Outcomes following electrographic seizures and electrographic status epilepticus in the pediatric and neonatal ICUs

被引:29
|
作者
Pinchefsky, Elana F. [1 ,2 ]
Hahn, Cecil D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Hosp Sick Children, Div Neurol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Paediat, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
child; electroencephalography; electrographic seizures; neonate; outcomes; TRAUMATIC BRAIN-INJURY; HYPOXIC-ISCHEMIC ENCEPHALOPATHY; CONTINUOUS ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NONCONVULSIVE SEIZURES; SPREADING DEPRESSION; ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS; CIRCULATORY ARREST; COMATOSE CHILDREN; EEG SEIZURES; RISK-FACTORS;
D O I
10.1097/WCO.0000000000000425
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose of review Increasing recognition of electrographic seizures and electrographic status epilepticus in critically ill neonates and children has highlighted the importance of identifying their potential contributions to neurological outcomes to guide optimal management. Recent findings Recent studies in children and neonates have found an independent association between increasing seizure burden and worse short-term and long-term outcomes, even after adjusting for other important contributors to outcome such as seizure cause and illness severity. The risk of worse neurological outcome has been shown to increase above a seizure burden threshold of 12-13 min/h, which is considerably lower than the conventional definition of status epilepticus of 30 min/h. Randomized controlled trials in neonates have demonstrated that electroencephalography-targeted therapy can successfully reduce seizure burden, but due to their small size these trials have not been able to demonstrate that more aggressive electroencephalography-targeted treatment of both subclinical and clinical seizures results in improved outcome. Summary Despite mounting evidence for an independent association between increasing seizure burden and worse outcome, further study is needed to determine whether early seizure identification and aggressive antiseizure treatment can improve neurodevelopmental outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 164
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Electrographic seizure burden and outcomes following pediatric status epilepticus
    Ganesan, Saptharishi Lalgudi
    Hahn, Cecil D.
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2019, 101
  • [2] NEONATAL ELECTROGRAPHIC SEIZURES
    MILLER, VS
    BROWER, MC
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1994, 35 (04) : A383 - A383
  • [3] NEONATAL SEIZURES AND ELECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS - EVALUATION AND OUTCOMES
    WICAL, BS
    PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 1994, 10 (04) : 271 - 275
  • [4] Electrographic Seizure Characteristics and Electrographic Status Epilepticus Prediction
    Fung, France W.
    Parikh, Darshana S.
    Donnelly, Maureen
    Xiao, Rui
    Topjian, Alexis A.
    Abend, Nicholas S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2025, 42 (01) : 64 - 72
  • [5] Electrographic status epilepticus and outcome
    Tatishvili, N
    Arveladze, E
    Tatishvili, S
    Gabunia, M
    Kandareli, L
    EPILEPSIA, 2003, 44 : 52 - 52
  • [6] RESIDUAL ELECTROGRAPHIC STATUS EPILEPTICUS AFTER CONTROL OF OVERT CLINICAL SEIZURES
    CRAVEN, W
    FAUGHT, E
    KUZNIECKY, R
    GILLIAM, F
    WALTON, NY
    TREIMAN, DM
    MEYERS, P
    EPILEPSIA, 1995, 36 : 246 - 246
  • [7] Electrographic seizures and status epilepticus in critically ill children and neonates with encephalopathy
    Abend, Nicholas S.
    Wusthoff, Courtney J.
    Goldberg, Ethan M.
    Dlugos, Dennis J.
    LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2013, 12 (12): : 1170 - 1179
  • [8] Electrographic status epilepticus in a pregnant patient
    Papajani, M.
    Grabova, S.
    Dashi, F.
    Kruja, J.
    EPILEPSIA, 2024, 65 : 227 - 227
  • [9] Persistent occipital electrographic status epilepticus
    Sheth, RD
    Riggs, JE
    JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY, 1999, 14 (05) : 334 - 336
  • [10] Electrographic status epilepticus and neurobehavioral outcomes in critically ill children
    Abend, Nicholas S.
    Wagenman, Katherine L.
    Blake, Taylor P.
    Schultheis, Maria T.
    Radcliffe, Jerilynn
    Berg, Robert A.
    Topjian, Alexis A.
    Dlugos, Dennis J.
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2015, 49 : 238 - 244