Injured Athletes' Rehabilitation Beliefs and Subjective Well-Being: The Contribution of Hope and Social Support

被引:57
|
作者
Lu, Frank J. H. [1 ]
Hsu, Yawen [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Sport Univ, Grad Inst Phys Educ, Tao Yuan 333, Taiwan
关键词
athletic injuries; psychology; return to play; SPORT INJURY; STRESS; SATISFACTION; ADJUSTMENT;
D O I
10.4085/1062-6050-48.1.03
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Context: Injuries are a significant problem in the world of sports. Hope and social support are very important features in providing psychological help as people face life challenges such as sport injuries. Objective: To examine how hope and social support uniquely and jointly predict postinjury rehabilitation beliefs, rehabilitation behavior, and subjective well-being. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Four sports-injury rehabilitation centers of local universities in Taiwan. Participants: A total of 224 injured Taiwanese collegiate student-athletes. Main Outcomes Measure(s): The Trait Hope Scale, the Sports Injury Rehabilitation Beliefs Survey, the Satisfaction with Life Scale, the Positive Affective and Negative Affective Scale, and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support were completed by participants after they received their regular rehabilitation treatment. Results: We conducted hierarchical regressions and found that social support and 2 types of hope in injured athletes predicted their rehabilitation beliefs and subjective well-being. However, only hope agency predicted their rehabilitation behavior. Also, hope and social support had an interactive effect on the prediction of subjective well-being; for participants with low hope pathways, the perception of more social support was associated with higher levels of subjective well-being, whereas social support had only a relatively low association with subjective well-being among participants with high hope pathways. Conclusions: Enhancing hope perceptions and strengthening injured athletes' social support during rehabilitation are beneficial to rehabilitation behavior and subjective well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 98
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hope, religiosity, and subjective well-being
    Nell, Werner
    Rothmann, Sebastiaan
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY IN AFRICA, 2018, 28 (04) : 253 - 260
  • [2] The role of optimism and social support on subjective well-being
    Marrero Quevedo, Rosario J.
    Carballeira Abella, Monica
    SALUD MENTAL, 2010, 33 (01) : 39 - 46
  • [3] Are there heterogeneous impacts of social support on subjective well-being?
    Hu, Qingqing
    Wang, Xiaobing
    Xu, Mark
    NATIONAL ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2021, 3 (04): : 360 - 376
  • [4] The effect of perceived social support on subjective well-being
    Gulacti, Fikret
    INNOVATION AND CREATIVITY IN EDUCATION, 2010, 2 (02): : 3844 - 3849
  • [5] Exploring the relationship between social support, resilience, and subjective well-being in athletes of adapted sport
    Mira, Tania
    Jacinto, Miguel
    Costa, Aldo M.
    Monteiro, Diogo
    Diz, Susana
    Matos, Rui
    Antunes, Raul
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [6] Chinese athletes in ethnic minorities: Social support, ethnic identity, pride, and subjective well-being
    Cui, Hao
    Peng, Zhiqiang
    Cui, Jianing
    Wang, Huilin
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2024, 52 (05):
  • [7] Social network, social support, social strain and subjective well-being
    Lettner, K
    Baumann, U
    Solva, M
    Reisenzein, E
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 31 (3-4) : 5797 - 5797
  • [8] Facebook friends, subjective well-being, social support, and personality
    Lonnqvist, Jan-Erik
    Deters, Fenne grosse
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 55 : 113 - 120
  • [9] SOCIAL SUPPORT AND SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING AMONG VIETNAMESE REFUGEES
    TRAN, TV
    WRIGHT, R
    SOCIAL SERVICE REVIEW, 1986, 60 (03) : 449 - 459
  • [10] Social Support as a Resource for Ensuring the Subjective Well-being of Students
    Veselova, Elena K.
    Korjova, Elena Yu
    Rudykhina, Olga, V
    Anisimova, Tatyana, V
    SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2021, 12 (01) : 44 - 58