Household preference revisions and decision making: The role of disconfirmation

被引:12
作者
Bohlmann, JD
Qualls, WJ
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Eli Broad Grad Sch Management, Dept Mkt & Supply Chain Management, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Coll Commerce & Business Adm, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
family decision malting; group behavior; disconfirmation;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8116(01)00043-X
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we examine the role of disconfirmation as an important determinant of household preference revisions and decision making. Although prior research has examined decision influence and information exchange in household decision making, the impact of disconfirmation on individual family member preferences and the joint household preference has not been explicitly studied. Analogous to the main types of social influence found within groups, we identify two types of disconfirmation that impact individual preferences arising from family interaction or discussion. These two types of disconfirmation are informational disconfirmation, related to new product information revealed in family discussion being different than one's prior beliefs, and preference disconfirmation, where a family member has incorrect expectations of the preferences of other influential household members. An empirical study involving a household vacation decision demonstrates significant disconfirmation effects in explaining individuals' post-discussion preferences, as well as the joint household preference and decision. Based on the empirical results, we discuss various implications and suggest future research to study the specific consequences of disconfirmation in household decisions. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 339
页数:21
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   THE ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF CUSTOMER SATISFACTION FOR FIRMS [J].
ANDERSON, EW ;
SULLIVAN, MW .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1993, 12 (02) :125-143
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, MARKET LETT, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1007904931283
[3]  
[Anonymous], GROUP PROCESSES INTE
[4]   Measuring the influence of individual preference structures in group decision making [J].
Arora, N ;
Allenby, GM .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1999, 36 (04) :476-487
[5]   PARENTAL AND TEENAGE CHILD INFLUENCES IN FAMILY DECISION-MAKING [J].
BELCH, GE ;
CERESINO, G ;
BELCH, MA .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1985, 13 (02) :163-176
[6]   A BAYESIAN MODEL OF GROUP POLARIZATION [J].
BORDLEY, RF .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1983, 32 (02) :262-274
[7]   PERSUASIVE ARGUMENTATION AND SOCIAL-COMPARISON AS DETERMINANTS OF ATTITUDE POLARIZATION [J].
BURNSTEIN, E ;
VINOKUR, A .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 13 (04) :315-332
[8]   Modeling individual preference evolution and choice in a dynamic group setting [J].
Chandrashekaran, M ;
Walker, BA ;
Ward, JC ;
Reingen, PH .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1996, 33 (02) :211-223
[9]  
Corfman K. P., 1993, HDB OPER RES MANAG S, V5, P83, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0927-0507(05)80026-X, 10.1016/S0927-0507(05)80026-X]
[10]   MODELS OF COOPERATIVE GROUP DECISION-MAKING AND RELATIVE INFLUENCE - AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF FAMILY PURCHASE DECISIONS [J].
CORFMAN, KP ;
LEHMANN, DR .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1987, 14 (01) :1-13