Letter from Ralph J Cicerone regarding Edward Calabrese's paper published online first on August 4th: "how the US national academy of sciences misled the world community on cancer risk assessment: new findings challenge historical foundations of the linear dose response." [DOI 10.1007/s00204-013-1105-6, Review Article]

被引：10

作者：

Cicerone, R. J. ^{[1
]}

Crowley, K. D. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] US Natl Acad Sci, Natl Res Council, Washington, DC 20001 USA

[2] US Natl Acad Sci, Natl Res Council, Nucl & Radiat Studies Board, Washington, DC 20001 USA

来源：

ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY | 2014年 / 88卷 / 01期

关键词：

Cancer Risk Assessment; World Community; Historical Foundation; Linearity Agenda; Linear Dose Response;

D O I：

10.1007/s00204-013-1176-4

中图分类号：

R99 [毒物学（毒理学）];

学科分类号：

100405 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：171 / 172

页数：2

共 7 条

[1] Letter from Ralph J Cicerone regarding Edward Calabrese’s paper published online first on August 4th: “how the US national academy of sciences misled the world community on cancer risk assessment: new findings challenge historical foundations of the linear dose response.” [DOI 10.1007/s00204-013-1105-6, Review Article]
R. J. Cicerone
K. D. Crowley
Archives of Toxicology, 2014, 88 : 171 - 172
[2] Response to Letter of Ralph J Cicerone and Kevin Crowley regarding "How the US National Academy of Sciences misled the world community on cancer risk assessment: new findings challenge historical foundations of the linear dose response." [DOI 10.1007/s00204-013-1105-6, Review Article]
Calabrese, Edward J.
ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 2014, 88 (01) : 173 - 177
[3] Response to Letter of Ralph J Cicerone and Kevin Crowley regarding “How the US National Academy of Sciences misled the world community on cancer risk assessment: new findings challenge historical foundations of the linear dose response.” [DOI 10.1007/s00204-013-1105-6, Review Article]
Edward J. Calabrese
Archives of Toxicology, 2014, 88 : 173 - 177
[4] How the US National Academy of Sciences misled the world community on cancer risk assessment: new findings challenge historical foundations of the linear dose response
Edward J. Calabrese
Archives of Toxicology, 2013, 87 : 2063 - 2081
[5] How the US National Academy of Sciences misled the world community on cancer risk assessment: new findings challenge historical foundations of the linear dose response
Calabrese, Edward J.
ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 2013, 87 (12) : 2063 - 2081
[6] Adoption of linear no-threshold model violated basic scientific principles and was harmfulLetter from Mohan Doss regarding Edward Calabrese’s paper “How the US National Academy of Sciences misled the world community on cancer risk assessment: new findings challenge historical foundations of the linear dose response” (Arch Toxicol (2013) 87:2063–2081) and the Letter from Ralph J Cicerone (Arch Toxicol (2014) 88:171–172)
Mohan Doss
Archives of Toxicology, 2014, 88 (3) : 849 - 852
[7] Leukemia incidence of 96,000 Hiroshima atomic bomb survivors is compelling evidence that the LNT model is wrongEdward Calabrese’s papers “Origin of the linear no threshold (LNT) dose-response concept” (Arch Toxicol (2013) 87:1621–1633) and “How the US National Academy of Sciences misled the world community on cancer risk assessment: new findings challenge historical foundations of the linear dose response” (Arch Toxicol (2013) 87:2063–2081)
Jerry M. Cuttler
Archives of Toxicology, 2014, 88 (3) : 847 - 848

← 1 →