Mental models: An alternative evaluation of a sensemaking approach to ethics instruction

被引:63
作者
Brock, Meagan E. [1 ]
Vert, Andrew [1 ]
Kligyte, Vykinta [1 ]
Waples, Ethan P. [2 ]
Sevier, Sydney T. [3 ]
Mumford, Michael D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Psychol, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Management & Mkt, Shreveport, LA 71115 USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Anthropol, Norman, OK 73019 USA
关键词
integrity; ethics; training; evaluation; sensemaking; mental models; think-aloud;
D O I
10.1007/s11948-008-9076-3
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In spite of the wide variety of approaches to ethics training it is still debatable which approach has the highest potential to enhance professionals' integrity. The current effort assesses a novel curriculum that focuses on metacognitive reasoning strategies researchers use when making sense of day-to-day professional practices that have ethical implications. The evaluated trainings effectiveness was assessed by examining five key sensemaking processes, such as framing, emotion regulation, forecasting, self-reflection, and information integration that experts and novices apply in ethical decision-making. Mental models of trained and untrained graduate students, as well as faculty, working in the field of physical sciences were compared using a think-aloud protocol 6 months following the ethics training. Evaluation and comparison of the mental models of participants provided further validation evidence for sensemaking training. Specifically, it was found that trained students applied metacognitive reasoning strategies learned during training in their ethical decision-making that resulted in complex mental models focused on the objective assessment of the situation. Mental models of faculty and untrained students were externally-driven with a heavy focus on autobiographical processes. The study shows that sensemaking training has a potential to induce shifts in researchers' mental models by making them more cognitively complex via the use of metacognitive reasoning strategies. Furthermore, field experts may benefit from sensemaking training to improve their ethical decision-making framework in highly complex, novel, and ambiguous situations.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 472
页数:24
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Codes of ethics as signals for ethical behavior [J].
Adams, JS ;
Tashchian, A ;
Shore, TH .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2001, 29 (03) :199-211
[2]   Collective openness and other recommendations for the promotion of research integrity [J].
Anderson, Melissa S. .
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2007, 13 (04) :387-394
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1976, TRAINING DEV HDB
[4]   Personality and ethical decision-making in research: The role of perceptions of self and others [J].
Antes, Alison L. ;
Brown, Ryan P. ;
Murphy, Stephen T. ;
Waples, Ethan P. ;
Mumford, Michael D. ;
Connelly, Shane ;
Devenport, Lynn D. .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2007, 2 (04) :15-34
[5]  
AUSTIN J, 1998, ANAL VERBAL BEHAV, V15, P42
[6]   How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation [J].
Baumeister, Roy F. ;
Vohs, Kathleen D. ;
DeWall, C. Nathan ;
Zhang, Liqing .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2007, 11 (02) :167-203
[7]   METACOGNITION AND PROBLEM-SOLVING - A PROCESS-ORIENTED APPROACH [J].
BERARDICOLETTA, B ;
DOMINOWSKI, RL ;
BUYER, LS ;
RELLINGER, ER .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1995, 21 (01) :205-223
[8]   Ethics for all: Differences across scientific society codes [J].
Bullock, M ;
Panicker, S .
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2003, 9 (02) :159-170
[9]  
CHEN FW, 2003, J BUS ETHICS, V45, P291
[10]  
Chermack T.J., 2003, ADV DEV HUM RESOUR, V5, P408