A prospective evaluation of the safety and efficacy of methohexital in the emergency department

被引:14
|
作者
Lerman, B
Yoshida, D
Levitt, MA
机构
[1] Department of Emergency Medicine, Alameda County Medical Center, Highland Campus, Oakland, CA
[2] Department of Emergency Services, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA
[3] Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA
[4] Department of Emergency Medicine, Alameda County Medical Center, Highland Campus, Oakland, CA 94602
来源
关键词
sedation; emergency department; methohexital;
D O I
10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90047-9
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
A prospective observational study in an inner city teaching hospital was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous methohexital (MTX) in the emergency department (ED). Pulse oximetry, vital signs and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores were recorded serially for 30 minutes after the administration of MTX to 76 adult patients. Liked scales of 1 to 5 were used to record the physician's assessment of the adequacy of sedation and the patient's assessments of recall and pain of the procedure, Patients received an average of 88 +/- 21 mg of MTX for a variety of indications (orthopedic procedures, 78%; sedation for other procedures, 14%; intubation, 5%; and psychiatric interview, 3%). No patient had clinically significant changes in heart rate or blood pressure. Eight (10.5%) had apnea, although only one patient had oxygen saturations of less than 90%. Each episode was brief and easily managed with bag-valve-mask ventilation. Risk factors for apnea included a history of alcoholism (P =.0003) and recent recreational narcotic use (P =.0139). Patients were maximally sedated in an average of 37 +/- 42 seconds. In the subset of initially alert patients, GCS scores decreased from 15 at baseline to 5.9 +/- 4.5. The physician's assessment of the adequacy of sedation was excellent (4.7 +/- 0.7). Patients reported little recall (1.3 +/- 0.9) or pain (1.3 +/- 0.8). It was concluded that MTX caused clinically insignificant changes in hemodynamics or oxygenation, although respiratory depression did occur; significant respiratory depression was brief and easily managed. MTX provided rapid and excellent levels of sedation with little or no patient recall or pain. Copyright (C) 1996 by W.B. Saunders Company.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 354
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF METHOHEXITAL IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    ZINK, BJ
    DARFLER, K
    SALLUZZO, RF
    REILLY, KM
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1991, 20 (12) : 1293 - 1298
  • [2] Safety and effectiveness of methohexital for procedural sedation in the emergency department
    Austin, T
    Vilke, GM
    Nyheim, E
    Kelly, D
    Chan, TC
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 24 (03): : 315 - 318
  • [3] Methohexital for procedural sedation of cardioversions in the emergency department
    Bauer, Jacob
    Beauchamp, Lauren
    Pavich, Emily
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 58 : 79 - 83
  • [4] AMINOPHYLLINE IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT - MAXIMIZING SAFETY AND EFFICACY
    KINO, R
    DAY, RO
    PEARCE, GA
    FULDE, GWO
    CHEST, 1991, 100 (06) : 1572 - 1577
  • [5] Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction of propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department: a prospective study
    Zed, Peter J.
    Abu-Laban, Riyad B.
    Chan, Winnie W. Y.
    Harrison, David W.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 9 (06) : 421 - 427
  • [6] PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT MEDICAL CLEARANCE
    HENNEMAN, PL
    MENDOZA, R
    LEWIS, RJ
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1994, 24 (04) : 672 - 677
  • [7] SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF MILK AND MOLASSES ENEMAS IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    Vilke, Gary M.
    DeMers, Gerard
    Patel, Nilang
    Castillo, Edward M.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 48 (06): : 667 - 670
  • [8] Safety and Efficacy of Antihypertensive Prescription at Emergency Department Discharge
    Brody, Aaron
    Rahman, Tahsin
    Reed, Brian
    Millis, Scott
    Ference, Brian
    Flack, John M.
    Levy, Phillip D.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (05) : 632 - 635
  • [9] A Safety Comparison of Single-Agent Methohexital, Ketamine, or Propofol for Musculoskeletal Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department
    Kruggel, Spencer
    Mishler, Aimee
    Sullivan, Louisa
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 63 (02): : 290 - 294
  • [10] Intranasal ketamine for acute traumatic pain in the Emergency Department: a prospective, randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety
    Shachar Shimonovich
    Roy Gigi
    Amir Shapira
    Tal Sarig-Meth
    Danielle Nadav
    Mattan Rozenek
    Debra West
    Pinchas Halpern
    BMC Emergency Medicine, 16 (1)