Temporomandibular joint bony ankylosis: Comparison of treatment with transport distraction osteogenesis or the Matthews Device arthroplasty

被引:23
|
作者
Gabbay, Joubin S.
Heller, Justin B.
Song, Yun Y.
Wasson, Kristy L.
Harrington, Heidi
Bradley, James P.
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00001665-200605000-00022
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) bony ankylosis with micrognathia is a rare congenital condition that is difficult to treat and may result in recurrence. In a series of affected patients, we compared two new methods of treatment: transport distraction osteogenesis and Matthews Device arthroplasty. All patients had computed tomography scan documented bilateral TMJ bony ankylosis. Group I (transport distraction osteogenesis) underwent distraction advancement of the mandible (for micrognathia) followed by resection of the condyles, recontouring of the glenoid fossas with interposition temporoparietal-fascial flaps, and transport distraction osteogenesis of mandibular rami segments. Group II (Matthews Device arthroplasty) underwent all of the above procedures except for transport distraction osteogenesis. Instead, the Matthews Devices were anchored to the temporal bone and mandibular rami. Hinged arms allowed for motion at the reconstructed TMJ. In both groups, patients underwent extensive postoperative therapy. Preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up lateral cephalograms were obtained, and incisor opening distances were recorded. All patients but one had severe micrognathia (n = 9). For group I (transport distraction osteogenesis), mean age was 6.8 years. and mean advancement was 28.5 mm. For group II (Matthews Device arthroplasty) mean age was 8.2 years, and mean advancement was 23.5 mm. In group I (transport distraction osteogenesis), mean incisor opening was 1 mm preoperatively and 27.5 mm postoperatively; however, it relapsed to 14.3 mm by 12.5 months follow-up (48% relapse). Mean incisor opening in group II (Matthews Device arthroplasty) was 3.9 nun preoperatively and 33.4 mm postoperatively and remained at 30.6 mm after 11.1 months follow-up (8% relapse). One patient in group I (transport distraction osteogenesis) underwent surgical revision because of relapse. Our data showed that for congenital TMJ bony ankylosis both transport distraction osteogenesis and Matthews Device arthroplasty techniques were successful initially; however, the Matthews Device arthroplasty avoided long-term relapse.
引用
收藏
页码:516 / 522
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gap arthroplasty combined with distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of unilateral ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint and micrognathia
    Yu, Hongbo
    Shen, Guofang
    Zhang, Shilei
    Wang, Xudong
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 47 (03): : 200 - 204
  • [2] Efficacy of temporomandibular joint arthroplasty and insertion of a Matthews device as treatment for ankylosis of the joint: a case series
    Kelly, M.
    Bowen, A.
    Murray, D. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 59 (10): : 1113 - 1119
  • [3] Evaluating the remodeling of condyles reconstructed by transport distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis
    Xia, Long
    Zhang, Yi
    An, Jingang
    Chen, Shuo
    He, Yang
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 48 (05) : 494 - 500
  • [4] Transport distraction osteogenesis combined with orthodontic treatment in a patient with unilateral temporomandibular joint ankylosis
    Jung, Seo-Yeon
    Park, Jung-Hyun
    Park, Hyung-Sik
    Baik, Hyoung-Seon
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 151 (02) : 372 - 383
  • [5] Simultaneous arthroplasty and distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint and secondary mandibular deformities in children
    Ma, Yuxin
    Huang, Yuanjin
    Zhu, Songsong
    Li, Yunfeng
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 57 (02): : 135 - 139
  • [6] The sequential treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis with secondary deformities by distraction osteogenesis and arthroplasty or TMJ reconstruction
    Zhang, W.
    Yang, X.
    Zhang, Y.
    Zhao, T.
    Jia, J.
    Chang, S.
    Liu, Y.
    Yu, Bo
    Chen, Y.
    Ma, Q.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 47 (08) : 1052 - 1059
  • [7] Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis in facial asymmetry patients with unilateral temporomandibular joint bony ankylosis
    Yoon, HJ
    Kim, HG
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 31 (05) : 544 - 548
  • [8] Application of Bidirectional Distraction Osteogenesis for the Treatment of Mandibular Micriognathia Caused by Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis
    Zhang, Chi
    Li, Yunfeng
    Ye, Bin
    Liu, Yao
    Bao, Chongyun
    Zhu, Songsong
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 28 (06) : 1502 - 1507
  • [9] COMPARISON OF GAP AND INTERPOSITION ARTHROPLASTY IN TREATMENT OF TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT ANKYLOSIS
    TOPAZIAN, RG
    JOURNAL OF ORAL SURGERY, 1966, 24 (05): : 405 - +
  • [10] Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis Following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis: A Dreadful Complication
    Schlund, M.
    Touzet-Roumazeille, S.
    Nicot, R.
    Ferri, J.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 31 (01) : 222 - 225