Feedback Stabilization of a Reduced-Order Model of a Jet in Crossflow

被引:5
|
作者
Alvergue, Luis [1 ]
Babaee, Hessam [2 ]
Gu, Guoxiang [1 ]
Acharya, Sumanta [2 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Div Elect & Comp Engn, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
STABILITY; POD; IDENTIFICATION; DISTURBANCES; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.2514/1.J053295
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Airfoils in gas turbine engines used for aeropropulsion are actively cooled by film cooling; and, to cost-effectively optimize or control the film-cooling behavior, reduced-order models combined with a suitable control strategy are needed. Motivated by this film-cooling application, a linear state feedback controller for stabilization of a proper orthogonal decomposition-based reduced-order model of a film-cooling jet injected over the airfoil surface into a hot crossflow is presented. A full-order direct numerical simulation of the jet in crossflow is used to generate the data required to build the reduced-order model. The control objective is to prevent the mixing of the coolant jet and hot gases from the combustor so that the coolant remains close to the blade surface. The kinetic energy of the turbulent flow is used as a measure of mixing, which in turn is used to guide the design of a desired steady-state condition with low kinetic energy. The linear controller guarantees that the nonlinear reduced-order model will be driven to the desired steady state if the system is operating inside a region of quadratic attraction. The controller gain and region of quadratic attraction are easily calculated by solving a set of linear matrix inequalities. In addition, the suggestion is made to utilize a switching strategy to deal with the case in which the state of the reduced-order model is outside of the calculated region of quadratic attraction. Results show that in closed-loop, the reduced-order model is completely stabilized, whereas the direct numerical simulation is only stabilized for a period of time.
引用
收藏
页码:2472 / 2481
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Feedback stabilization of an oscillating vertical cylinder by POD Reduced-Order Model
    Tissot, Gilles
    Cordier, Laurent
    Noack, Bernd R.
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICAL MODELING IN PHYSICAL SCIENCES (IC-MSQUARE 2014), 2015, 574
  • [2] Reduced-order models for feedback stabilization of linear systems with a singular perturbation model
    Cao, LY
    Schwartz, HM
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2005, 7 (03) : 326 - 336
  • [3] STABILIZATION BY REDUCED-ORDER CONTROLLERS
    SMITH, MC
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1991, 36 (01) : 120 - 120
  • [4] Robust reduced-order output feedback stabilization for uncertain switched systems
    Zhou, Jianping
    Park, Ju H.
    JOURNAL OF THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE-ENGINEERING AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2015, 352 (11): : 5249 - 5268
  • [5] Reduced-order model for efficient simulation of synthetic jet actuators
    Yamaleev, N.K.
    Carpenter, M.H.
    Ferguson, Frederick
    AIAA Journal, 2005, 43 (02): : 357 - 369
  • [6] Reduced-order model for efficient simulation of synthetic jet actuators
    Yamaleev, NK
    Carpenter, MH
    Ferguson, F
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2005, 43 (02) : 357 - 369
  • [7] Feedback Stabilization of Fluids Using Reduced-Order Models for Control and Compensator Design
    Borggaard, Jeff
    Gugercin, Serkan
    Zietsman, Lizette
    2016 IEEE 55TH CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2016, : 7579 - 7585
  • [8] Validation of a reduced-order jet model for subsonic and underexpanded hydrogen jets
    Li, Xuefang
    Hecht, Ethan S.
    Christopher, David M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2016, 41 (02) : 1348 - 1358
  • [9] Evolve Filter Stabilization Reduced-Order Model for Stochastic Burgers Equation
    Xie, Xuping
    Bao, Feng
    Webster, Clayton G.
    FLUIDS, 2018, 3 (04)
  • [10] Output feedback stabilization via reduced-order observer for uncertain switched nonlinear systems
    Li, Zhanjie
    Zhao, Jun
    2017 CHINESE AUTOMATION CONGRESS (CAC), 2017, : 179 - 183