The impact of legitimacy pressure and corporate profitability on green innovation: Evidence from China top 100

被引:459
作者
Li, Dayuan [1 ]
Zheng, Mi [1 ]
Cao, Cuicui [1 ]
Chen, Xiaohong [1 ,2 ]
Ren, Shenggang [1 ]
Huang, Min [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent S Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Resource Conserving & Envi, Sch Business, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ Commerce, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Legitimacy pressure; Corporate profitability; Green innovation; Green product innovation; Green process innovation; China; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; FIRM PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; ECO-INNOVATION; PRODUCT INNOVATION; MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; ORGANIZATION; CONNECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.123
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Green innovation is an important approach for achieving sustainable development. Most research on determinants of corporate green innovation has focused on either external or internal drivers. Combining institutional theory and resource-based view, the scientific value of this study lies in simultaneously exploring the influence of external legitimacy pressure and internal corporate profitability, and their interaction on green innovation. Samples of the top 100 listed companies in China, from 2008 to 2012, were used and the results demonstrated that legitimacy pressure from stakeholders has a significantly positive influence on both corporate green product innovation and process innovation. The results also revealed that corporate profitability positively affects green product innovation, while there was found to be no significant influence on green process innovation. Moreover, corporate profitability positively moderates the relationship between legitimacy pressure and green product innovation. The results show that not only the single factor of external legitimacy pressure and internal profitability, but also their interaction, affects corporate green innovation practices. This offers an integrating perspective on how corporations can be more innovative in sustainability. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 49
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication [J].
Aerts, Walter ;
Cormier, Denis .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2009, 34 (01) :1-27
[2]   A comprehensive literature review on, and the construction of a framework for, environmental legitimacy, accountability and proactivity [J].
Alrazi, Bakhtiar ;
de Villiers, Char ;
van Staden, Chris J. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 102 :44-57
[3]   Green corporate image: moderating the connection between environmental product innovation and firm performance [J].
Amores-Salvado, Javier ;
Martin-de Castro, Gregorio ;
Navas-Lopez, Jose E. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 83 :356-365
[4]  
[Anonymous], ADV STRAT M
[5]   Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment [J].
Bansal, P ;
Clelland, I .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 47 (01) :93-103
[6]   Necessity as the mother of "green' inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations [J].
Berrone, Pascual ;
Fosfuri, Andrea ;
Gelabert, Liliana ;
Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (08) :891-909
[7]   The impact of green initiatives on environmental legitimacy and admiration of the organization [J].
Bortree, Denise Sevick .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2009, 35 (02) :133-135
[8]   Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries [J].
Brunnermeier, SB ;
Cohen, MA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 45 (02) :278-293
[9]   Does the development of environmental innovation require different resources? Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms [J].
Cainelli, Giulio ;
De Marchi, Valentina ;
Grandinetti, Roberto .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 94 :211-220
[10]   Comparative statics of a monopolistic firm facing price-cap and command-and-control environmental regulations [J].
Caputo, Michael R. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2014, 46 :464-471