Development of methane emission factors for Indian paddy fields and estimation of national methane budget

被引:37
|
作者
Gupta, Prabhat K. [1 ]
Gupta, Vandana [1 ]
Sharma, C. [1 ]
Das, S. N. [2 ]
Purkait, N. [3 ]
Adhya, T. K. [4 ]
Pathak, H. [5 ]
Ramesh, R. [6 ]
Baruah, K. K. [7 ]
Venkatratnam, L. [8 ]
Singh, Gulab [9 ]
Iyer, C. S. P. [10 ]
机构
[1] Natl Phys Lab, New Delhi 110012, India
[2] Reg Res Lab, Bhubaneswar 751013, Orissa, India
[3] Kolkata Univ, Inst Radiophys & Elect, Kolkata 700009, W Bengal, India
[4] Cent Rice Res Inst, Cuttack 753006, Orissa, India
[5] India Off, Int Rice Res Inst, New Delhi 110012, India
[6] Anna Univ, Inst Ocean Management, Madras 600025, Tamil Nadu, India
[7] Tezpur Univ, Napaam 784028, Assam, India
[8] Natl Remote Sensing Agcy, Hyderabad 500037, Andhra Pradesh, India
[9] Cent Fuel Res Inst, Dhanbad 828108, Jharkhand, India
[10] Reg Res Lab, Trivandrum 695019, Kerala, India
关键词
NATCOM; Inventory; Seasonally integrated flux; Paddy water regimes; Organic amendment; RICE FIELDS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.09.042
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A state-wise assessment of methane (CH4) budget for Indian paddies, based on a decadal measurement data across India is presented for the calendar year (CY) 1994, the base year for India's Initial National Communication (NATCOM) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), along with national trend from CY 1979 to 2006. The NATCOM CH4 emission factors (EFs) for Indian paddy cultivation areas, generally having less than 0.7% of soil organic carbon (SOC), have been estimated as 17.48 +/- 4 g m(-2) for irrigated continuously flooded (IR-CF), 6.95 +/- 1.86 g m(-2) for rain-fed drought prone (RF-DP), 19 +/- 6 g m(-2) for rain-fed flood prone (RF-FP) and deep-water (DW), 6.62 +/- 1.89 g m(-2) for irrigated intermittently flooded single aeration (IR-IF-SA) and 2.01 +/- 1.49 g m(-2) for IR-IF multiple aeration (MA) paddy water regimes. The state-wise Study for 1994 has indicated national CH4 budget estimate of 4.09 +/- 1.19 Tg y(-1) and the trend from 1979 to 2006 was in the range of 3.62 +/- 1 to 4.09 +/- 1.19 Tg y(-1). Four higher emitting or "hot spot" states (West Bengal, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh) have accounted for 53.9% of total CH4 emission with RF-FP paddy water regime as the major contributor. CH4 emissions were enhanced by factors such as SOC (similar to 1.5 times due to increase in SOC by similar to 1.8 times), paddy cultivars (similar to 1.5 times), age of seedlings (similar to 1.4 times), and seasons (similar to 1.8 times in Kharif or monsoon than in Rabi or winter season). (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 598
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] METHANE BUDGET FROM PADDY FIELDS IN INDIA
    PARASHAR, DC
    MITRA, AP
    GUPTA, PK
    RAI, J
    SHARMA, RC
    SINGH, N
    KAUL, S
    LAL, G
    CHAUDHARY, A
    RAY, HS
    DAS, SN
    PARIDA, KM
    RAO, SB
    KANUNGO, SP
    RAMASAMI, T
    NAIR, BU
    SWAMY, M
    SINGH, G
    GUPTA, SK
    SINGH, AR
    SAIKIA, BK
    BARUA, AKS
    PATHAK, MG
    IYER, CSP
    GOPALAKRISHNAN, M
    SANE, PV
    SINGH, SN
    BANERJEE, R
    SETHUNATHAN, N
    ADHYA, TK
    RAI, VR
    PALIT, P
    SAHA, AK
    PURKAIT, NN
    CHATURVEDI, GS
    SEN, SP
    SEN, M
    SARKAR, B
    BANIK, A
    SUBBARAYA, BH
    LAL, S
    VENKATRAMANI, S
    SINHA, SK
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 1994, 66 (12): : 938 - 941
  • [2] Methane budget from paddy fields in India
    Parashar, DC
    Mitra, AP
    Gupta, PK
    Rai, J
    Sharma, RC
    Singh, N
    Koul, S
    Ray, HS
    Das, SN
    Parida, KM
    Rao, SB
    Kanungo, SP
    Ramasami, T
    Nair, BU
    Swamy, M
    Singh, G
    Gupta, SK
    Singh, AR
    Saikia, BK
    Barua, AKS
    Pathak, MG
    Iyer, CSP
    Gopalakrishnan, M
    Sane, PV
    Singh, SN
    Banerjee, R
    Sethunathan, N
    Adhya, TK
    Rao, VR
    Palit, P
    Saha, AK
    Purkait, NN
    Chaturvedi, GS
    Sen, SP
    Sen, M
    Sarkar, B
    Banik, A
    Subbaraya, BH
    Lal, S
    Venkatramani, S
    Lal, G
    Chaudhary, A
    Sinha, SK
    CHEMOSPHERE, 1996, 33 (04) : 737 - 757
  • [3] Mitigation of methane emission from paddy fields
    Parashar, DC
    Gadi, R
    Mitra, AP
    NON-C02 GREENHOUSE GASES: SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTANDING, CONTROL OPTIONS AND POLICY ASPECTS, 2002, : 441 - 446
  • [4] Methane emission from paddy fields in Taiwan
    S.-S. Yang
    H.-L. Chang
    Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2001, 33 : 157 - 165
  • [5] EMISSION AND PRODUCTION OF METHANE IN THE PADDY FIELDS OF JAPAN
    YAGI, K
    MINAMI, K
    JARQ-JAPAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1991, 25 (03): : 165 - 171
  • [6] Methane emission from paddy fields in Taiwan
    Yang, SS
    Chang, HL
    BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 2001, 33 (02) : 157 - 165
  • [7] Estimation of methane emission in organic paddy fields using remote sensing indexes
    Kingpaiboon, S.
    Khantotong, S.
    Mungkarndee, P.
    NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2018, 44 : S59 - S59
  • [8] Emission of Methane From Wetland Paddy Fields: A Review
    Devi, Naorem Twinkle
    Devi, Angom Sarjubala
    Singh, Khoiyangbam Raju
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE CHANGE, 2022, 8 (03) : 13 - 19
  • [9] PARAMETERS AFFECTING METHANE EMISSION FROM PADDY FIELDS
    PARASHAR, DC
    RAI, J
    GUPTA, PK
    SINGH, N
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIO & SPACE PHYSICS, 1991, 20 (01): : 12 - 17
  • [10] Effects of Rice Root Development and Rhizosphere Soil on Methane Emission in Paddy Fields
    Guan, Sheng
    Qi, Zhijuan
    Li, Sirui
    Du, Sicheng
    Xu, Dan
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2024, 13 (22):