Simulating Hydrate Growth and Transport Behavior in Gas-Dominant Flow

被引:39
|
作者
Charlton, Thomas B. [1 ,2 ]
Di Lorenzo, Mauricio [1 ,4 ]
Zerpa, Luis E. [3 ]
Koh, Carolyn A. [2 ]
Johns, Michael L. [1 ]
May, Eric F. [1 ]
Aman, Zachary M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Mech & Chem Engn, Fluid Sci & Resources Div, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Colorado Sch Mines, Ctr Hydrate Res, 1500 Illinois St, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[3] Colorado Sch Mines, Dept Petr Engn, 1500 Illinois St, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[4] CSIRO Energy, 26 Dick Perry Ave, Kensington, WA 6151, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
ANNULAR-FLOW; DEPOSITION; SYSTEMS; PIPES; WATER; LOOP; METHANE; SURFACE; MODEL; OIL;
D O I
10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b02199
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The current hydrate kinetics model implemented in the multiphase flow simulator OLGA treats hydrate growth in oil-continuous systems by considering the solidification of emulsified water droplets to form a hydrate-in-oil slurry that is assumed to be stable. To date, the validity of this model has not been established for gas-dominant systems, where gas void fractions can exceed 90 vol %. Here, six experimental data sets, collected using a 40-m single-pass gas-dominant flowloop operating in the annular-flow regime, were compared with predictions made using the current hydrate kinetics model. The comparison identified discrepancies in the predicted flow regime and the gas water interfacial area that significantly affect kinetic hydrate-growth-rate calculations; these discrepancies might be due, in part, to differences in dynamic similarity between flowloop experiments and industrial-scale simulations. By adjusting only the kinetic rate scaling factor, it was not possible to match the pressure drop observed experimentally, illustrating that the formation of a viscous hydrate slurry alone cannot account for the resistance to flow observed in gas-dominant systems. We demonstrate that it is possible to emulate deposition in the current model by adjusting the slip ratio between the hydrate particles and the condensed phases; this approach allowed stenosis-type restrictions to occur in the simulation, as well as pressure-drop behavior similar to that observed experimentally. Utilizing a simple in-house model with empirical correlations to predict the hydrodynamics, it is possible to match relatively closely the measured growth rate and pressure drop simultaneously. Such agreement could not be reached using the current hydrate implementation available in OLGA, highlighting the need for a gas-specific hydrate growth model that is capable of capturing both hydrate growth from suspended droplets in the gas phase and solid growth at the flowline wall, as well as the extent of hydrate deposition on the wall.
引用
收藏
页码:1012 / 1023
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Underinhibited Hydrate Formation and Transport Investigated Using a Single-Pass Gas-Dominant Flow loop
    Di Lorenzo, Mauricio
    Aman, Zachary M.
    Kozielski, Karen
    Norris, Bruce W. E.
    Johns, Michael L.
    May, Eric F.
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2014, 28 (11) : 7274 - 7284
  • [2] Modelling hydrate deposition and sloughing in gas-dominant pipelines
    Di Lorenzo, Mauricio
    Aman, Zachary M.
    Kozielski, Karen
    Norris, Bruce W. E.
    Johns, Michael L.
    May, Eric F.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THERMODYNAMICS, 2018, 117 : 81 - 90
  • [3] Reviews of gas hydrate inhibitors in gas-dominant pipelines and application of kinetic hydrate inhibitors in China
    Wang, Yanhong
    Fan, Shuanshi
    Lang, Xuemei
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 27 (09) : 2118 - 2132
  • [4] Reviews of gas hydrate inhibitors in gas-dominant pipelines and application of kinetic hydrate inhibitors in China
    Yanhong Wang
    Shuanshi Fan
    Xuemei Lang
    ChineseJournalofChemicalEngineering, 2019, 27 (09) : 2118 - 2132
  • [5] Hydrate Deposition Model and Flow Assurance Technology in Gas-Dominant Pipeline Transportation Systems: A Review
    Zhang, Shu-wei
    Shang, Li-yan
    Zhou, Li
    Lv, Zhen-bo
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2022, 36 (04) : 1747 - 1775
  • [6] Hydrate Formation in Gas-Dominant Systems Using a Single-Pass Flowloop
    Di Lorenzo, Mauricio
    Aman, Zachary M.
    Soto, Gerardo Sanchez
    Johns, Michael
    Kozielski, Karen A.
    May, Eric F.
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2014, 28 (05) : 3043 - 3052
  • [7] Modelling Hydrate Deposition in Gas-Dominant Subsea Pipelines in Operating and Shutdown Scenarios
    Umuteme, Oghenethoja Monday
    Islam, Sheikh Zahidul
    Hossain, Mamdud
    Karnik, Aditya
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (18)
  • [8] Hydrate formation and deposition in a gas-dominant flowloop: Initial studies of the effect of velocity and subcooling
    Aman, Zachary M.
    Di Lorenzo, Mauricio
    Kozielski, Karen
    Koh, Carolyn A.
    Warrier, Pramod
    Johns, Michael L.
    May, Eric F.
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 35 : 1490 - 1498
  • [9] CFD simulation of sand particle erosion in gas-dominant multiphase flow
    Parsi, Mazdak
    Agrawal, Madhusuden
    Srinivasan, Vedanth
    Vieira, Ronald E.
    Torres, Carlos F.
    McLaury, Brenton S.
    Shirazi, Siamack A.
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 27 : 706 - 718
  • [10] Experimental Investigation on Hydrate Plugging Formation in Horizontal Single-Pass Gas-Dominant Flows
    Zhang, Jianbo
    Chen, Longqiao
    Pan, Shaowei
    Liu, Hui
    Ma, Yongle
    Pei, Jihao
    Sun, Baojiang
    Wang, Zhiyuan
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2022, 36 (07) : 3570 - 3579