFFECTIVENESS THRESHOLDS;
D O I
10.1080/13696998.2020.1815026
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Aims Six Delta is a six-dimensional independent platform for outcome-based pricing/contracting. The second dimension (delta 2) estimates prices on the basis of four willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. We describe this dimension's methodology and present a proof-of-concept application to the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutation with osimertinib. Materials and methods Eight WTP scenarios based on four levels of real gross domestic product per capita (<1GDP/capita, 1 x GDP/capita, 3 x GDP/capita, and >3 x GDP/capita) and two market conditions (monopolistic versus competitive) were assumed. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was applied to differently to both markets. In the monopolistic market, assuming no competitors, the cost/QALY ratio for a drug was used; whereas in the competitive market, assuming competitors, the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was applied. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed and predictive equations were specified to estimate the prices of treatment for the resulting eight WTP scenarios; for which subsequently the average and standard deviation were calculated. A gamma distribution was specified and Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) was applied to estimate the dimension-specific price based on WTP (DSPWTP). A proof-of-concept exercise with osimertinib in NSCLC was performed for two hypothetical outcome-based contracts: 1-year (2019-2020) and 2-year (2019-2021). The 2018 wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) of $14,616 (30-day prescription) was used to estimate the DSP(WTP)for each contract. Results The 1-year estimates averaged $4,654 (SD=$6,462) and the MCS yielded a DSP(WTP)of $4,547 or -68.89% of the 2018 WAC for a 30-day prescription. The 2-year estimates averaged $4,7667 (SD=$6,480) with the MCS generating a DSP(WTP)of $4,704 or -67.82% of the WAC. Conclusions We demonstrated that WTP-based methods that include various WTP thresholds and market conditions generate price estimates across these thresholds and market conditions that can be integrated into our proposed Six Delta platform for outcome-based pricing/contracting.
引用
收藏
页码:1223 / 1229
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pricing methods in outcome-based contracting: δ4: safety-based pricing
    Alkhatib, Nimer S.
    Bhattacharjee, Sandipan
    McBride, Ali
    Ramos, Kenneth
    Slack, Marion
    Erstad, Brian
    Abraham, Ivo
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 23 (11) : 1237 - 1245
  • [2] Pricing methods in outcome-based contracting: δ6: adherence-based pricing
    Alkhatib, Nimer S.
    Slack, Marion
    Bhattacharjee, Sandipan
    Erstad, Brian
    Ramos, Kenneth
    McBride, Ali
    Abraham, Ivo
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 23 (11) : 1256 - 1265
  • [3] Pricing methods in outcome-based contracting: δ3: reference-based pricing
    Alkhatib, Nimer S.
    Erstad, Brian
    Ramos, Kenneth
    McBride, Ali
    Bhattacharjee, Sandipan
    Slack, Marion
    Abraham, Ivo
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 23 (11) : 1230 - 1236
  • [4] Pricing methods in outcome-based contracting: δ5: risk of efficacy failure-based pricing
    Alkhatib, Nimer S.
    McBride, Ali
    Bhattacharjee, Sandipan
    Ramos, Kenneth
    Erstad, Brian
    Slack, Marion
    Billheimer, Dean
    Abraham, Ivo
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 23 (11) : 1246 - 1255
  • [5] Pricing methods in outcome-based contracting: δ1: cost effectiveness analysis and cost-utility analysis-based pricing
    Alkhatib, Nimer S.
    Ramos, Kenneth
    Erstad, Brian
    Slack, Marion
    McBride, Ali
    Bhattacharjee, Sandipan
    Abraham, Ivo
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 23 (11) : 1215 - 1222
  • [6] Pricing methods in outcome-based contracting: integration analysis of the six dimensions (6 δs)
    Alkhatib, Nimer S.
    McBride, Ali
    Slack, Marion
    Bhattacharjee, Sandipan
    Erstad, Brian
    Ramos, Kenneth
    Abraham, Ivo
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 23 (11) : 1266 - 1272
  • [7] Outcome-Based Pricing for New Pharmaceuticals via Rebates
    Adida, Elodie
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2021, 67 (02) : 892 - 913
  • [8] Heart drug pushes outcome-based pricing plans
    Senior, Melanie
    NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2015, 14 (10) : 665 - U14
  • [9] Heart drug pushes outcome-based pricing plans
    Melanie Senior
    Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2015, 14 : 665 - 667
  • [10] A new approach to pharmaceutical pricing based on patients' willingness to pay
    Rahimi, Farimah
    Rasekh, Hamid Reza
    Abbasian, Ezatollah
    Peiravian, Farzad
    TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2018, 23 (12) : 1326 - 1331