Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for discovering peptide binding motifs

被引:0
|
作者
Rajapakse, Menaka
Schmidt, Bertil
Brusic, Vladimir
机构
[1] Inst Infocomm Res, Singapore 119613, Singapore
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Comp Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[3] Univ Queensland, Australian Ctr Plant Funct Genom, Sch Land & Food Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Inst Mol Biosci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEA) use Genetic Algorithms (GA) to find a set of potential solutions, which are reached by compromising trade-offs between the multiple objectives. This paper presents a novel approach using MOEA to search for a motif which can unravel rules governing peptide binding to medically important receptors with applications to drugs and vaccines target discovery. However, the degeneracy of motifs due to the varying physicochemical properties at the binding sites across large number of active peptides poses a challenge for the detection of motifs of specific molecules such as MHC Class II molecule I-A(g7) of the non-obese diabetic (NOD) mouse. Several motifs have been experimentally derived for I-A(g7) molecule, but they differ from each other significantly. We have formulated the problem of finding a consensus motif for I-A(g7) by using MOEA as an outcome that satisfies two objectives: extract prior information by minimizing the distance between the experimentally derived motifs and the resulting matrix by MOEA; minimize the overall number of false positives and negatives resulting by using the putative MOEA-derived motif. The MOEA results in a Pareto optimal set of motifs from which the best motif is chosen by the Area under the Receiver Operator Characteristics (A(ROC)) performance on an independent test dataset. We compared the MOEA-derived motif with the experimentally derived motifs and motifs derived by computational techniques such as MEME, RANKPEP, and Gibbs Motif Sampler. The overall predictive performance of the MOEA derived motif is comparable or better than the experimentally derived motifs and is better than the computationally derived motifs.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 158
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hyper multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimization problems
    Guo, Weian
    Chen, Ming
    Wang, Lei
    Wu, Qidi
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 21 (20) : 5883 - 5891
  • [2] Expensive Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm with Multi-Objective Data Generation
    Li J.-Y.
    Zhan Z.-H.
    Jisuanji Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Computers, 2023, 46 (05): : 896 - 908
  • [3] Multi-objective concordance evolutionary algorithm
    Cui, Xun-Xue
    Li, Miao
    Fang, Ting-Jian
    Jisuanji Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Computers, 2001, 24 (09): : 979 - 984
  • [4] Hyper multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimization problems
    Weian Guo
    Ming Chen
    Lei Wang
    Qidi Wu
    Soft Computing, 2017, 21 : 5883 - 5891
  • [5] A novel multi-objective evolutionary algorithm
    Zheng, Bojin
    Hu, Ting
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE - ICCS 2007, PT 4, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4490 : 1029 - +
  • [6] A coevolutionary multi-objective evolutionary algorithm
    Coello, CAC
    Sierra, MR
    CEC: 2003 CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 482 - 489
  • [7] Evolutionary Multi-Objective Membrane Algorithm
    Liu, Chuang
    Du, Yingkui
    Li, Ao
    Lei, Jiahao
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 6020 - 6031
  • [8] Discovering generalized design knowledge using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with generalization operators
    Bang, Hyunseung
    Selva, Daniel
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2020, 143
  • [9] Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with prediction in the objective space
    Guerrero-Pena, Elaine
    Ribeiro Araujo, Aluizio Fausto
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 501 : 293 - 316
  • [10] A Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm based on Decomposition for Constrained Multi-objective Optimization
    Martinez, Saul Zapotecas
    Coello, Carlos A. Coello
    2014 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2014, : 429 - 436