Evaluation of biometric system performance in the context of Common Criteria

被引:4
|
作者
Fernandez-Saavedra, Belen [1 ]
Sanchez-Reillo, Raul [2 ]
Liu-Jimenez, Judith [2 ]
Miguel-Hurtado, Oscar [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Carlos III Madrid, IDTetingLab, Madrid 28919, Spain
[2] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Univ Grp Identificat Technol, Dept Elect Technol, Madrid 28911, Spain
[3] Inst Cientif Innovac & Tecnol Aplicadas INCITA, R&D Dept, Madrid 28037, Spain
关键词
Biometrics; Security evaluation; Common Criteria (CC); Common Evaluation Methodology (CEM); Biometric performance testing; Vulnerability; SECURITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2013.05.022
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Nowadays, many Information Technology (IT) systems and applications are assessed by licensed laboratories in order to guarantee that these products fulfil a predefined set of security specifications. These evaluations are carried out in accordance with international Common Criteria (CC) for IT Security Evaluation and its Common Evaluation Methodology (CEM), with the objective of obtaining a certificate which will be recognised in several countries. Nevertheless, CC does not go into detail of each of the special characteristics for most of the IT technologies. Therefore specific guidelines must be developed to help testing organisations to understand how to apply CEM to each kind of product, especially when the security properties to be analysed are different from other previously-defined technologies. This is currently the case for biometrics. In this paper, the authors define how CEM is to be interpreted in the context of biometrics, and the correct way to apply it for testing biometric system performance. Biometric technical performance is one of the most important security parameters to be analysed in the case of biometrics, because it not only quantifies the capability to correctly identify individuals, but also measures the probability of countering impersonation and disguise threats. These guidelines have been developed by considering the most recent version of the CC standard and ISO/IEC 19795 multipart standard, which establish the principles for the evaluation of biometric performance. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 254
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance Evaluation of a Biometric System Based on Acoustic Images
    Izquierdo-Fuente, Alberto
    del Val, Lara
    Jimenez, Maria I.
    Villacorta, Juan J.
    SENSORS, 2011, 11 (10) : 9499 - 9519
  • [2] NMR SYSTEM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA
    NELSON, TR
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1985, 12 (04) : 511 - 511
  • [3] University journals in the context of evaluation criteria for scientific performance in Spain
    Ruiz-Perez, Rafael
    Martin-Martin, Alberto
    Delgado Lopez-Cozar, Emilio
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DOCUMENTACION CIENTIFICA, 2015, 38 (02):
  • [4] Performance evaluation of iris region detection and localization for biometric identification system
    Htwe, Chit Su
    Htay, Win
    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2011, 75 : 229 - 232
  • [5] Performance evaluation of iris region detection and localization for biometric identification system
    Htwe, Chit Su
    Htay, Win
    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2011, 51 : 229 - 232
  • [6] Generate context metadata based on biometric system
    Azzini, A
    Ceravolo, P
    Damiani, E
    Fugazza, C
    Reale, S
    Torregiani, M
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED INTELLIGENT INFORMATION AND ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, PT 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3681 : 119 - 126
  • [7] Survey of common criteria evaluation
    State Key Laboratory of Information Security, Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China
    不详
    Jisuanji Gongcheng, 2006, 1 (171-173):
  • [8] Open-Ended Design and Performance Evaluation of a Biometric Speaker Identification System
    Ramachandran, Ravi P.
    Polikar, Robi
    Dahm, Kevin D.
    Shetty, Sachin S.
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (ISCAS 2012), 2012, : 2697 - 2700
  • [9] Biometric iris recognition system evaluation
    Latman, Neal S.
    Herb, Emily
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2010, 24
  • [10] Criteria for performance evaluation
    Weiss, David J.
    Brennan, Kristin
    Thomas, Rick
    Kirlik, Alex
    Miller, Sarah M.
    JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2009, 4 (02): : 164 - 174