The efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal and proximal ureteral calculi of 2 cm: A retrospective study

被引:16
|
作者
Jiao, Binbin [1 ,2 ]
Lai, Shicong [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Xu, Xin [2 ]
Zhang, Meng [1 ,2 ]
Diao, Tongxiang [5 ]
Zhang, Guan [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, China Japan Friendship Sch Clin Med, Chaoyang Dist, Peoples R China
[2] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Dept Urol, Chaoyang Dist, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Union Med Coll, Grad Sch, Dongcheng Dist, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Dongcheng Dist, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Hosp, Dept Urol, Dongcheng Dist, Peoples R China
[6] Peking Union Med Coll, China Japan Friendship Inst Clin Med, Grad Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
efficacy; flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy; kidney stone; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY; KIDNEY-STONES; MICROPERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; MANAGEMENT; COMPLICATIONS; DIAGNOSIS; DIAMETER; OUTCOMES; SAFETY; COST;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000014535
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To assess the clinical effect of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) and flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy (FURL) for the treatment of renal and proximal ureteral calculi of 2 cm.A retrospective analysis was carried out on clinical data of 106 patients with kidney or upper urethral calculi. Among these patients, 58 underwent the MPCNL, and 48 received FURL. Stone-free rates, operating time, blood loss, hemoglobin drop, length of hospital stay, complications, and renal damage indexes were compared.The stone removal rates of the FURL and MPCNL groups were 81.25% versus 87.93% (p>.05). Although operating time was significantly shorter in the MPCNL group, hospital stays were significantly shorter in the FURL group. In addition, pooled analysis showed that mean estimated blood loss was significantly higher in the PCNL group but the hemoglobin decline of the FURL group and PCNL group had no significant difference. The PCNL group had no significant difference in complications compared to the FURL group. Differences on the creatinine levels and urea nitrogen levels before the operation and after the operation were not statistically significant.FURL is an effective method for treating renal stone. FURL not only had a similar stone-free rate as compared to MPCNL but also was associated with less blood loss and more favorable recovery time. However, FURL had a longer operative time.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Efficacy on Flexible Ureteroscopy Lithotripsy and Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Medium-Sized Lower-Pole Renal Calculi
    Jin, Lianchao
    Yang, Bing
    Zhou, Zhe
    Li, Ningchen
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2019, 33 (11) : 914 - 919
  • [2] Comparison of efficacy and safety between flexible ureteroscopy-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy for the treatment of complicated renal calculi
    Hong, Xin
    Wang, Xiaofeng
    Yang, Bo
    Wang, Tian
    Yu, Chengfan
    Li, Hui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (09): : 18537 - 18542
  • [3] Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of intermediate proximal ureteral and renal stones in the elderly
    Hu, Henglong
    Lu, Yuchao
    He, Deng
    Cui, Lei
    Zhang, Jiaqiao
    Zhao, Zhenyu
    Qin, Baolong
    Wang, Yufeng
    Lin, Feng
    Wang, Shaogang
    UROLITHIASIS, 2016, 44 (05) : 427 - 434
  • [4] Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of intermediate proximal ureteral and renal stones in the elderly
    Henglong Hu
    Yuchao Lu
    Deng He
    Lei Cui
    Jiaqiao Zhang
    Zhenyu Zhao
    Baolong Qin
    Yufeng Wang
    Feng Lin
    Shaogang Wang
    Urolithiasis, 2016, 44 : 427 - 434
  • [5] The outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy for renal calculi of 2 cm or more with and without the use of ureteral access sheath: A retrospective study
    Fathi, Basem A.
    Elgammal, Ahmed A.
    Abouelgreed, Tamer A.
    Ghoneimy, Osama M.
    Aboelsaad, Ahmed Y.
    Alhefnawy, Mohamed A.
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2023, 95 (03)
  • [6] Flexible ureteroscopy and mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal lithiasis less or equal to 2 cm
    Ferroud, V.
    Lapouge, O.
    Dousseau, A.
    Rakototiana, A.
    Robert, G.
    Ballanger, P.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2011, 21 (02): : 79 - 84
  • [7] Comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of 2 and 3 cm renal lithiasis
    Fernandez Alcalde, A. A.
    Ruiz Hernandez, M.
    Gomez dos Santos, V.
    Sanchez Guerrero, C.
    Diaz Perez, D. E.
    Arias Funez, F.
    Laso Garcia, I.
    Duque Ruiz, G.
    Burgos Revilla, F. J.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2019, 43 (03): : 111 - 117
  • [8] Re: Comparison of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of Intermediate Proximal Ureteral and Renal Stones in the Elderly
    Griebling, Tomas L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (01): : 173 - 174
  • [9] Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy
    Preminger, GM
    UROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 34 (02): : 108 - 111
  • [10] Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy
    Glenn M. Preminger
    Urological Research, 2006, 34 : 108 - 111