A taxonomic review of methods and tools applied in technology assessment

被引:161
作者
Tran, Thien A. [1 ]
Daim, Tugrul [1 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Dept Engn & Technol Management, Portland, OR 97207 USA
关键词
Technology assessment; Decision making methods and tools; Public decision making; Business and non government decision making;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Technology Assessment (TA) has been a growing field of management study for the past four decades. An increasing number of studies have been carried out over the years contributing to the development of TA literature. Some of these studies summarized the history and growth of the field during its evolution. However, there has been no effort made to present an overview of the methods and tools that have been cited in TA literature. This paper attempts to fill that void. A thorough review of the TA articles published in leading journals in the management of technology field is conducted to identify the research methods or tools in those studies. The paper provides an introductory review of the use of technology assessment terminology during its development, which helps the readers avoid the confusion of the TA concept since its origination in public decision making forty years ago and where it is now - widely adopted in other sectors. A thorough presentation of the approaches, methods and tools that have been introduced or employed in both mainstream TA and "inverted TA" studies is then provided. The main content of the paper is related to the works published in leading international journals that involve certain research methods or techniques. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1396 / 1405
页数:10
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ENG MANAGEMENT J
[2]   Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies [J].
Assefa, G. ;
Frostell, B. .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2007, 29 (01) :63-78
[3]   THEORY AND PRACTICE OF INTEGRATED IMPACT ASSESSMENT - THE CASE OF THE WESTERN ENERGY STUDY [J].
BALLARD, SC ;
HALL, TA .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 1984, 25 (01) :37-48
[4]  
BANULS VA, 2006, SBAM FORECAST SOC CH
[5]   A NEW METHOD TO EVALUATE THE SPECIFIC AND GLOBAL ADVANTAGE OF A TECHNOLOGY [J].
BARBIROLI, G .
TECHNOVATION, 1990, 10 (02) :73-93
[6]   A 2-PHASE METHODOLOGY FOR TECHNOLOGY SELECTION AND SYSTEM-DESIGN [J].
BARD, JF ;
FEINBERG, A .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1989, 36 (01) :28-36
[7]   EMERGING TECHNOLOGY-EVALUATION METHODOLOGY - WITH APPLICATION TO MICRO-ELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS [J].
BENSON, B ;
SAGE, AP ;
COOK, G .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1993, 40 (02) :114-123
[8]   VALUE-ORIENTED POLICY GENERATION METHODOLOGY FOR TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT [J].
BERG, M ;
CHEN, K ;
ZISSIS, G .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 1976, 8 (04) :401-420
[9]   Integration of technology assessment in R&D management practices [J].
Berloznik, R ;
Van Langenhove, L .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 1998, 58 (1-2) :23-33
[10]  
BOER P, 1998, RES TECHNOL MANAGE, P45