The third man; Or, agency in history; Or rationality revolution

被引:12
|
作者
Aya, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1111/0018-2656.00186
中图分类号
K [历史、地理];
学科分类号
06 ;
摘要
Theories of revolution invoke human agency to commit the violence that revolution entails, yet theorist of revolution often denounce the general theory of human agency called rational choice because (they say) it does not explain macrosocial facts like revolution and also leaves out culture. Actually, however, rational choice is the major premise of any cogent explanation of revolution, and it includes culture as a factual premise. Rational-choice theory applied to explaining revolution dates back to Thucydides, whose method of explanation is sound and whose theory of revolution is true. Thucydides explains the macrosocial fact of revolution by way of models whose elements are people doing what they hope will succeed, that is, acting on opinion alias culture. Theorists of revolution who make sense of it all rehearse Thucydidies: they analyze the narrative history into strategic actions and reactions, explain these actions and reactions by rational choice, and document the explanation with direct and circumstantial evidence for hope of success, though they seldom own up on theory or preach what they practice.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 153
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条