Assessment of Alternative Segregation Test Methods for Self-Consolidating Heavyweight Concrete

被引:4
|
作者
Gokce, H. Suleyman [1 ]
Aksan, Umut [2 ]
Andic-Cakir, Ozge [3 ]
机构
[1] Bayburt Univ, Engn Fac, Dept Civil Engn, TR-69100 Bayburt, Turkey
[2] BATICIM Batt Anadolu Cement Ind Inc, Prod Dept, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[3] Ege Univ, Engn Fac, Dept Civil Engn, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Self-consolidating heavyweight concrete; Column test; Density variation method; 3-compartment sieve test; Visual stability index; ATTENUATION COEFFICIENTS; COMPACTING CONCRETE; DYNAMIC STABILITY; FLY-ASH; FLUIDITY; RAY; RESISTANCE; VIBRATION; AGGREGATE;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002946
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This investigation is focused on the use of alternative segregation test methods on high-performance self-consolidating heavyweight concrete. Many segregation test methods have been developed by researchers up to now; however, the disadvantages of these methods, such as being time-consuming, the requirement of excessive labor, and the lack of precision, cannot ensure their worldwide prevalence. In the study, the segregation limitations stated in various test methods, that is, the column test, density variation method, and 3-compartment sieve test, were evaluated on self-consolidating heavyweight concrete produced with barite aggregate. For this purpose, in total, eight self-consolidating heavyweight concrete mixtures designed in two water/binder ratios were prepared by replacing viscosity modifier, silica fume, and fly ash with ordinary Portland cement in different amounts. The mixtures were constituted in satisfactory segregation grades, allowing researchers to evaluate the relationship between those methods. The segregation coefficient limits of the column test, density variation method, and 3-compartment sieve test are recommended as 7%, 1%, and 6.3% for the self-consolidating heavyweight concrete mixtures tested in the study.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of Stability Test Methods for Self-Consolidating Concrete
    Keske, Samuel D.
    Schindler, Anton K.
    Barnes, Robert W.
    ACI MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2013, 110 (04) : 385 - 393
  • [2] Assessment of stability test methods for self-consolidating concrete
    1600, American Concrete Institute (110):
  • [3] Repeatability of Workability Test Methods of Self-Consolidating Concrete
    Long, WuJian
    Khayat, Kemal Henri
    Xing, Feng
    ADVANCES IN BUILDING MATERIALS, PTS 1-3, 2011, 168-170 : 1981 - +
  • [4] Comparison of workability test methods for self-consolidating concrete
    Koehler E.P.
    Fowler D.W.
    Journal of ASTM International, 2010, 7 (02):
  • [5] Influence of segregation on the permeability of self-consolidating concrete
    Han, Jianguo
    Yan, Peiyu
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2021, 269
  • [6] Modeling Dynamic Segregation of Self-Consolidating Concrete
    Shen, Lin
    Struble, Leslie
    Lange, David
    ACI MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2009, 106 (04) : 375 - 380
  • [7] Testing dynamic segregation of self-consolidating concrete
    Shen, Lin
    Jovein, Hamed Bahrami
    Sun, Zhihui
    Wang, Qian
    Li, Wenmei
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2015, 75 : 465 - 471
  • [8] Modeling Static Segregation of Self-Consolidating Concrete
    Shen, Lin
    Struble, Leslie
    Lange, David
    ACI MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2009, 106 (04) : 367 - 374
  • [9] Correlating dynamic segregation of self-consolidating concrete to the slump-flow test
    Tregger, Nathan
    Gregori, Amedeo
    Ferrara, Liberato
    Shah, Surendra
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2012, 28 (01) : 499 - 505
  • [10] ASTM puts self-consolidating concrete to the test
    Vachon, Martin
    2002, American Society for Testing and Materials (30):