Deterring Cheating in Online Environments

被引:58
|
作者
Corrigan-Gibbs, Henry [1 ]
Gupta, Nakull [2 ]
Northcutt, Curtis [3 ]
Cutrell, Edward [2 ]
Thies, William [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Microsoft Res India, Bangalore 560001, Karnataka, India
[3] MIT, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
Cheating; honor code; massive open online course (MOOC); Mechanical Turk; honey pot; warning; crowdsourcing; ACADEMIC INTEGRITY; MECHANICAL TURK; DISHONESTY; HONESTY; DEPLETION; BEHAVIOR; OATH;
D O I
10.1145/2810239
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Many Internet services depend on the integrity of their users, even when these users have strong incentives to behave dishonestly. Drawing on experiments in two different online contexts, this study measures the prevalence of cheating and evaluates two different methods for deterring it. Our first experiment investigates cheating behavior in a pair of online exams spanning 632 students in India. Our second experiment examines dishonest behavior on Mechanical Turk through an online task with 2,378 total participants. Using direct measurements that are not dependent on self-reports, we detect significant rates of cheating in both environments. We confirm that honor codes despite frequent use in massive open online courses (MOOCs) lead to only a small and insignificant reduction in online cheating behaviors. To overcome these challenges, we propose a new intervention: a stern warning that spells out the potential consequences of cheating. We show that the warning leads to a significant (about twofold) reduction in cheating, consistent across experiments. We also characterize the demographic correlates of cheating on Mechanical Turk. Our findings advance the understanding of cheating in online environments, and suggest that replacing traditional honor codes with warnings could be a simple and effective way to deter cheating in online courses and online labor marketplaces.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Proctorfree: Deterring online cheating
    Gill, Grandon, 1600, Informing Science Institute (02):
  • [2] Techniques for detecting and deterring cheating in home exams in programming
    Sindre, Guttorm
    Haugset, Borge
    2022 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE, FIE, 2022,
  • [3] Suspicions of Cheating in an Online Class
    Davis, Julia
    JOURNAL OF CASES ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 13 (04) : 31 - 37
  • [4] Cheating Behaviors in Online Gaming
    Duh, Henry Been-Lirn
    Chen, Vivian Hsueh Hua
    ONLINE COMMUNITIES AND SOCIAL COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5621 : 567 - +
  • [5] An Investigation of Cheating in Online Games
    Yan, Jeff
    Randell, Brian
    IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY, 2009, 7 (03) : 37 - 44
  • [6] Students' Online Cheating Reasons and Strategies: EFL Teachers' Strategies to Abolish Cheating in Online Examinations
    Taherkhani, Reza
    Aref, Saba
    JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC ETHICS, 2024, 22 (03) : 539 - 559
  • [7] Deterring Unethical Behavior in Online Labor Markets
    Brink, William D.
    Eaton, Tim V.
    Grenier, Jonathan H.
    Reffett, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2019, 156 (01) : 71 - 88
  • [8] Detecting and Deterring Information Search in Online Surveys
    Graham, Matthew H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 68 (04) : 1315 - 1334
  • [9] Cheating in online courses: Evidence from online proctoring
    Dendir, Seife
    Maxwell, R. Stockton
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR REPORTS, 2020, 2
  • [10] Deterring Unethical Behavior in Online Labor Markets
    William D. Brink
    Tim V. Eaton
    Jonathan H. Grenier
    Andrew Reffett
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2019, 156 : 71 - 88