The association of Incontinence Symptom Index scores with urethral function and support

被引:2
|
作者
Lewicky-Gaupp, Christina [1 ]
Wei, John T. [2 ]
DeLancey, John O. L. [1 ]
Fenner, Dee E. [1 ]
McGuire, Edward J. [2 ]
Morgan, Daniel M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Pelv Floor Res Grp,Div Gynecol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Incontinence Symptom Index; stress urinary incontinence; symptom severity;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.027
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to establish categories of symptom severity based on Incontinence Symptom Index (ISI) scores and to show how these categories are associated with urethral function and support. STUDY DESIGN: Women with stress incontinence (n = 97) and asymptomatic controls (n = 98) completed the ISI. Asymptomatic women's scores were between 0 and 6; this range was designated as absent/mild (n = 104). The median score for symptomatic women was 16; scores from 7 to 16 (n = 50) were designated as moderate, and scores of 17 or greater (n = 40) were designated as severe. RESULTS: Urethral function differed in women with mild, moderate, and severe scores: Valsalva leak point pressure (162.3 vs 123.5 vs 101.9 cm H2O; P = .001), cough leak point pressure (202.0 vs 163.0 vs 134.3 cm H2O; P = .001), and maximum urethral closure pressure (69.1 vs 44.1 vs 35.3 cm H2O; P = .001). Loss of urethrovesical support (point Aa: -1.0 vs -0.6 vs -0.5 cm; P = .004) was found in women with moderate and severe symptoms, compared with those with mild symptoms. CONCLUSION: Categories of symptom severity assessed by the ISI are associated with urethral function and support.
引用
收藏
页码:680.e1 / 680.e5
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Association of reflux symptom index scores with gastroesophageal flap valve status
    Kaplan, Mustafa
    Tanoglu, Alpaslan
    Erkul, Evren
    Kara, Muammer
    Yazgan, Yusuf
    AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2014, 41 (06) : 543 - 547
  • [2] Urinary incontinence symptom scores and Urodynamic diagnoses
    FitzGerald, MP
    Brubaker, L
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2002, 21 (01) : 30 - 35
  • [3] Development of a symptom severity index and a symptom impact index for stress incontinence in women
    Black, N
    Griffiths, J
    Pope, C
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 1996, 15 (06) : 630 - 640
  • [4] Performance of the American Urological Association Symptom Index With and Without an Additional Urge Incontinence Item
    Barry, Michael J.
    Avins, Andrew L.
    Meleth, Sreelatha
    UROLOGY, 2011, 78 (03) : 550 - 554
  • [5] The Incontinence Symptom Index (ISI): A novel and practical symptom score for the evaluation of urinary incontinence severity
    Wei, JT
    Dunn, RL
    Hoag, L
    Faerber, G
    Dorr, R
    McGuire, EJ
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04): : 33 - 33
  • [6] Stress urinary incontinence: Relative importance of urethral support and urethral closure pressure
    DeLancey, John O. L.
    Trowbridge, Elisa R.
    Miller, Janis M.
    Morgan, Daniel M.
    Guire, Kenneth
    Fenner, Dee E.
    Weadock, William J.
    Ashton-Miller, James A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (06): : 2286 - 2290
  • [7] SYMPTOM RESOLUTION AND RECURRENT STRESS INCONTINENCE FOLLOWING URETHRAL SLING REMOVAL
    Bergersen, Andrew
    Price, Elinora
    Callegari, Michael
    Austin, Evan
    Oduyemi, Odutoyosi
    Funk, Joel
    Twiss, Christian
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2018, 37 : S623 - S623
  • [8] Re: Stress Urinary Incontinence: Relative Importance of Urethral Support and Urethral Closure Pressure
    Golomb, Jacob
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (03): : 1507 - 1507
  • [9] Stress urinary incontinence: Relative importance of urethral support and urethral closure pressure - Comment
    Smith, Ariana L.
    Raz, Shlomo
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (06): : 2290 - 2290
  • [10] Urinary incontinence diagnoses and their impact on quality of life symptom scores in women
    Haessler, A. L.
    Hguyen, J. N.
    Bhatia, N. N.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2007, 18 : S99 - S100