Clinical Utility of a Novel Coronary Heart Disease Risk-Assessment Test to Further Classify Intermediate-Risk Patients

被引:4
|
作者
Solomon, Matthew D. [1 ]
Tirupsur, Ahalya [2 ]
Hytopoulos, Evangelos [2 ]
Beggs, Michael [3 ]
Harrington, Douglas S. [4 ,5 ]
French, Cynthia [3 ]
Quertermous, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Aviir Diagnost Labs, Dept Biostat, Irvine, CA USA
[3] Aviir Diagnost Labs, Dept Prod Dev, Irvine, CA USA
[4] Aviir Diagnost Labs, Clin Lab, Irvine, CA USA
[5] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; US ADULTS; PREVENTION; REDUCTION; HEALTH; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/clc.22185
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundCurrent coronary heart disease (CHD) risk assessments inadequately assess intermediate-risk patients, leaving many undertreated and vulnerable to heart attacks. A novel CHD risk-assessment (CHDRA) tool was developed for intermediate-risk stratification using biomarkers and established risk factors to significantly improve CHD risk discrimination. HypothesisPhysicians will change their treatment plan in response to more information about a patient's CHD risk level provided by the CHDRA test. MethodsA Web-based survey of cardiology, internal medicine, family practice, and obstetrics/gynecology physicians (n=206) was conducted to assess the CHDRA clinical impact. Each physician was shown 3 clinical vignettes representing community-based cohort participants randomly selected from 8 total vignettes. For each, the physicians assessed the individual's CHD risk and selected preferred therapies based on the individual's comorbidities, physical examination, and laboratory results. The individual's CHDRA score was then provided and the physicians were queried for changes to their initial treatment plans. ResultsAfter obtaining the CHDRA result, 70% of the physician responses indicated a change to the patient's treatment plan. The revised lipid-management plans agreed more often (74.6% of the time) with the current Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines than did the original plans (57.6% of the time). Most physicians (71.3%) agreed with the statement that the CHDRA result provided information that would impact their current treatment decisions. ConclusionsThe CHDRA test provided additional information to which physicians responded by more often applying appropriate therapy and actions aligned with guidelines, thus demonstrating the clinical utility of the test.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 627
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Novel Risk Markers for Improvement in Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Intermediate-Risk Individuals
    Yeboah, Joseph
    McClelland, Robyn L.
    Polonsky, Tamar S.
    Burke, Gregory L.
    Sibley, Christopher T.
    O'Leary, Daniel
    Carr, Jeffery J.
    Goff, David C., Jr.
    Greenland, Philip
    Herrington, David M.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 308 (08): : 788 - 795
  • [2] REVIEW OF SERUM-LIPIDS AND APOLIPOPROTEINS IN RISK-ASSESSMENT OF CORONARY HEART-DISEASE
    RIFAI, N
    CHAPMAN, JF
    SILVERMAN, LM
    GWYNNES, JT
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY SCIENCE, 1988, 18 (06): : 429 - 439
  • [3] Coronary Artery Calcium Test for Heart Disease Risk Assessment
    Greenland, Philip
    Lloyd-Jones, Donald M.
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 7 (10) : 1083 - 1083
  • [4] Clinical Utility of Oncoguard Liver Test to Further Classify Indeterminate Liver Lesions in a High Risk Cirrhotic Population at Risk for HCC
    Maheshwari, R.
    Stein, L.
    Miller, E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 23 (06) : S732 - S732
  • [5] CORONARY HEART DISEASE RISK ASSESSMENT in Asymptomatic Patients
    Patricio, Jose P.
    Fernandes, Helder
    Oliveira, Patricia
    Oliveira, Ana
    Faria, Maria Teresa
    Perez, Maria Berta
    Martins, Elisabete
    Pereira, Jorge Goncalves
    ACTA MEDICA PORTUGUESA, 2009, 22 (03): : 257 - 260
  • [6] Novel cardiovascular risk-assessment metrics and absolute risk assessment: future role in clinical practice?
    Kalhan, Atul
    Rees, Alan
    CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY, 2014, 25 (04) : 321 - 323
  • [7] Clinical utility of a Web-enabled risk-assessment and clinical decision support program
    Orlando, Lori A.
    Wu, R. Ryanne
    Myers, Rachel A.
    Buchanan, Adam H.
    Henrich, Vincent C.
    Hauser, Elizabeth R.
    Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 18 (10) : 1020 - 1028
  • [8] Valvular disease TAVI noninferior to surgery in intermediate-risk patients
    Lim, Gregory B.
    NATURE REVIEWS CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 14 (05) : 7 - 7
  • [9] Fine-tuning the risk assessment and treatment of patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism
    Robert-Ebadi, Helia
    LANCET HAEMATOLOGY, 2021, 8 (09): : E614 - E615
  • [10] Clinical applications of risk-assessment protocols in the management of individual patients
    Nugent, WC
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1997, 64 (06): : S68 - S72